Want FREE Templates on Strategy & Transformation? Download our FREE compilation of 50+ slides. This is an exclusive promotion being run on LinkedIn.







Flevy Management Insights Q&A
How can the BCG Growth-Share Matrix be adapted for service-oriented businesses where traditional product lines do not apply?


This article provides a detailed response to: How can the BCG Growth-Share Matrix be adapted for service-oriented businesses where traditional product lines do not apply? For a comprehensive understanding of BCG Growth-Share Matrix, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to BCG Growth-Share Matrix best practice resources.

TLDR Adapting the BCG Growth-Share Matrix for service-oriented businesses involves redefining market growth and share, focusing on service differentiation, and leveraging client satisfaction metrics for Strategic Planning and portfolio optimization.

Reading time: 4 minutes


The BCG Growth-Share Matrix, developed by the Boston Consulting Group, is a strategic planning tool that organizations use to evaluate the performance of their product portfolio. It categorizes business units or products into four quadrants—Stars, Cash Cows, Question Marks, and Dogs—based on their market growth rate and market share. While traditionally applied to product-centric businesses, adapting this framework for service-oriented organizations involves rethinking the definitions of 'market growth rate' and 'market share' in the context of services and considering the unique characteristics of service delivery.

Adapting Market Growth Rate and Market Share for Services

In service-oriented organizations, traditional metrics such as unit sales or production volumes are less relevant. Instead, market growth rate can be assessed through the expansion of service demand within the target market. For instance, consulting firms like McKinsey and Accenture measure market growth by analyzing trends in client demand for specific advisory services, such as Digital Transformation or Risk Management. Market share, on the other hand, can be evaluated based on the organization's share of client accounts or contracts relative to competitors, or through revenue generated from service offerings.

Service differentiation also plays a crucial role in adapting the BCG matrix for services. Unlike products, services are intangible and often customized, making the service experience and outcomes critical components of market share analysis. Organizations can segment their services not just by market, but also by the value delivered to clients, thereby identifying which services are truly unique (Stars) and which are more commoditized (Cash Cows or Dogs).

Moreover, the adoption of customer satisfaction and loyalty metrics, such as Net Promoter Score (NPS), can provide additional insights into the service's market position. High NPS scores in a rapidly growing market segment could indicate a Star service, whereas high scores in a mature market could point to a Cash Cow.

Learn more about Digital Transformation Risk Management Customer Satisfaction BCG Matrix Net Promoter Score

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Strategic Planning for Service Portfolios

Once services are categorized into the BCG matrix, organizations can develop targeted strategies for each quadrant. For Stars, the focus should be on investment and growth—expanding the service offering, increasing market penetration, or enhancing service delivery to capitalize on high demand. Real-world examples include digital marketing agencies that invest in cutting-edge analytics tools and platforms to deliver more personalized and effective campaigns.

For Cash Cows, the strategy revolves around efficiency and maximizing profit margins. This could involve automating service processes, optimizing resource allocation, or cross-selling services to existing clients. A notable example is the move by major accounting firms towards automated compliance services, leveraging technology to deliver these essential services more efficiently while focusing human expertise on higher-value advisory roles.

Question Marks require careful analysis to determine whether they represent viable growth opportunities or if resources would be better allocated elsewhere. Strategic options might include targeted investments to increase market share, repositioning the service, or even divesting. In the consulting industry, firms often reassess their portfolio of advisory services, investing in emerging areas like sustainability consulting while scaling back in areas where they cannot achieve a leading market position.

Implementing the Adapted BCG Matrix

Implementing the adapted BCG Growth-Share Matrix in a service-oriented organization requires a deep understanding of the service market dynamics and the factors driving client satisfaction and loyalty. It also necessitates a robust internal reporting system that can track service performance beyond just financial metrics, incorporating client feedback, market trends, and competitive analysis.

Change Management is critical when shifting strategic focus based on the BCG matrix analysis. Organizations must ensure that their teams are aligned with the new strategic priorities, from reallocating resources and adjusting service delivery models to adopting new technologies or methodologies. For instance, moving resources from a Dog service to a Star service may involve retraining staff, changing marketing strategies, or even altering the organizational structure.

Finally, ongoing review and adaptation of the matrix are essential. The service industry is characterized by rapid changes in client needs and competitive landscapes. Regularly revisiting the BCG matrix allows organizations to stay ahead of these changes, adjusting their service portfolio and strategies to maintain alignment with market opportunities. For example, management consulting firms frequently review their service offerings and market positioning to ensure they are addressing the most current and pressing issues faced by their clients.

Adapting the BCG Growth-Share Matrix for service-oriented organizations involves redefining market growth and share in the context of services, focusing on service differentiation, and incorporating metrics that reflect client satisfaction and loyalty. Strategic planning based on this adapted framework enables organizations to make informed decisions about where to invest, where to divest, and how to optimize their service portfolio for sustainable growth and profitability. Implementing these strategies effectively requires a combination of market insight, internal alignment, and flexibility to adapt to changing market conditions, ensuring that the organization remains competitive and responsive to client needs.

Learn more about Strategic Planning Competitive Analysis BCG Growth-Share Matrix Organizational Structure Growth-Share Matrix Competitive Landscape

Best Practices in BCG Growth-Share Matrix

Here are best practices relevant to BCG Growth-Share Matrix from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our BCG Growth-Share Matrix materials here.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Explore all of our best practices in: BCG Growth-Share Matrix

BCG Growth-Share Matrix Case Studies

For a practical understanding of BCG Growth-Share Matrix, take a look at these case studies.

E-commerce Portfolio Rationalization for Online Retailer

Scenario: The organization in question operates within the e-commerce sector, managing a diverse portfolio of products across multiple categories.

Read Full Case Study

BCG Matrix Analysis for Semiconductor Firm

Scenario: A semiconductor company operating globally is facing challenges in allocating resources efficiently across its diverse product portfolio.

Read Full Case Study

Strategic Portfolio Analysis for Retail Chain in Competitive Sector

Scenario: The organization is a retail chain operating in a highly competitive consumer market, with a diverse portfolio of products ranging from high-turnover items to niche, specialty goods.

Read Full Case Study

BCG Growth-Share Matrix Analysis for a High-Tech Corporation

Scenario: A multinational technology firm is facing challenges interpreting its BCG Growth-Share Matrix.

Read Full Case Study

Luxury Brand Portfolio Optimization in the High-End Fashion Sector

Scenario: A luxury fashion house is grappling with portfolio optimization amidst shifting consumer trends and market volatility.

Read Full Case Study

BCG Matrix Evaluation for Agritech Firm in Competitive Landscape

Scenario: An Agritech firm operating within a highly competitive sector is seeking to evaluate its product portfolio to better allocate resources and drive focused growth.

Read Full Case Study

Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies

Related Questions

Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.

Can the Boston Matrix be effectively applied in non-profit organizations, and if so, how?
The Boston Matrix can be adapted for non-profit organizations to evaluate programs based on potential impact and effectiveness, aiding in Strategic Planning, Resource Allocation, and Impact Maximization. [Read full explanation]
How can the Boston Matrix be adapted for service-oriented businesses where traditional product lifecycle metrics may not apply?
Adapting the Boston Matrix for service-oriented businesses involves redefining axes to "market potential" and "competitive advantage," and incorporating additional dimensions like Customer Satisfaction, Service Innovation, and Operational Excellence to assess future potential and strategic alignment for sustainable growth. [Read full explanation]
What impact do sustainability and environmental considerations have on the strategic positioning of business units in the BCG Matrix?
Sustainability reshapes BCG Matrix strategic positioning, enhancing Cash Cows' efficiency, driving Stars' growth, and offering differentiation or divestment for Question Marks and Dogs. [Read full explanation]
What role does customer feedback play in determining the placement of products or services in the BCG Matrix?
Customer feedback is essential in the BCG Matrix for categorizing products as Stars, Question Marks, Cash Cows, or Dogs, guiding Strategic Planning, resource allocation, and maintaining market competitiveness. [Read full explanation]
How can the BCG Growth-Share Matrix be used to evaluate and prioritize investments in emerging technologies?
The BCG Growth-Share Matrix is a Strategic Planning tool that helps companies prioritize investments in emerging technologies by classifying them into Stars, Question Marks, Cash Cows, and Dogs based on market growth and share. [Read full explanation]
What role does customer feedback play in the positioning of products within the Boston Matrix?
Customer feedback is crucial in the Boston Matrix for Strategic Planning, guiding product development, and marketing strategies to position products as Stars, Cash Cows, or transition Question Marks to Stars, and deciding the fate of Dogs. [Read full explanation]

Source: Executive Q&A: BCG Growth-Share Matrix Questions, Flevy Management Insights, 2024


Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials



Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.