Want FREE Templates on Digital Transformation? Download our FREE compilation of 50+ slides. This is an exclusive promotion being run on LinkedIn.







Flevy Management Insights Q&A
How can manufacturers use Make vs. Buy decisions to better align with consumer demands for ethical and sustainable products?


This article provides a detailed response to: How can manufacturers use Make vs. Buy decisions to better align with consumer demands for ethical and sustainable products? For a comprehensive understanding of Make or Buy, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Make or Buy best practice resources.

TLDR Manufacturers can align with consumer demands for ethical and sustainable products through informed Make vs. Buy decisions, focusing on Strategic Sourcing, Supplier Partnerships, and investing in Sustainable Manufacturing Technologies.

Reading time: 5 minutes


Manufacturers today are increasingly facing the challenge of aligning their operations with the growing consumer demands for ethical and sustainable products. The Make vs. Buy decision, a fundamental aspect of Strategic Planning, plays a crucial role in this alignment. This decision-making process involves evaluating whether it is more cost-effective and strategically beneficial for an organization to produce its components in-house (Make) or to purchase them from external suppliers (Buy). In the context of sustainability and ethics, this decision has far-reaching implications for an organization's supply chain, brand reputation, and customer loyalty.

Understanding Consumer Expectations

Consumer expectations around ethical and sustainable products have shifted dramatically. A report by Accenture Strategy highlights that consumers are more likely to purchase from brands with a reputation for environmental stewardship and ethical practices. This shift is not just a passing trend but a fundamental change in consumer behavior, driven by a deeper awareness of environmental issues and social justice. Organizations must respond to this change by embedding sustainability into their core operations, starting with the Make vs. Buy decision. By choosing to Buy components from suppliers that adhere to sustainable practices, organizations can reduce their environmental footprint and align more closely with consumer values. Conversely, the Make option allows for greater control over the production process, enabling organizations to implement eco-friendly manufacturing practices directly.

Moreover, the transparency in supply chains has become a critical factor. Consumers are increasingly interested in the origin of the products they purchase, including the conditions under which they were produced. This interest extends to the entire supply chain, from raw materials to final assembly. Organizations, therefore, need to consider how their Make vs. Buy decisions affect transparency and whether their suppliers meet the ethical standards expected by their customers.

Finally, leveraging digital technologies for better supply chain visibility can help organizations make informed Make vs. Buy decisions. Tools such as blockchain for traceability or AI for predicting the environmental impact of certain materials can provide valuable insights. These technologies not only aid in making decisions that align with sustainability goals but also enhance operational efficiency and innovation.

Explore related management topics: Supply Chain Consumer Behavior

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Strategic Sourcing and Supplier Partnerships

Strategic Sourcing is a key component in aligning Make vs. Buy decisions with sustainability goals. This involves a careful evaluation of suppliers based on their environmental and social governance (ESG) practices. Organizations must develop criteria that prioritize sustainability and ethical practices in their sourcing strategies. This might include assessing the carbon footprint of the supplier's operations, their labor practices, and their commitment to reducing waste. By selecting suppliers that meet these criteria, organizations can ensure that their Buy decisions contribute positively to their sustainability objectives.

Building long-term partnerships with suppliers is also crucial. These partnerships can foster collaboration on sustainable practices and innovation. For example, an organization might work with its suppliers to develop new, less resource-intensive materials or to improve the energy efficiency of the manufacturing process. Such collaborations can lead to significant improvements in sustainability, benefiting not just the individual organization and its suppliers but the broader ecosystem as well.

Real-world examples of this approach include companies like Patagonia and IKEA, which have invested heavily in sustainable sourcing. Patagonia, for instance, has a rigorous standard for all its suppliers, focusing on environmental and social metrics, and actively promotes fair labor practices and organic materials. IKEA has committed to becoming climate positive by 2030, part of which involves working closely with its suppliers to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. These examples illustrate how strategic sourcing and supplier partnerships can be leveraged to align Make vs. Buy decisions with consumer demands for sustainability.

Explore related management topics: Strategic Sourcing

Investing in Sustainable Manufacturing Technologies

For those components or products that an organization decides to Make, investing in sustainable manufacturing technologies is essential. This includes technologies that reduce waste, improve energy efficiency, and minimize the use of harmful materials. Advanced manufacturing techniques such as additive manufacturing (3D printing) can significantly reduce material waste and energy consumption. Similarly, renewable energy sources can power manufacturing facilities, further reducing the carbon footprint.

Moreover, sustainable manufacturing also involves the adoption of circular economy principles. This means designing products for longevity, reparability, and recyclability, thereby reducing waste and resource consumption. Organizations can use their control over the manufacturing process to implement these principles directly, aligning their operations with consumer expectations for sustainable products.

An example of an organization investing in sustainable manufacturing is Tesla, Inc., which has built its brand around sustainability. Tesla's Gigafactories are designed to be powered entirely by renewable energy, showcasing how investments in sustainable manufacturing technologies can align with consumer demands for ethical and sustainable products. Additionally, Tesla's commitment to battery recycling is an example of applying circular economy principles in manufacturing.

In conclusion, manufacturers can better align with consumer demands for ethical and sustainable products by making informed Make vs. Buy decisions. Understanding consumer expectations, engaging in strategic sourcing and supplier partnerships, and investing in sustainable manufacturing technologies are all critical components of this alignment. By taking these steps, organizations can not only meet the growing demand for sustainable products but also contribute positively to the global effort to achieve environmental sustainability and social justice.

Explore related management topics: 3D Printing Circular Economy

Best Practices in Make or Buy

Here are best practices relevant to Make or Buy from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Make or Buy materials here.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Explore all of our best practices in: Make or Buy

Make or Buy Case Studies

For a practical understanding of Make or Buy, take a look at these case studies.

Build vs. Buy Decision Framework for Semiconductor Manufacturer

Scenario: A semiconductor firm in the highly competitive technology sector is grappling with the strategic decision of building in-house capabilities versus buying or licensing from external sources.

Read Full Case Study

Global Supply Chain Optimization Strategy for Industrial Metals Distributor

Scenario: An established industrial metals distributor is facing a critical "make or buy" decision to improve its global supply chain efficiency.

Read Full Case Study

Customer Loyalty Program Development in the Cosmetics Industry

Scenario: The organization is a multinational cosmetics enterprise seeking to enhance its competitive edge by establishing a customer loyalty program.

Read Full Case Study

Make or Buy Decision Analysis for Luxury Goods Manufacturer

Scenario: The organization in question is a high-end luxury goods manufacturer facing challenges in deciding whether to make components in-house or outsource to third-party vendors.

Read Full Case Study

Make or Buy Decision Analysis for Biotech Firm in Specialty Pharmaceuticals

Scenario: A biotech firm specializing in specialty pharmaceuticals faces challenges in optimizing its Make or Buy strategy.

Read Full Case Study

Agile Procurement Strategy for Healthcare Equipment Distributor

Scenario: A leading healthcare equipment distributor is at a crossroads, facing the strategic challenge of deciding on a make or buy decision for their logistics operations.

Read Full Case Study


Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies

Related Questions

Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.

How do Make vs. Buy decisions affect the innovation cycle in the manufacturing sector?
Make vs. Buy decisions in the manufacturing sector significantly impact innovation, affecting Core Competencies, speed, flexibility, and investment, with strategic management of these decisions being crucial for fostering innovation and maintaining market leadership. [Read full explanation]
How does the shift towards remote work influence Make vs. Buy decisions in technology infrastructure?
The shift towards remote work has made Make vs. Buy decisions in technology infrastructure more complex, necessitating deeper analysis of cost, scalability, security, compliance, and Strategic Planning to align with organizational goals. [Read full explanation]
What role does the increasing focus on mental health and well-being in the workplace play in Make vs. Buy decisions for HR technologies?
The focus on mental health in the workplace is crucial for Make vs. Buy HR technology decisions, balancing cost, customization, and scalability with impacts on culture and engagement. [Read full explanation]
What role does digital transformation play in influencing the make-or-buy decision-making process?
Digital Transformation significantly alters the make-or-buy decision-making process by adding considerations of digital capabilities, innovation potential, and market agility into Strategic Planning, Operational Excellence, and Risk Management. [Read full explanation]
How does the Build vs. Buy decision impact supply chain resilience in the manufacturing sector?
The Build vs. Buy decision significantly influences supply chain resilience in manufacturing, balancing in-house capability development with outsourcing to optimize control, flexibility, and response to disruptions. [Read full explanation]
How are companies leveraging the Internet of Things (IoT) in their Build vs. Buy decisions to improve operational efficiency?
Organizations are leveraging IoT in Build vs. Buy decisions by aligning these choices with Strategic Planning, assessing internal capabilities and Risk Management, to significantly improve Operational Efficiency and customer satisfaction. [Read full explanation]
What impact does the increasing importance of data privacy regulations have on the Build vs. Buy debate?
The increasing importance of data privacy regulations significantly influences the Build vs. Buy debate, necessitating careful consideration of Strategic Planning, Risk Management, Operational Excellence, and Innovation to ensure compliance and maintain Competitive Advantage. [Read full explanation]
What role does the concept of the circular economy play in shaping Make vs. Buy decisions?
The circular economy is reshaping Make vs. Buy decisions by introducing sustainability, resource efficiency, and lifecycle considerations, leading to innovative business models and closer collaboration with suppliers. [Read full explanation]

Source: Executive Q&A: Make or Buy Questions, Flevy Management Insights, 2024


Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials



Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.