Check out our FREE Resources page – Download complimentary business frameworks, PowerPoint templates, whitepapers, and more.







Flevy Management Insights Q&A
What are the three major schools of business strategy?


This article provides a detailed response to: What are the three major schools of business strategy? For a comprehensive understanding of Strategy Development, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Strategy Development best practice resources.

TLDR The three major schools of business strategy are the Design School, the Planning School, and the Positioning School, each offering unique frameworks for strategy formulation and execution.

Reading time: 5 minutes

Before we begin, let's review some important management concepts, as they related to this question.

What does Strategic Management Schools mean?
What does SWOT Analysis mean?
What does Competitive Positioning mean?
What does Formal Strategic Planning mean?


Understanding the core frameworks of strategy is essential for any C-level executive aiming to steer their organization towards success. The landscape of strategic management is complex, but it can be broadly categorized into three major schools of strategy: the Design School, the Planning School, and the Positioning School. Each of these schools offers a distinct approach to strategy formulation and execution, providing a template for leaders to analyze and navigate the challenges and opportunities their organizations face.

The Design School represents the most foundational approach among the three major schools of strategy. This school emphasizes the importance of a fit between the internal capabilities of the organization and the external environment in which it operates. The core idea is that by understanding both the organization's strengths and weaknesses and the threats and opportunities present in the external environment, leaders can craft strategies that leverage their organization's unique capabilities to achieve competitive success. This approach is highly intuitive and relies on the top management's judgment to design strategies that are both ambitious and achievable. The Design School encourages a top-down approach to strategy formulation, where the leadership plays a pivotal role in defining the strategic direction of the organization.

Consulting giants like McKinsey and BCG have long championed frameworks that resonate with the Design School's principles, such as SWOT analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats), which provides a straightforward template for organizations to assess their strategic position. Real-world examples of the Design School at work include Apple's decision to enter the mobile phone market. By understanding its distinctive competencies in design and user experience, Apple was able to disrupt the mobile phone industry with the introduction of the iPhone, demonstrating how a well-crafted strategy can leverage internal strengths to capitalize on external opportunities.

The Planning School, on the other hand, takes a more formalized and process-oriented approach to strategy. This school posits that strategy can be developed through a rigorous and systematic process of formal planning. It involves detailed analyses, forecasting, and the methodical setting of objectives and tactics. The Planning School advocates for the decomposition of strategic planning into distinct steps, which can include situation analysis, formulation of strategic options, and the implementation of chosen strategies. This approach is characterized by its reliance on analytical tools and techniques to inform decision-making, and it often involves the creation of comprehensive strategic plans that guide the organization's efforts.

Organizations like Accenture and Deloitte provide consulting services that align with the Planning School, offering strategic planning frameworks that help organizations to methodically analyze their market position and identify strategic opportunities. A notable example of the Planning School in action is seen in the global expansion strategies of major retail chains. By meticulously analyzing market data, consumer trends, and logistical considerations, these organizations are able to plan their entry into new markets with precision, significantly reducing the risks associated with international expansion.

The Positioning School stands out for its emphasis on the competitive positioning of an organization within its industry. Originating from the work of Michael Porter, this school focuses on achieving competitive advantage through strategic positioning. The core premise is that by positioning the organization in a way that exploits industry forces and competitors' weaknesses, an organization can achieve superior performance. The Positioning School advocates for the analysis of industry structure, competition, and value chains as the basis for strategy formulation. It introduces concepts such as cost leadership, differentiation, and focus strategies as templates for achieving competitive positioning.

Consulting firms like Bain & Company and Roland Berger specialize in helping organizations apply the principles of the Positioning School to their strategic challenges. They utilize Porter's Five Forces framework, among others, to analyze the competitive dynamics of industries and advise on strategic positioning. Real-world applications of the Positioning School can be observed in the strategies of low-cost airlines, which have successfully positioned themselves in the aviation industry by focusing on cost leadership. This strategic positioning allows them to attract price-sensitive customers, thereby capturing market share from traditional carriers.

In conclusion, the three major schools of strategy—the Design School, the Planning School, and the Positioning School—offer distinct but complementary approaches to strategic management. By understanding the principles and frameworks associated with each school, C-level executives can equip their organizations with the strategic insight needed to navigate the complexities of the modern business environment. Whether through leveraging internal strengths, engaging in meticulous planning, or strategically positioning the organization within the industry, these schools of strategy provide a robust foundation for achieving organizational objectives and sustaining competitive success.

Best Practices in Strategy Development

Here are best practices relevant to Strategy Development from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Strategy Development materials here.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Explore all of our best practices in: Strategy Development

Strategy Development Case Studies

For a practical understanding of Strategy Development, take a look at these case studies.

Strategy Development for a Rapidly Scaling Tech Firm

Scenario: A fast-growing technology firm, experiencing a 100% increase in its customer base and revenues over the past two years, is struggling to align its strategic objectives with its rapid growth.

Read Full Case Study

Innovative Customer Engagement Strategy for Boutique Hotels

Scenario: A boutique hotel chain is facing a stagnation in revenue growth and a decline in customer loyalty, highlighting a pressing need for strategy development.

Read Full Case Study

Revenue Growth Strategy for Boutique Hospitality Firm

Scenario: The organization is a boutique hospitality provider specializing in luxury experiences, facing competitive pressures in a saturated market.

Read Full Case Study

Strategic Development Initiative for a Global Education Provider

Scenario: The organization is a global education provider grappling with digital transformation and market diversification.

Read Full Case Study

Direct-to-Consumer Strategy Blueprint for Sustainable Food Brand

Scenario: The organization in focus operates within the direct-to-consumer (D2C) niche of the food and beverage industry, specializing in sustainable and organic products.

Read Full Case Study

Automation Strategy for Mid-Size Waste Management Firm in North America

Scenario: A mid-size waste management company in North America is at a crossroads with its Strategy Development, facing the dual challenge of increasing operational costs and a fiercely competitive market.

Read Full Case Study

Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies

Related Questions

Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.

What are the key indicators that a company's sustainability efforts are effectively integrated into its corporate strategy?
Effective integration of sustainability into corporate strategy is indicated by Leadership Commitment, Strategic Alignment with core operations, and Measurable Impact with transparency, ensuring long-term business resilience and value creation. [Read full explanation]
What impact are geopolitical shifts having on global strategy development, and how can companies adapt?
Geopolitical shifts necessitate agile Strategy Development, Risk Management, and Digital Transformation, with organizations like Apple and Siemens leading by diversifying supply chains and investing in technology for resilience. [Read full explanation]
How can organizations ensure alignment between their digital transformation efforts and overarching strategic goals?
Organizations can align Digital Transformation with Strategic Goals through comprehensive Strategic Planning, Leadership, Culture, and Performance Management, ensuring technologies drive towards long-term objectives for sustainable success. [Read full explanation]
How are companies incorporating the principles of the circular economy into their strategic planning to drive sustainability and innovation?
Organizations are integrating Circular Economy principles into Strategic Planning to drive sustainability and innovation, leveraging Digital Transformation, sustainable supply chain practices, and business model innovation for environmental and economic benefits. [Read full explanation]
In the context of increasing global competition, how can companies identify and capitalize on new market opportunities during the strategy development phase?
Identifying and capitalizing on new market opportunities in the Strategy Development phase involves a strategic, data-driven approach that includes Market Analysis, Consumer Insights, Strategic Partnerships, and leveraging Digital Transformation for sustainable growth. [Read full explanation]
What role does digital transformation play in modern strategy development, and how can companies ensure they are leveraging technology effectively?
Digital Transformation is crucial in Strategy Development, driving operational, cultural, and customer engagement innovations, with successful leverage requiring strategic alignment, leadership, and continuous skill development. [Read full explanation]

Source: Executive Q&A: Strategy Development Questions, Flevy Management Insights, 2024


Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials



Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.