This framework is developed by a team of former McKinsey and Big 4 consultants. The presentation follows the headline-body-bumper slide format used by global consulting firms.
This product (BCBS 239 - Risk Data Aggregation) is a 27-slide PPT PowerPoint presentation slide deck (PPT), which you can download immediately upon purchase.
It is a known fact that majority of the banks need to further develop their Risk Data Aggregation and Risk Reporting (RDARR) capabilities. The recent global economic crisis exposed many banks deficiency to efficiently and effectively report the events to the senior management.
BCBS 239 is the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's standard number 239, which is aimed at improving the RDARR capabilities of Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs), and establish compliance requirements for various risk types. BCBS 239 focuses on enhancing the banks' Risk Data Aggregation and Risk Reporting (RDARR) skills.
BCBS 239 regulation is presented in the form of 8 key principles that the banks need to comply with:
1. Data Architecture and IT Infrastructure
2. Accuracy and Integrity
3. Completeness
4. Timeliness
5. Accurate Reporting
6. Comprehensiveness
7. Reporting Frequency
8. Reports Dissemination
This presentation also discusses BCBS 239 implementation challenges and approach.
The slide deck also includes some slide templates for you to use in your own business presentations.
This PPT delves into the critical challenges banks face in implementing BCBS 239. Key obstacles include lack of infrastructure and data, increased reporting demands, and compliance measurement. The presentation outlines a multi-staged approach for developing metrics to comply with BCBS 239, emphasizing the need for ongoing improvement processes and strategic considerations.
The slide deck also provides detailed templates for BCBS 239 implementation and principles, covering data architecture, accuracy, completeness, and timeliness. These templates are designed to help financial institutions streamline their risk data aggregation and reporting processes, ensuring they meet regulatory requirements and enhance decision-making capabilities.
This PPT slide presents the BCBS 239 Principles, which are essential guidelines that banks must adhere to for effective risk data management. It outlines eight key principles that focus on various aspects of data handling and reporting.
The first principle, "Data Architecture and IT Infrastructure," emphasizes the importance of a robust framework that supports data integrity and accessibility. Following this, "Accuracy and Integrity" highlights the necessity for precise data to ensure reliable decision-making. "Completeness" stresses that all relevant data must be captured to provide a full picture of risk exposure.
"Timeliness" is crucial, as it dictates that data must be available when needed, allowing for prompt responses to emerging risks. The principle of "Accurate Reporting" ensures that the information presented is not only correct, but also relevant to stakeholders. "Comprehensiveness" indicates that reports should cover all necessary dimensions of risk, leaving no gaps in understanding.
"Reporting Frequency" addresses how often data should be reported, which is vital for ongoing risk assessment. Lastly, "Reports Dissemination" deals with how information is shared within the organization, ensuring that it reaches the right people at the right time.
The overarching goal of these principles is to enable banks to make informed decisions swiftly. Adhering to these guidelines can significantly enhance a bank's risk data aggregation and reporting capabilities, ultimately leading to better risk management practices. This slide serves as a foundational overview for organizations looking to align with BCBS 239 regulations.
A multi-staged approach to implementing BCBS 239 is outlined in this slide, emphasizing the importance of aligning Risk Data Aggregation and Reporting (RDARR) requirements with business needs. The implementation process is broken down into 4 key phases: identifying key indicators, developing metrics, defining thresholds, and designing monitoring and reporting systems.
In the first phase, organizations are encouraged to identify and engage stakeholders, confirm the scope of the project, gather existing information, and conduct workshops focused on relevant indicators. This foundational step ensures that all necessary perspectives are considered, setting the stage for effective metric development.
The second phase involves compiling best practices from subject matter experts and proposing metrics tailored to specific business requirements. Reviewing these metrics with stakeholders is crucial for ensuring alignment and relevance.
Defining thresholds is the third phase, where organizations establish criteria based on industry practices, expert judgment, historical experience, and regulatory expectations. This step is vital for setting clear standards against which metrics can be evaluated.
The fourth phase focuses on designing monitoring and reporting systems. This includes defining timelines, roles, responsibilities, and creating reports that fit into the existing reporting framework. Additionally, establishing escalation channels is important for addressing issues as they arise.
An ongoing improvement process is highlighted, which involves monitoring compliance, analyzing the effectiveness of the metrics, and recalibrating indicators as necessary. This iterative approach allows organizations to adapt to changing business environments and maintain the relevance of their metrics over time. Overall, the slide presents a structured methodology for organizations to ensure compliance with BCBS 239 while aligning with their strategic objectives.
This PPT slide outlines the critical principle of completeness in risk data aggregation as defined by BCBS 239. It emphasizes the necessity for decision-makers in banking to have access to comprehensive risk data, which is essential for informed decision-making. The slide highlights 2 primary focus areas: risk data aggregation capabilities and the reporting approach to risk data aggregation.
Under risk data aggregation capabilities, key metrics are provided, such as maintaining consistent materiality levels across the organization and identifying the specific methods used to aggregate risk exposures. These metrics are crucial for ensuring that the bank can effectively manage risks, particularly when data is incomplete.
The reporting approach is also detailed, with completeness thresholds for critical data elements (CDEs) and non-CDEs related to credit risk. Examples include the total number of records, the percentage of outstanding loan balances, and the percentage of authorized balances. These metrics serve to assess the effectiveness of controls at key data transfer points, the frequency of completeness tests, and the timelines for addressing issues and exceptions.
The slide concludes with a reminder of the importance of having access to data that supports the identification and reporting of exposure and emerging risks. This access is vital for making informed decisions, underscoring the interconnectedness of data completeness and effective risk management. Overall, the content serves as a guide for banks to evaluate their data aggregation practices and ensure they meet the standards set forth by BCBS 239.
This PPT slide focuses on the critical principle of accuracy and integrity in risk data management, as outlined by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) in Regulation 239. It emphasizes the necessity for banks to produce reliable risk data, which is essential for effective risk management and informed decision-making.
The content is structured around several key focus areas, beginning with "Risk data accuracy." This section explores the definitions of what constitutes "accurate" and "reliable" data, highlighting the importance of differentiating between normal and crisis situations, as well as critical versus non-critical data elements. This distinction is vital for understanding the varying levels of data reliability required in different contexts.
Next, the slide addresses "Reconciliation," which includes considerations such as the frequency of reconciliations, acceptable thresholds, and timelines for handling issues. It also discusses the degree of automation in reconciliation processes and the reliability of data sources.
The "Access to risk data" segment outlines how user access should be structured based on hierarchy and compliance processes, emphasizing the need for a clear review hierarchy and the frequency of access reviews.
The concept of a "Single authoritative source of data" is presented as a target state architecture that aims to ensure a single, trusted version of the truth. This is crucial for maintaining data integrity.
Finally, the "Maintenance" section underscores the importance of controlling reconciliation effectiveness and ongoing assessments of review processes. It stresses the need for consistent policies and procedures to mitigate risks associated with manual processes.
Overall, this slide serves as a foundational overview for organizations aiming to enhance their risk data aggregation and reporting capabilities, ensuring compliance with regulatory standards.
This PPT slide outlines 3 primary challenges banks face when implementing BCBS 239, a set of guidelines aimed at enhancing risk data aggregation and reporting capabilities.
The first challenge highlighted is the "Lack of Infrastructure and Data." Banks often struggle to create comprehensive risk data across various types during crises due to inadequate infrastructure and poor data quality. The need for a balance between automation—aimed at improving accuracy and agility—and flexibility in manual processes is emphasized. Without addressing these infrastructure issues, banks risk failing to meet the necessary requirements for Risk Data Aggregation and Reporting (RDARR), which are critical for informed decision-making.
The second challenge is the "Increasing Demand Created by New Reporting Requirements." The slide notes that banks are facing heightened reporting demands, yet many are still reliant on manual data aggregation processes. Individual business lines often submit risk reports in inconsistent formats, leading to duplicated data and overwhelmed departments. This inefficiency hampers the ability to effectively aggregate risk data, which is essential for sound decision-making and risk management.
Lastly, the slide discusses "Measuring Compliance Against the Regulations." The principle-based nature of BCBS 239 complicates compliance efforts, as banks must demonstrate adherence without clear metrics. Different interpretations of quality can arise, depending on the risk type being assessed, such as credit, market, or liquidity. This ambiguity can create challenges in establishing a consistent approach to compliance measurement.
Overall, the slide succinctly captures the complexities banks encounter in aligning with BCBS 239 and underscores the importance of addressing these challenges to enhance risk management capabilities.
This PPT slide outlines the principle of timeliness in risk data aggregation for banks, emphasizing the necessity of having relevant data readily available at any given moment. It begins with a clear assertion that timeliness is not a fixed concept, yet it is crucial for banks to ensure they possess the required data. The content is structured into 2 main sections: examples of critical risks and the measures to define and identify these risks.
Under the examples of critical risks, several categories are listed, including aggregated credit exposure to large corporate borrowers, counterparty credit risk exposures, trading exposures, liquidity risk indicators, and operational risk indicators. Each category highlights the importance of understanding the nature of these risks and their potential impact on the bank's operations.
The second section details specific measures that can be employed to define and identify these critical risks. For instance, it suggests establishing thresholds for credit exposure to large clients, assessing counterparty exposure and ratings, and evaluating position and portfolio exposures. It also emphasizes the importance of liquidity ratios, such as the liquidity coverage ratio and net cumulative cash flow, as well as operational risk self-assessment results.
The concluding statement reinforces the need for banks to have robust risk systems capable of swiftly generating aggregated risk data, particularly during critical periods. This highlights the urgency and importance of timely data in effective risk management. Overall, the slide serves as a guide for banks to enhance their risk data aggregation capabilities, ensuring they can respond promptly to potential threats.
This framework is developed by a team of former McKinsey and Big 4 consultants. The presentation follows the headline-body-bumper slide format used by global consulting firms.
For $10.00 more, you can download this document plus 2 more FlevyPro documents. That's just $13 each.
ABOUT FLEVYPRO
This document is part of the FlevyPro Library, a curated knowledge base of documents for our FlevyPro subscribers.
FlevyPro is a subscription service for on-demand business frameworks and analysis tools. FlevyPro subscribers receive access to an exclusive library of curated business documents—business framework primers, presentation templates, Lean Six Sigma tools, and more—among other exclusive benefits.
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.
Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
Read Customer Testimonials
"My FlevyPro subscription provides me with the most popular frameworks and decks in demand in today’s market. They not only augment my existing consulting and coaching offerings and delivery, but also keep me abreast of the latest trends, inspire new products and service offerings for my practice, and educate me
in a fraction of the time and money of other solutions. I strongly recommend FlevyPro to any consultant serious about success.
"
– Bill Branson, Founder at Strategic Business Architects
"Flevy is now a part of my business routine. I visit Flevy at least 3 times each month.
Flevy has become my preferred learning source, because what it provides is practical, current, and useful in this era where the business world is being rewritten.
many challenges and there is the need to make the right decisions in a short time, with so much scattered information, we are fortunate to have Flevy. Flevy investigates, selects, and puts at our disposal the best of the best to help us be successful in our work.
"
– Omar Hernán Montes Parra, CEO at Quantum SFE
"I have used Flevy services for a number of years and have never, ever been disappointed. As a matter of fact, David and his team continue, time after time, to impress me with their willingness to assist and in the real sense of the word. I have concluded in fact
that it is not at all just a repository of documents/resources but, in the way that David and his team manage the firm, it is like dealing with consultants always ready to assist, advise and direct you to what you really need, and they always get it right.
I am an international hospitality accomplished senior executive who has worked and lived during the past 35 years in 23 countries in 5 continents and I can humbly say that I know what customer service is, trust me.
Aside from the great and professional service that Flevy's team provide, their wide variety of material is of utmost great quality, professionally put together and most current.
Well done Flevy, keep up the great work and I look forward to continue working with you in the future and to recommend you to a variety of colleagues around the world.
"
– Roberto Pelliccia, Senior Executive in International Hospitality
"As a young consulting firm, requests for input from clients vary and it's sometimes impossible to provide expert solutions across a broad spectrum of requirements. That was before I discovered Flevy.com.
Through subscription to this invaluable site of a plethora of topics that are key and crucial to consulting, I
have been able to exceed expectations and deliver quality advice and solutions to my clients. The quality and expertise of the authors are exemplary and gives me great confidence to use as part of my service offerings.
I highly recommend this company for any consultant wanting to apply international best practice standards in their service offerings.
"
– Nishi Singh, Strategist and MD at NSP Consultants
"I like your product. I'm frequently designing PowerPoint presentations for my company and your product has given me so many great ideas on the use of charts, layouts, tools, and frameworks. I really think the templates are a valuable asset to the job."
– Roberto Fuentes Martinez, Senior Executive Director at Technology Transformation Advisory
"As a consultant requiring up to date and professional material that will be of value and use to my clients, I find Flevy a very reliable resource.
The variety and quality of material available through Flevy offers a very useful and commanding source for information. Using Flevy saves me time, enhances my expertise and ends up being a good decision."
– Dennis Gershowitz, Principal at DG Associates
"FlevyPro provides business frameworks from many of the global giants in management consulting that allow you to provide best in class solutions for your clients."
– David Harris, Managing Director at Futures Strategy
"As a consulting firm, we had been creating subject matter training materials for our people and found the excellent materials on Flevy, which saved us 100's of hours of re-creating what already exists on the Flevy materials we purchased."
Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Curve, and many more.
Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Curve, and many more.
Click main image to view in full screen.
