Want FREE Templates on Strategy & Transformation? Download our FREE compilation of 50+ slides. This is an exclusive promotion being run on LinkedIn.







Flevy Management Insights Q&A
What are the strategic considerations for Make vs. Buy in light of emerging blockchain technologies?


This article provides a detailed response to: What are the strategic considerations for Make vs. Buy in light of emerging blockchain technologies? For a comprehensive understanding of Make or Buy, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Make or Buy best practice resources.

TLDR The Make vs. Buy decision in blockchain technology integration requires careful evaluation of strategic objectives, internal capabilities, and alignment with overall Strategy Development, Innovation, and Digital Transformation goals.

Reading time: 5 minutes


In the rapidly evolving landscape of technology, organizations are constantly faced with the decision to Make or Buy when it comes to integrating new technologies into their operations. With the rise of blockchain technology, this decision has become even more critical. Blockchain offers a transformative potential for enhancing transparency, security, and efficiency in various business processes. However, integrating blockchain into an organization's operations requires careful Strategic Planning, considering both the immediate and long-term implications.

Understanding the Strategic Implications of Blockchain

The first step in the Make vs. Buy decision process is understanding the strategic implications of blockchain technology for the organization. Blockchain can revolutionize how an organization manages data, conducts transactions, and interacts with stakeholders. For instance, in supply chain management, blockchain can provide unprecedented transparency and traceability, reducing fraud and errors. In finance, it can streamline processes and reduce costs by eliminating intermediaries. However, the adoption of blockchain technology also involves significant challenges, including technical complexity, regulatory uncertainty, and the need for a robust cybersecurity framework.

Organizations must assess their strategic objectives, market position, and competitive landscape to determine whether blockchain technology can provide a competitive advantage. This involves analyzing the potential Return on Investment (ROI) and comparing it against the costs and risks associated with developing blockchain solutions in-house (Make) versus partnering with external vendors (Buy). It's crucial to consider the organization's capacity for innovation, existing IT infrastructure, and technical expertise when making this decision.

While specific statistics from leading consulting firms on the ROI of blockchain projects are not readily available due to the nascent nature of the technology and confidentiality of business data, reports from firms like Deloitte and PwC highlight the growing interest and investment in blockchain across industries. These reports suggest that organizations are increasingly recognizing blockchain's potential to drive efficiency, transparency, and competitive advantage.

Explore related management topics: Supply Chain Management Competitive Advantage Return on Investment Competitive Landscape

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Make: Developing In-House Blockchain Capabilities

Choosing to develop blockchain solutions in-house allows organizations to tailor the technology to their specific needs. It provides control over the development process, the flexibility to iterate, and the ability to integrate blockchain deeply into existing systems and processes. However, building in-house blockchain capabilities requires significant investment in talent acquisition, training, and research and development. Organizations must have or be willing to develop a strong foundation in blockchain technology, including understanding its limitations and regulatory implications.

The benefits of developing blockchain solutions in-house include the potential for innovation and differentiation in the market. For example, Walmart's in-house development of a blockchain system for supply chain management has set a benchmark in the retail industry for product traceability and safety. However, the challenges are non-trivial, including the need for a substantial upfront investment and the risk of technology obsolescence in a rapidly evolving field.

Organizations considering the Make option must engage in thorough Strategic Planning, assessing their internal capabilities and readiness to adopt new technologies. This includes evaluating the organization's culture, leadership commitment to innovation, and the ability to manage Change Management processes effectively. Additionally, organizations must consider the long-term implications of maintaining and upgrading blockchain solutions, as well as the potential need for partnerships to ensure interoperability and standardization.

Explore related management topics: Change Management Strategic Planning Supply Chain Retail Industry

Buy: Partnering with Blockchain Technology Providers

For many organizations, the Buy option—partnering with external blockchain technology providers—offers a way to leverage the benefits of blockchain without the complexities of developing solutions in-house. This approach allows organizations to tap into the expertise and established solutions of blockchain technology firms, reducing time to market and leveraging proven platforms. Buying also mitigates some of the risks associated with the rapid technological evolution and regulatory changes in the blockchain space.

However, when opting to Buy, organizations must conduct thorough due diligence to select the right partners. This includes evaluating the provider's technical capabilities, track record, understanding of the industry, and the alignment of their solution with the organization's strategic objectives. For example, IBM's blockchain platform has been adopted by numerous organizations across industries, offering a tested and scalable solution for various applications, from supply chain management to financial transactions.

Choosing the Buy option also requires careful consideration of vendor lock-in risks, data security, and compliance with regulatory standards. Organizations must negotiate contracts that ensure flexibility, data portability, and the ability to adapt to changing business needs and technological advancements. Effective partnership management, clear communication of requirements, and ongoing performance management are critical to the success of Buy decisions in the context of blockchain technology adoption.

In summary, the decision to Make or Buy in the context of emerging blockchain technologies involves a complex set of strategic considerations. Organizations must carefully assess their strategic objectives, internal capabilities, and the potential benefits and challenges of blockchain technology. Whether developing in-house blockchain solutions or partnering with external providers, the key to success lies in aligning the decision with the organization's overall Strategy Development, Innovation, and Digital Transformation goals.

Explore related management topics: Digital Transformation Performance Management Strategy Development Due Diligence Make or Buy

Best Practices in Make or Buy

Here are best practices relevant to Make or Buy from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Make or Buy materials here.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Explore all of our best practices in: Make or Buy

Make or Buy Case Studies

For a practical understanding of Make or Buy, take a look at these case studies.

Global Supply Chain Optimization Strategy for Industrial Metals Distributor

Scenario: An established industrial metals distributor is facing a critical "make or buy" decision to improve its global supply chain efficiency.

Read Full Case Study

Telecom Infrastructure Modernization Initiative

Scenario: The organization in question operates within the telecom industry, facing the strategic decision of modernizing its telecommunications infrastructure.

Read Full Case Study

Make or Buy Decision Analysis for Biotech Firm in Specialty Pharmaceuticals

Scenario: A biotech firm specializing in specialty pharmaceuticals faces challenges in optimizing its Make or Buy strategy.

Read Full Case Study

Telecom Infrastructure Outsourcing Strategy

Scenario: The organization is a regional telecom operator facing increased pressure to modernize its infrastructure while managing costs.

Read Full Case Study

Resilience in Retail Expansion for Boutique Fashion Chain in Urban Markets

Scenario: A boutique fashion retail chain is at a crossroads, facing the strategic challenge of deciding whether to build vs.

Read Full Case Study

Strategic Acquisition Plan for a Fintech in the Digital Payments Sector

Scenario: A leading fintech company specializing in digital payments is at a strategic crossroads, deliberating a make-or-buy decision to accelerate its product development and market penetration.

Read Full Case Study


Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies

Related Questions

Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.

How should companies approach the make-or-buy decision in highly regulated industries differently?
In highly regulated industries, companies must adopt a comprehensive approach to the make-or-buy decision, considering Regulatory Compliance, Risk Management, Strategic Alignment, and long-term implications for sustainable success. [Read full explanation]
How do Build vs. Buy decisions influence a company's agility in adapting to new regulatory requirements?
The Build vs. Buy decision significantly impacts organizational agility in regulatory compliance, balancing internal solution development with external acquisitions to optimize operational flexibility and strategic alignment. [Read full explanation]
In what ways can Build vs. Buy decisions influence a company's ability to attract and retain top talent?
Build vs. Buy decisions impact an organization's ability to attract and retain top talent by shaping its Innovation Culture, Skill Development opportunities, and Organizational Culture. [Read full explanation]
How do Make vs. Buy decisions affect the innovation cycle in the manufacturing sector?
Make vs. Buy decisions in the manufacturing sector significantly impact innovation, affecting Core Competencies, speed, flexibility, and investment, with strategic management of these decisions being crucial for fostering innovation and maintaining market leadership. [Read full explanation]
How does the Make vs. Buy decision impact a company's ability to innovate in the face of tightening environmental regulations?
The Make vs. Buy decision significantly impacts a company's innovation capabilities and compliance with environmental regulations, influencing cost, operational efficiency, and sustainability strategy alignment. [Read full explanation]
How does the shift towards remote work influence Make vs. Buy decisions in technology infrastructure?
The shift towards remote work has made Make vs. Buy decisions in technology infrastructure more complex, necessitating deeper analysis of cost, scalability, security, compliance, and Strategic Planning to align with organizational goals. [Read full explanation]
How is the rise of artificial intelligence and automation shaping the make-or-buy decision landscape?
The rise of AI and automation is transforming the make-or-buy decision process, impacting Cost, Operational Excellence, Innovation, and Competitive Strategy, necessitating a nuanced Strategic Planning approach. [Read full explanation]
What factors should manufacturers consider when deciding between Build vs. Buy for entering new markets?
Organizations deciding between Build vs. Buy for new market entry must evaluate market entry speed, cost, control, strategic alignment, and conduct thorough market research and financial analysis. [Read full explanation]

Source: Executive Q&A: Make or Buy Questions, Flevy Management Insights, 2024


Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials



Receive our FREE presentation on Operational Excellence

This 50-slide presentation provides a high-level introduction to the 4 Building Blocks of Operational Excellence. Achieving OpEx requires the implementation of a Business Execution System that integrates these 4 building blocks.