These metrics are essential for managing water resources, ensuring the delivery of safe water, and promoting sustainable practices. KPIs support the efficient and responsible provision of water services. They are key for organizations involved in water management to ensure the health and satisfaction of consumers and the protection of the environment.
KPI |
Definition
|
Business Insights [?]
|
Measurement Approach
|
Standard Formula
|
Asset Condition Assessment Coverage More Details |
The percentage of water utility assets that have undergone condition assessment, indicating proactive infrastructure management.
|
Enables understanding of asset health and helps prioritize maintenance and replacement, informing asset management strategies.
|
Percentage of assets assessed out of total assets; typically includes age, condition, criticality, and performance data.
|
(Total Assets Assessed / Total Asset Count) * 100
|
- An increasing asset condition assessment coverage may indicate a proactive approach to infrastructure management and maintenance.
- A decreasing coverage could signal a lack of resources or prioritization for asset assessment, leading to potential risks of infrastructure failure.
- What is the current percentage of water utility assets that have undergone condition assessment?
- Are there specific types of assets that are consistently excluded from the assessment process?
- How does the coverage compare with industry standards or best practices?
- Implement a systematic approach to prioritize and schedule asset condition assessments based on criticality and risk.
- Invest in technologies such as remote sensing or IoT devices to streamline and automate the assessment process.
- Allocate sufficient resources and budget for regular and comprehensive asset condition assessments.
Visualization Suggestions [?]
- Line charts showing the trend of asset condition assessment coverage over time.
- Pie charts to visualize the distribution of assessed and unassessed asset categories.
- Low asset condition assessment coverage may lead to unexpected failures and service disruptions, impacting customer satisfaction and regulatory compliance.
- Inadequate assessment coverage can result in inefficient resource allocation and increased long-term maintenance costs.
- Asset management software like IBM Maximo or SAP EAM for tracking and managing the condition assessment process.
- Geospatial analysis tools to visualize and prioritize assets for assessment based on location and criticality.
- Integrate asset condition assessment data with maintenance management systems to prioritize and schedule maintenance activities based on assessment results.
- Link assessment coverage with financial systems to justify budget allocation for infrastructure maintenance and replacement.
- Improving asset condition assessment coverage can lead to better resource allocation, reduced downtime, and improved overall operational efficiency.
- However, increasing coverage may require additional investment and resources, impacting short-term financial performance.
|
Asset Management Efficiency More Details |
The ratio of effective asset lifecycle management processes to total assets, indicating the utility's ability to manage and maintain its infrastructure.
|
Reveals how well the utility is managing its assets relative to their value, highlighting areas to optimize spending and improve ROI.
|
Compares the cost-effectiveness of asset management activities against the value of assets being managed; may include O&M costs and asset base value.
|
Total Cost of Asset Management / Total Value of Assets Managed
|
- Increasing asset management efficiency may indicate improved maintenance processes or better utilization of existing infrastructure.
- A decreasing efficiency ratio could signal aging infrastructure or ineffective asset management practices.
- Are there specific asset categories or locations with consistently low efficiency ratios?
- How does our asset management efficiency compare with industry benchmarks or similar utility companies?
- Implement predictive maintenance strategies to proactively address asset issues before they become critical.
- Invest in training and development for maintenance staff to ensure proper asset care and management.
- Leverage asset management software to streamline maintenance schedules and track asset performance.
Visualization Suggestions [?]
- Line charts showing the trend of asset management efficiency over time.
- Pie charts to visualize the distribution of assets by efficiency ratio categories.
- Low asset management efficiency can lead to increased downtime and operational disruptions.
- Poorly managed assets may pose safety risks and compliance issues.
- Enterprise asset management (EAM) software to centralize asset data and streamline maintenance processes.
- IoT sensors and monitoring systems to gather real-time data on asset performance and condition.
- Integrate asset management efficiency data with financial systems to understand the impact of maintenance costs on overall operations.
- Link asset management metrics with workforce management systems to optimize maintenance schedules and resource allocation.
- Improving asset management efficiency can reduce operational costs and extend the lifespan of assets.
- However, changes in maintenance practices may initially disrupt operations and require additional resources.
|
Average Response Time to Service Interruptions More Details |
The average time taken by the water utility to respond to and address interruptions in water service, showing the utility's ability to quickly restore service.
|
Indicates the utility's responsiveness and ability to quickly restore services, impacting customer satisfaction.
|
The time taken to respond to and address service disruptions, interruptions, or outages.
|
Sum of Response Times for Service Interruptions / Number of Service Interruptions
|
- An increasing average response time may indicate operational inefficiencies or resource constraints.
- A decreasing average response time can signal improved emergency response protocols or proactive maintenance efforts.
- What are the primary factors contributing to delays in responding to service interruptions?
- How does our average response time compare to industry benchmarks or regulatory standards?
- Invest in advanced monitoring and alert systems to quickly detect service interruptions.
- Implement regular training and simulations for emergency response teams to improve efficiency.
- Consider strategic placement of emergency response equipment to reduce travel time to service interruption locations.
Visualization Suggestions [?]
- Line charts showing average response time over different time periods (e.g., monthly, quarterly).
- Geospatial maps indicating response time variations across different service areas.
- Extended response times can lead to public health and safety concerns, as well as regulatory non-compliance.
- Frequent service interruptions with prolonged response times may result in customer dissatisfaction and reputational damage.
- Field service management software to optimize dispatching and routing of response teams.
- IoT devices and sensors for real-time monitoring of water infrastructure to detect potential service interruptions.
- Integrate average response time data with customer relationship management systems to track customer impact and feedback.
- Link with asset management systems to prioritize maintenance activities based on historical service interruption data.
- Reducing average response time can enhance customer satisfaction and trust, leading to increased customer retention.
- However, investing in resources to improve response time may impact operational costs and budget allocation.
|
CORE BENEFITS
- 38 KPIs under ISO 24510
- 15,468 total KPIs (and growing)
- 328 total KPI groups
- 75 industry-specific KPI groups
- 12 attributes per KPI
- Full access (no viewing limits or restrictions)
FlevyPro and Stream subscribers also receive access to the KPI Library. You can login to Flevy here.
|
IMPORTANT: 17 days left until the annual price is increased from $99 to $149.
$99/year
Benchmarking Against Peer Utilities More Details |
The utility's performance compared to similar utilities on key metrics, facilitating the identification of best practices and areas for improvement.
|
Provides a relative position within the industry, identifying areas of strength and opportunities for improvement.
|
Comparison of performance metrics such as efficiency, cost, and service levels against comparable utilities.
|
Performance Metric of Interest (Utility) / Corresponding Metric (Peer Group Average)
|
- Comparing the utility's performance against peer utilities over multiple periods to identify consistent trends.
- Looking for any significant deviations from the benchmarking data that could signal positive or negative shifts in performance.
- How do our key metrics compare to those of similar utilities?
- What specific areas of our operations can be improved based on the benchmarking results?
- Implement best practices identified from top-performing peer utilities.
- Regularly review and adjust operational processes to align with industry benchmarks.
- Invest in technology and tools that have proven to be effective for high-performing utilities.
Visualization Suggestions [?]
- Line charts showing the utility's performance trend compared to peer averages over time.
- Bar graphs comparing specific key metrics against peer utilities for easy visual comparison.
- Failure to meet industry benchmarks may result in decreased efficiency and competitiveness.
- Ignoring areas for improvement identified through benchmarking can lead to stagnation and underperformance.
- Business intelligence and analytics software to compare and analyze performance data against peer utilities.
- Collaboration platforms for sharing best practices and insights with similar utilities.
- Integrate benchmarking data with performance management systems to align operational goals with industry standards.
- Incorporate benchmarking results into strategic planning and decision-making processes.
- Improving performance based on benchmarking can lead to increased operational efficiency and cost savings.
- Failure to meet industry benchmarks may result in decreased efficiency and competitiveness.
|
Cost of Operations per Cubic Meter More Details |
The total operational cost divided by the volume of water produced or distributed, reflecting the financial efficiency of the utility's operations.
|
Helps in analyzing the efficiency of water service delivery and the potential for cost reduction.
|
Total operational costs divided by the volume of water treated or distributed.
|
Total Operational Costs / Total Volume of Water Treated or Distributed (Cubic Meters)
|
- An increasing cost of operations per cubic meter may indicate inefficiencies in production or distribution processes.
- A decreasing cost can signal improved operational effectiveness or cost-saving measures.
- Are there specific areas of operations where costs are consistently higher?
- How does our cost of operations per cubic meter compare with industry benchmarks or similar utilities?
- Implement water-saving technologies to reduce production costs.
- Regularly review and optimize operational processes to identify cost-saving opportunities.
- Invest in training and development programs to improve operational efficiency and reduce costs.
Visualization Suggestions [?]
- Line charts showing the trend of cost of operations per cubic meter over time.
- Pie charts to visualize the distribution of operational costs across different areas of production or distribution.
- High cost of operations per cubic meter can lead to financial strain and reduced profitability.
- Consistently increasing costs may indicate underlying issues in operational management that need to be addressed.
- Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems to track and analyze operational costs in real-time.
- Data analytics tools to identify cost-saving opportunities and optimize resource allocation.
- Integrate cost of operations tracking with financial management systems to align operational costs with budgeting and forecasting.
- Link with asset management systems to assess the impact of equipment and infrastructure on operational costs.
- Reducing the cost of operations per cubic meter may require initial investments in technology or process improvements.
- However, lowering operational costs can lead to improved financial performance and sustainability in the long run.
|
Customer Complaint Resolution Rate More Details |
The percentage of customer complaints that are resolved to the customer's satisfaction within a specified time frame, measuring service quality and responsiveness.
|
Measures the effectiveness of the utility's customer service and resolution processes, impacting satisfaction and trust.
|
The percentage of customer complaints resolved within a specified timeframe.
|
(Number of Customer Complaints Resolved / Total Number of Customer Complaints Received) * 100
|
- An increasing customer complaint resolution rate may indicate improved customer service processes or better communication with customers.
- A decreasing rate could signal issues with service quality, response times, or customer satisfaction.
- Are there common themes or recurring issues in customer complaints that need to be addressed?
- How does our resolution rate compare with industry benchmarks or customer expectations?
- Implement a robust customer feedback system to capture and address complaints effectively.
- Provide training to frontline staff on conflict resolution and problem-solving skills.
- Regularly review and update customer service processes to ensure timely and satisfactory complaint resolution.
Visualization Suggestions [?]
- Line charts showing the trend of resolution rates over time.
- Pareto charts to identify the most common types of complaints and their resolution status.
- A low resolution rate can lead to customer churn and negative word-of-mouth, impacting brand reputation.
- Unresolved complaints may escalate and result in legal or regulatory issues.
- Customer relationship management (CRM) software to track and manage customer complaints.
- Social listening tools to monitor online feedback and complaints.
- Integrate complaint resolution data with customer satisfaction surveys to understand the impact of resolutions on overall satisfaction.
- Link complaint resolution with employee performance evaluations to incentivize effective resolution and service delivery.
- Improving the resolution rate can enhance customer loyalty and retention, leading to long-term business growth.
- However, focusing solely on resolution rate without addressing root causes of complaints may result in temporary improvements with long-term negative impact.
|
In selecting the most appropriate ISO 24510 KPIs from our KPI Library for your organizational situation, keep in mind the following guiding principles:
It is also important to remember that the only constant is change—strategies evolve, markets experience disruptions, and organizational environments also change over time. Thus, in an ever-evolving business landscape, what was relevant yesterday may not be today, and this principle applies directly to KPIs. We should follow these guiding principles to ensure our KPIs are maintained properly:
By systematically reviewing and adjusting our ISO 24510 KPIs, we can ensure that your organization's decision-making is always supported by the most relevant and actionable data, keeping the organization agile and aligned with its evolving strategic objectives.