Flevy Management Insights Q&A

What are the strategic considerations for Make vs. Buy in light of emerging blockchain technologies?

     Joseph Robinson    |    Make or Buy


This article provides a detailed response to: What are the strategic considerations for Make vs. Buy in light of emerging blockchain technologies? For a comprehensive understanding of Make or Buy, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Make or Buy best practice resources.

TLDR The Make vs. Buy decision in blockchain technology integration requires careful evaluation of strategic objectives, internal capabilities, and alignment with overall Strategy Development, Innovation, and Digital Transformation goals.

Reading time: 5 minutes

Before we begin, let's review some important management concepts, as they related to this question.

What does Strategic Planning mean?
What does Return on Investment mean?
What does Change Management mean?
What does Vendor Management mean?


In the rapidly evolving landscape of technology, organizations are constantly faced with the decision to Make or Buy when it comes to integrating new technologies into their operations. With the rise of blockchain technology, this decision has become even more critical. Blockchain offers a transformative potential for enhancing transparency, security, and efficiency in various business processes. However, integrating blockchain into an organization's operations requires careful Strategic Planning, considering both the immediate and long-term implications.

Understanding the Strategic Implications of Blockchain

The first step in the Make vs. Buy decision process is understanding the strategic implications of blockchain technology for the organization. Blockchain can revolutionize how an organization manages data, conducts transactions, and interacts with stakeholders. For instance, in supply chain management, blockchain can provide unprecedented transparency and traceability, reducing fraud and errors. In finance, it can streamline processes and reduce costs by eliminating intermediaries. However, the adoption of blockchain technology also involves significant challenges, including technical complexity, regulatory uncertainty, and the need for a robust cybersecurity framework.

Organizations must assess their strategic objectives, market position, and competitive landscape to determine whether blockchain technology can provide a competitive advantage. This involves analyzing the potential Return on Investment (ROI) and comparing it against the costs and risks associated with developing blockchain solutions in-house (Make) versus partnering with external vendors (Buy). It's crucial to consider the organization's capacity for innovation, existing IT infrastructure, and technical expertise when making this decision.

While specific statistics from leading consulting firms on the ROI of blockchain projects are not readily available due to the nascent nature of the technology and confidentiality of business data, reports from firms like Deloitte and PwC highlight the growing interest and investment in blockchain across industries. These reports suggest that organizations are increasingly recognizing blockchain's potential to drive efficiency, transparency, and competitive advantage.

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Make: Developing In-House Blockchain Capabilities

Choosing to develop blockchain solutions in-house allows organizations to tailor the technology to their specific needs. It provides control over the development process, the flexibility to iterate, and the ability to integrate blockchain deeply into existing systems and processes. However, building in-house blockchain capabilities requires significant investment in talent acquisition, training, and research and development. Organizations must have or be willing to develop a strong foundation in blockchain technology, including understanding its limitations and regulatory implications.

The benefits of developing blockchain solutions in-house include the potential for innovation and differentiation in the market. For example, Walmart's in-house development of a blockchain system for supply chain management has set a benchmark in the retail industry for product traceability and safety. However, the challenges are non-trivial, including the need for a substantial upfront investment and the risk of technology obsolescence in a rapidly evolving field.

Organizations considering the Make option must engage in thorough Strategic Planning, assessing their internal capabilities and readiness to adopt new technologies. This includes evaluating the organization's culture, leadership commitment to innovation, and the ability to manage Change Management processes effectively. Additionally, organizations must consider the long-term implications of maintaining and upgrading blockchain solutions, as well as the potential need for partnerships to ensure interoperability and standardization.

Buy: Partnering with Blockchain Technology Providers

For many organizations, the Buy option—partnering with external blockchain technology providers—offers a way to leverage the benefits of blockchain without the complexities of developing solutions in-house. This approach allows organizations to tap into the expertise and established solutions of blockchain technology firms, reducing time to market and leveraging proven platforms. Buying also mitigates some of the risks associated with the rapid technological evolution and regulatory changes in the blockchain space.

However, when opting to Buy, organizations must conduct thorough due diligence to select the right partners. This includes evaluating the provider's technical capabilities, track record, understanding of the industry, and the alignment of their solution with the organization's strategic objectives. For example, IBM's blockchain platform has been adopted by numerous organizations across industries, offering a tested and scalable solution for various applications, from supply chain management to financial transactions.

Choosing the Buy option also requires careful consideration of vendor lock-in risks, data security, and compliance with regulatory standards. Organizations must negotiate contracts that ensure flexibility, data portability, and the ability to adapt to changing business needs and technological advancements. Effective partnership management, clear communication of requirements, and ongoing performance management are critical to the success of Buy decisions in the context of blockchain technology adoption.

In summary, the decision to Make or Buy in the context of emerging blockchain technologies involves a complex set of strategic considerations. Organizations must carefully assess their strategic objectives, internal capabilities, and the potential benefits and challenges of blockchain technology. Whether developing in-house blockchain solutions or partnering with external providers, the key to success lies in aligning the decision with the organization's overall Strategy Development, Innovation, and Digital Transformation goals.

Best Practices in Make or Buy

Here are best practices relevant to Make or Buy from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Make or Buy materials here.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Explore all of our best practices in: Make or Buy

Make or Buy Case Studies

For a practical understanding of Make or Buy, take a look at these case studies.

Defense Procurement Strategy for Aerospace Components

Scenario: The organization is a major player in the aerospace defense sector, grappling with the decision to make or buy critical components.

Read Full Case Study

Telecom Infrastructure Outsourcing Strategy

Scenario: The organization is a regional telecom operator facing increased pressure to modernize its infrastructure while managing costs.

Read Full Case Study

Build vs. Buy Decision Framework for Semiconductor Manufacturer

Scenario: A semiconductor firm in the highly competitive technology sector is grappling with the strategic decision of building in-house capabilities versus buying or licensing from external sources.

Read Full Case Study

Luxury Brand E-commerce Platform Decision

Scenario: A luxury fashion house is grappling with the decision to develop an in-house e-commerce platform or to leverage an existing third-party solution.

Read Full Case Study

Make or Buy Decision Analysis for a Global Electronics Manufacturer

Scenario: A global electronics manufacturer is grappling with escalating operational costs and supply chain complexities.

Read Full Case Study

Make or Buy Decision Analysis for Luxury Goods Manufacturer

Scenario: The organization in question is a high-end luxury goods manufacturer facing challenges in deciding whether to make components in-house or outsource to third-party vendors.

Read Full Case Study


Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies

Related Questions

Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.

How should companies approach the make-or-buy decision in highly regulated industries differently?
In highly regulated industries, companies must adopt a comprehensive approach to the make-or-buy decision, considering Regulatory Compliance, Risk Management, Strategic Alignment, and long-term implications for sustainable success. [Read full explanation]
What is a make or buy analysis?
A make or buy analysis is a strategic framework for deciding whether to produce a product in-house or purchase it from an external supplier, considering cost, quality, and risk. [Read full explanation]
What are the key indicators that suggest a company should pivot from a "Buy" to a "Build" strategy, or vice versa, in response to market changes?
Discover when to pivot from a Buy to a Build strategy (or vice versa) by evaluating Cost, Time to Market, Core Competencies, and Strategic Fit for competitive advantage. [Read full explanation]
What role does corporate social responsibility (CSR) play in the Build vs. Buy decision-making process?
Integrating Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) into Strategic Planning and Operational Excellence influences the Build vs. Buy decision, enhancing brand reputation, sustainability, and market competitiveness. [Read full explanation]
What impact do global supply chain disruptions have on the make-or-buy decision-making process?
Global supply chain disruptions significantly impact the make-or-buy decision-making process, emphasizing Risk Management, Strategic Alignment, Operational Excellence, and the need for agility, resilience, and innovation in sourcing strategies. [Read full explanation]
In what ways can the make-or-buy decision impact a company's sustainability goals and practices?
The make-or-buy decision significantly impacts an organization's sustainability by influencing environmental stewardship, social responsibility, and economic viability through direct control or supply chain influence. [Read full explanation]

 
Joseph Robinson, New York

Operational Excellence, Management Consulting

This Q&A article was reviewed by Joseph Robinson. Joseph is the VP of Strategy at Flevy with expertise in Corporate Strategy and Operational Excellence. Prior to Flevy, Joseph worked at the Boston Consulting Group. He also has an MBA from MIT Sloan.

To cite this article, please use:

Source: "What are the strategic considerations for Make vs. Buy in light of emerging blockchain technologies?," Flevy Management Insights, Joseph Robinson, 2025




Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials

 
"As a small business owner, the resource material available from FlevyPro has proven to be invaluable. The ability to search for material on demand based our project events and client requirements was great for me and proved very beneficial to my clients. Importantly, being able to easily edit and tailor "

– Michael Duff, Managing Director at Change Strategy (UK)
 
"As an Independent Management Consultant, I find Flevy to add great value as a source of best practices, templates and information on new trends. Flevy has matured and the quality and quantity of the library is excellent. Lastly the price charged is reasonable, creating a win-win value for "

– Jim Schoen, Principal at FRC Group
 
"As a niche strategic consulting firm, Flevy and FlevyPro frameworks and documents are an on-going reference to help us structure our findings and recommendations to our clients as well as improve their clarity, strength, and visual power. For us, it is an invaluable resource to increase our impact and value."

– David Coloma, Consulting Area Manager at Cynertia Consulting
 
"My FlevyPro subscription provides me with the most popular frameworks and decks in demand in today’s market. They not only augment my existing consulting and coaching offerings and delivery, but also keep me abreast of the latest trends, inspire new products and service offerings for my practice, and educate me "

– Bill Branson, Founder at Strategic Business Architects
 
"One of the great discoveries that I have made for my business is the Flevy library of training materials.

As a Lean Transformation Expert, I am always making presentations to clients on a variety of topics: Training, Transformation, Total Productive Maintenance, Culture, Coaching, Tools, Leadership Behavior, etc. Flevy "

– Ed Kemmerling, Senior Lean Transformation Expert at PMG
 
"I like your product. I'm frequently designing PowerPoint presentations for my company and your product has given me so many great ideas on the use of charts, layouts, tools, and frameworks. I really think the templates are a valuable asset to the job."

– Roberto Fuentes Martinez, Senior Executive Director at Technology Transformation Advisory
 
"As a consulting firm, we had been creating subject matter training materials for our people and found the excellent materials on Flevy, which saved us 100's of hours of re-creating what already exists on the Flevy materials we purchased."

– Michael Evans, Managing Director at Newport LLC
 
"Flevy is now a part of my business routine. I visit Flevy at least 3 times each month.

Flevy has become my preferred learning source, because what it provides is practical, current, and useful in this era where the business world is being rewritten.

In today's environment where there are so "

– Omar Hernán Montes Parra, CEO at Quantum SFE



Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.