Check out our FREE Resources page – Download complimentary business frameworks, PowerPoint templates, whitepapers, and more.

Flevy Management Insights Q&A
What strategies can organizations use to balance their portfolio according to the Boston Matrix during economic downturns?

This article provides a detailed response to: What strategies can organizations use to balance their portfolio according to the Boston Matrix during economic downturns? For a comprehensive understanding of Boston Matrix, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Boston Matrix best practice resources.

TLDR Organizations can navigate economic downturns by strategically managing their portfolio with the Boston Matrix, focusing on investing in Stars and Cash Cows, divesting Dogs, prioritizing innovation, and adapting to market changes for long-term sustainability.

Reading time: 4 minutes

In navigating economic downturns, organizations must adopt strategic approaches to balance their portfolios effectively. The Boston Matrix, also known as the Growth-Share Matrix, provides a framework for categorizing a company's business units or products into four quadrants—Stars, Cash Cows, Question Marks, and Dogs—based on market growth and market share. This model aids in decision-making about where to invest, develop, or divest. During economic downturns, the strategic management of these categories becomes even more critical as organizations strive to allocate resources efficiently and ensure sustainability.

Investing in Stars and Cash Cows

During economic downturns, organizations should focus on investing in "Stars" and "Cash Cows." Stars, with their high growth and market share, require significant investment to maintain their position and capitalize on growth opportunities. Cash Cows, with their high market share in low-growth industries, generate steady cash flow. Organizations can leverage this cash flow to support other business units or invest in innovation and digital transformation initiatives that can provide a competitive edge. For example, a McKinsey report highlights the importance of reallocating resources swiftly to areas with the highest strategic value, suggesting that dynamic resource reallocation can lead to a 30-60% higher total return to shareholders.

Investing in digital transformation can enhance operational excellence and customer experience, driving growth even in challenging economic conditions. A real-world example is how Microsoft focused on its "Star" cloud services and "Cash Cow" software products during economic downturns, investing in cloud infrastructure and innovation. This strategy allowed Microsoft to emerge stronger, with increased market share and profitability.

Furthermore, organizations should not overlook the potential of their Cash Cows for innovation. While these units may operate in mature markets, investing in process improvements, cost reduction initiatives, and exploring new market segments can revitalize their growth potential and support the overall portfolio.

Learn more about Digital Transformation Operational Excellence Customer Experience Process Improvement Cost Reduction

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Managing Question Marks and Divesting Dogs

Question Marks, characterized by low market share in high-growth markets, represent potential future stars but require careful evaluation. Organizations should analyze these business units to determine if they can become Stars or if they should be divested. Strategic planning and performance management are crucial in this phase, as resources should be allocated to Question Marks only if they have a clear path to gaining market share and becoming Stars. Otherwise, divesting or shutting down these units may be the best course of action to preserve capital and focus on more promising areas.

Dogs, with their low growth and market share, typically do not generate significant cash flow and may even drain resources. During economic downturns, it's advisable to divest these business units to free up resources and reduce operational costs. For instance, Procter & Gamble's decision to divest up to 100 brands in 2014 to focus on its top-performing brands is a testament to the effectiveness of this strategy. By concentrating on their Stars and Cash Cows, P&G aimed to streamline operations and improve profitability.

It is essential for organizations to conduct a thorough risk management and market analysis before making divestment decisions. This ensures that divestments align with the overall Strategy Development and do not inadvertently weaken the organization's competitive position or future growth potential.

Learn more about Strategic Planning Performance Management Strategy Development Risk Management Market Analysis

Emphasizing Innovation and Market Adaptation

Innovation plays a pivotal role in maintaining and improving the positions of Stars and transforming Question Marks into future Stars. During economic downturns, consumer behaviors and market dynamics can shift rapidly. Organizations need to stay agile, leveraging insights from data analytics and market research to adapt their offerings and operations to meet changing customer needs. For example, Accenture's research emphasizes the significance of continuous innovation and adaptability for sustaining growth and building resilience against economic fluctuations.

Organizations should foster a culture of innovation, encouraging experimentation and the development of new business models. This could involve exploring new digital platforms, adopting emerging technologies, or entering new market segments. Innovation not only supports growth but also enhances operational efficiency, which is crucial for navigating economic downturns.

Finally, strategic partnerships can provide additional resources and capabilities, enabling organizations to access new markets and technologies more rapidly. Collaborating with startups, technology providers, or even competitors can lead to synergies that enhance the organization's ability to innovate and adapt. These partnerships can be particularly valuable for transforming Question Marks into Stars by leveraging external expertise and innovation.

By strategically managing their portfolio according to the Boston Matrix and focusing on investment, divestment, innovation, and market adaptation, organizations can navigate economic downturns more effectively. This approach enables them to allocate resources efficiently, capitalize on growth opportunities, and ensure long-term sustainability.

Learn more about Agile Market Research Consumer Behavior Boston Matrix Data Analytics

Best Practices in Boston Matrix

Here are best practices relevant to Boston Matrix from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Boston Matrix materials here.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Explore all of our best practices in: Boston Matrix

Boston Matrix Case Studies

For a practical understanding of Boston Matrix, take a look at these case studies.

BCG Matrix Analysis for Semiconductor Firm

Scenario: A semiconductor company operating globally is facing challenges in allocating resources efficiently across its diverse product portfolio.

Read Full Case Study

E-commerce Portfolio Rationalization for Online Retailer

Scenario: The organization in question operates within the e-commerce sector, managing a diverse portfolio of products across multiple categories.

Read Full Case Study

Strategic Portfolio Analysis for Retail Chain in Competitive Sector

Scenario: The organization is a retail chain operating in a highly competitive consumer market, with a diverse portfolio of products ranging from high-turnover items to niche, specialty goods.

Read Full Case Study

BCG Matrix Evaluation for Agritech Firm in Competitive Landscape

Scenario: An Agritech firm operating within a highly competitive sector is seeking to evaluate its product portfolio to better allocate resources and drive focused growth.

Read Full Case Study

BCG Matrix Analysis for Specialty Chemicals Manufacturer

Scenario: The organization in focus operates within the specialty chemicals sector, facing a pivotal moment in its strategic planning.

Read Full Case Study

Luxury Brand Portfolio Optimization in the High-End Fashion Sector

Scenario: A luxury fashion house is grappling with portfolio optimization amidst shifting consumer trends and market volatility.

Read Full Case Study

Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies

Related Questions

Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.

Can the Boston Matrix be effectively applied in non-profit organizations, and if so, how?
The Boston Matrix can be adapted for non-profit organizations to evaluate programs based on potential impact and effectiveness, aiding in Strategic Planning, Resource Allocation, and Impact Maximization. [Read full explanation]
How does the Growth-Share Matrix align with agile methodologies in product development and management?
The Growth-Share Matrix and Agile methodologies complement each other in Strategic Planning, Resource Allocation, Market Responsiveness, Innovation, Performance Management, and Operational Excellence, enhancing decision-making in product development and management. [Read full explanation]
What role does artificial intelligence play in optimizing the Growth-Share Matrix for predictive analytics and market trend forecasting?
AI transforms the Growth-Share Matrix into a dynamic tool for Strategic Planning, enabling precise market trend forecasting and optimized decision-making for sustainable growth. [Read full explanation]
How can the Growth-Share Matrix be adapted for digital businesses, especially those operating on platform models?
Adapting the Growth-Share Matrix for digital platforms involves incorporating Network Effects, Data Monetization Potential, and Scalability, with examples like Spotify and Netflix illustrating the transition through quadrants via data utilization and customer-centric innovation. [Read full explanation]
Can the Growth-Share Matrix be integrated with customer lifetime value (CLV) models to enhance strategic decision-making?
Integrating the Growth-Share Matrix with Customer Lifetime Value models provides a comprehensive, customer-centric approach to Strategic Planning, optimizing resource allocation and long-term profitability. [Read full explanation]
How can the BCG Growth-Share Matrix be used to evaluate and prioritize investments in emerging technologies?
The BCG Growth-Share Matrix is a Strategic Planning tool that helps companies prioritize investments in emerging technologies by classifying them into Stars, Question Marks, Cash Cows, and Dogs based on market growth and share. [Read full explanation]

Source: Executive Q&A: Boston Matrix Questions, Flevy Management Insights, 2024

Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.

Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.


Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.