Check out our FREE Resources page – Download complimentary business frameworks, PowerPoint templates, whitepapers, and more.







Flevy Management Insights Q&A
What are the implications of using the Growth-Share Matrix in highly volatile markets, such as technology or cryptocurrencies?


This article provides a detailed response to: What are the implications of using the Growth-Share Matrix in highly volatile markets, such as technology or cryptocurrencies? For a comprehensive understanding of Growth-Share Matrix, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Growth-Share Matrix best practice resources.

TLDR Applying the Growth-Share Matrix in volatile markets like technology and cryptocurrencies demands significant adaptation, including broader assessment criteria, dynamic Strategic Planning, and a focus on Risk Management and Strategic Flexibility to navigate rapid market changes effectively.

Reading time: 4 minutes


The Growth-Share Matrix, a strategic tool introduced by the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) in the 1970s, has been widely used by organizations to prioritize their investments across different business units based on market growth rate and market share. However, its application in highly volatile markets, such as technology or cryptocurrencies, requires a nuanced understanding and adaptation to remain effective. In these sectors, rapid changes in market dynamics, technology innovation, and consumer behavior can quickly alter the landscape, impacting the strategic decision-making process.

Adaptation to Market Volatility

In highly volatile markets, the traditional metrics of market growth and share used in the Growth-Share Matrix may not fully capture the strategic value or potential of a business unit. For instance, in the technology sector, a product could be in a high-growth phase but face imminent obsolescence due to breakthrough innovations. Similarly, in the cryptocurrency market, the value and adoption of a digital asset can fluctuate wildly based on regulatory news, technological advancements, or shifts in investor sentiment. Organizations must therefore adapt the matrix criteria to include factors such as technological innovation, regulatory landscape, and market sentiment. This adaptation can help in better assessing the strategic position and potential of different units or investments in these fast-paced environments.

Moreover, the speed of change in these markets necessitates a more dynamic approach to strategic planning. Organizations should consider shorter strategic review cycles to reassess their portfolios regularly. This agility allows them to pivot or reallocate resources quickly in response to emerging opportunities or threats. For example, a tech company might shift investments from a mature product (a "Cash Cow" in the matrix terminology) to an innovative venture with high growth potential but uncertain market share, reflecting a strategic bet on future trends.

Real-world examples of successful adaptation include companies like Apple and Tesla, which continuously evaluate and adjust their product portfolios in response to technological advancements and market shifts. Apple's strategic focus on the high-growth potential of wearable technology with the Apple Watch and its investment in services are indicative of its ability to navigate and capitalize on market dynamics. Tesla's aggressive investment in electric vehicles and renewable energy solutions, even when market share was uncertain, showcases a strategic vision aligned with future growth areas, rather than current market share dominance.

Learn more about Strategic Planning Growth-Share Matrix

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Strategic Flexibility and Risk Management

Using the Growth-Share Matrix in volatile markets also emphasizes the importance of strategic flexibility and risk management. Organizations must be prepared to experiment and tolerate higher levels of risk, especially in sectors like technology and cryptocurrencies, where the potential rewards can be substantial. This might involve investing in "Question Marks" with the understanding that not all will succeed but recognizing the value of those that do in driving future growth. Strategic flexibility, in this context, means the ability to quickly scale up successful ventures and equally quickly divest or shut down those that do not meet expectations.

Risk management strategies become crucial to navigate the uncertainties of volatile markets. This includes diversifying investments across different technologies or cryptocurrencies, hedging against market volatility, and maintaining a robust financial reserve to support strategic shifts. For instance, Google's parent company, Alphabet, invests in a wide range of emerging technologies through its venture arms, Google Ventures and CapitalG, spreading its bets across sectors like artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and health technology.

Effective risk management also involves continuous market monitoring and scenario planning. Organizations must stay abreast of market trends, regulatory changes, and technological advancements, using these insights to update their strategic plans and investment priorities. This proactive approach can help organizations navigate the complexities of volatile markets, making informed decisions that balance growth potential with risk exposure.

Learn more about Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Scenario Planning

Conclusion

In conclusion, while the Growth-Share Matrix remains a valuable tool for strategic planning, its application in highly volatile markets requires significant adaptation and flexibility. Organizations must broaden the criteria used to assess business units, incorporate a more dynamic and agile approach to strategic planning, and emphasize risk management and strategic flexibility. By doing so, they can better navigate the uncertainties of these markets, making informed decisions that drive growth and innovation. The experiences of companies like Apple, Tesla, and Alphabet highlight the importance of adaptability and strategic vision in leveraging the opportunities presented by rapidly changing market landscapes.

Learn more about Agile

Best Practices in Growth-Share Matrix

Here are best practices relevant to Growth-Share Matrix from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Growth-Share Matrix materials here.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Explore all of our best practices in: Growth-Share Matrix

Growth-Share Matrix Case Studies

For a practical understanding of Growth-Share Matrix, take a look at these case studies.

E-commerce Portfolio Rationalization for Online Retailer

Scenario: The organization in question operates within the e-commerce sector, managing a diverse portfolio of products across multiple categories.

Read Full Case Study

BCG Matrix Analysis for Semiconductor Firm

Scenario: A semiconductor company operating globally is facing challenges in allocating resources efficiently across its diverse product portfolio.

Read Full Case Study

Strategic Portfolio Analysis for Retail Chain in Competitive Sector

Scenario: The organization is a retail chain operating in a highly competitive consumer market, with a diverse portfolio of products ranging from high-turnover items to niche, specialty goods.

Read Full Case Study

Luxury Brand Portfolio Optimization in the High-End Fashion Sector

Scenario: A luxury fashion house is grappling with portfolio optimization amidst shifting consumer trends and market volatility.

Read Full Case Study

BCG Growth-Share Matrix Analysis for a High-Tech Corporation

Scenario: A multinational technology firm is facing challenges interpreting its BCG Growth-Share Matrix.

Read Full Case Study

BCG Matrix Evaluation for Agritech Firm in Competitive Landscape

Scenario: An Agritech firm operating within a highly competitive sector is seeking to evaluate its product portfolio to better allocate resources and drive focused growth.

Read Full Case Study

Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies

Related Questions

Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.

Can the Boston Matrix be effectively applied in non-profit organizations, and if so, how?
The Boston Matrix can be adapted for non-profit organizations to evaluate programs based on potential impact and effectiveness, aiding in Strategic Planning, Resource Allocation, and Impact Maximization. [Read full explanation]
How can the Boston Matrix be adapted for service-oriented businesses where traditional product lifecycle metrics may not apply?
Adapting the Boston Matrix for service-oriented businesses involves redefining axes to "market potential" and "competitive advantage," and incorporating additional dimensions like Customer Satisfaction, Service Innovation, and Operational Excellence to assess future potential and strategic alignment for sustainable growth. [Read full explanation]
How does the Growth-Share Matrix align with agile methodologies in product development and management?
The Growth-Share Matrix and Agile methodologies complement each other in Strategic Planning, Resource Allocation, Market Responsiveness, Innovation, Performance Management, and Operational Excellence, enhancing decision-making in product development and management. [Read full explanation]
What role does customer feedback play in determining the placement of products or services in the BCG Matrix?
Customer feedback is essential in the BCG Matrix for categorizing products as Stars, Question Marks, Cash Cows, or Dogs, guiding Strategic Planning, resource allocation, and maintaining market competitiveness. [Read full explanation]
What impact do sustainability and environmental considerations have on the strategic positioning of business units in the BCG Matrix?
Sustainability reshapes BCG Matrix strategic positioning, enhancing Cash Cows' efficiency, driving Stars' growth, and offering differentiation or divestment for Question Marks and Dogs. [Read full explanation]
How can the BCG Growth-Share Matrix be used to evaluate and prioritize investments in emerging technologies?
The BCG Growth-Share Matrix is a Strategic Planning tool that helps companies prioritize investments in emerging technologies by classifying them into Stars, Question Marks, Cash Cows, and Dogs based on market growth and share. [Read full explanation]

Source: Executive Q&A: Growth-Share Matrix Questions, Flevy Management Insights, 2024


Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials



Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.