Flevy Management Insights Q&A
What considerations should companies make regarding Make vs. Buy when planning for disaster recovery and business continuity?
     Joseph Robinson    |    Make or Buy


This article provides a detailed response to: What considerations should companies make regarding Make vs. Buy when planning for disaster recovery and business continuity? For a comprehensive understanding of Make or Buy, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Make or Buy best practice resources.

TLDR Organizations deciding between in-house or outsourced Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity solutions must evaluate Cost, Control, Capability, and Compliance to ensure resilience and minimize downtime.

Reading time: 4 minutes

Before we begin, let's review some important management concepts, as they related to this question.

What does Cost-Benefit Analysis mean?
What does Control and Customization mean?
What does Capability and Scalability mean?


When planning for Disaster Recovery (DR) and Business Continuity (BC), organizations face a critical decision: whether to "make" (in-house development and management) or "buy" (outsourcing to third-party providers). This decision is paramount to ensuring resilience, minimizing downtime, and maintaining operational continuity in the face of disruptions. The choice between making vs. buying involves a comprehensive analysis of cost, control, capability, and compliance considerations.

Cost Considerations

Cost is often the most immediate factor organizations consider when deciding between making vs. buying DR and BC solutions. Developing in-house DR and BC capabilities requires significant upfront investment in infrastructure, software, and skilled personnel. According to Gartner, the average cost of IT downtime is approximately $5,600 per minute, which varies significantly among industries. Therefore, the potential savings from preventing downtime must be weighed against the initial and ongoing costs of maintaining in-house capabilities.

Outsourcing DR and BC services can convert fixed capital expenditures into variable costs, aligning expenses with usage and need. This model allows organizations to benefit from the economies of scale and expertise of specialized providers. However, it's crucial to consider the total cost of ownership, including service fees, contract flexibility, and potential costs related to data retrieval and migration in the event of changing providers.

Organizations must conduct a thorough cost-benefit analysis, considering both direct and indirect costs. This analysis should account for the potential loss of revenue, regulatory fines, and reputational damage associated with downtime and data loss. By comparing these costs against the investment required for in-house vs. outsourced solutions, organizations can make an informed decision that aligns with their financial capabilities and risk tolerance.

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Control and Customization

Control over DR and BC processes is a critical consideration for organizations, particularly those in highly regulated industries or with complex operational needs. In-house solutions offer greater control over the design, implementation, and management of DR and BC strategies. This control facilitates customization to meet specific organizational requirements, regulatory compliance, and integration with existing systems and processes.

However, maintaining control requires organizations to invest in skilled personnel and continuous training to ensure expertise in the latest technologies and best practices. This can be a significant challenge in a rapidly evolving IT landscape, where the skills gap is a persistent issue. According to a report by McKinsey, the technology skills gap, especially in cybersecurity and cloud computing, is widening, making it difficult for organizations to maintain the necessary level of expertise in-house.

Outsourcing DR and BC services to specialized providers can alleviate the burden of staying abreast of technological advancements and regulatory changes. Third-party providers typically have dedicated teams focused on DR and BC, offering a level of expertise and resources that may be difficult for individual organizations to replicate. However, this comes at the cost of reduced direct control over the specifics of the DR and BC strategies, which may not be suitable for all organizations.

Capability and Scalability

The capability to effectively respond to and recover from disasters is a function of both the technological infrastructure and the expertise of the personnel involved. In-house solutions require organizations to build and maintain a robust IT infrastructure, capable of supporting DR and BC processes. This includes redundant systems, data backup solutions, and secure remote access for employees.

Scalability is another critical factor. As organizations grow, their DR and BC needs become more complex. In-house solutions must be designed with scalability in mind, requiring ongoing investment in technology and personnel. This can be challenging for organizations with limited resources or those experiencing rapid growth.

Outsourced DR and BC services offer scalable solutions that can adapt to the changing needs of the organization. Providers typically operate multiple data centers and have the infrastructure to support varying levels of demand. This scalability can be particularly advantageous for organizations experiencing growth or fluctuations in their business operations. Moreover, outsourcing allows organizations to leverage advanced technologies, such as cloud-based DR solutions, without the need for significant capital investment.

In conclusion, the decision to make or buy DR and BC solutions requires organizations to carefully consider their specific needs, capabilities, and constraints. By analyzing cost, control, capability, and compliance considerations, organizations can develop a DR and BC strategy that ensures resilience and operational continuity in the face of disasters.

Best Practices in Make or Buy

Here are best practices relevant to Make or Buy from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Make or Buy materials here.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Explore all of our best practices in: Make or Buy

Make or Buy Case Studies

For a practical understanding of Make or Buy, take a look at these case studies.

Telecom Infrastructure Outsourcing Strategy

Scenario: The organization is a regional telecom operator facing increased pressure to modernize its infrastructure while managing costs.

Read Full Case Study

Defense Procurement Strategy for Aerospace Components

Scenario: The organization is a major player in the aerospace defense sector, grappling with the decision to make or buy critical components.

Read Full Case Study

Build vs. Buy Decision Framework for Semiconductor Manufacturer

Scenario: A semiconductor firm in the highly competitive technology sector is grappling with the strategic decision of building in-house capabilities versus buying or licensing from external sources.

Read Full Case Study

Luxury Brand E-commerce Platform Decision

Scenario: A luxury fashion house is grappling with the decision to develop an in-house e-commerce platform or to leverage an existing third-party solution.

Read Full Case Study

Customer Loyalty Program Development in the Cosmetics Industry

Scenario: The organization is a multinational cosmetics enterprise seeking to enhance its competitive edge by establishing a customer loyalty program.

Read Full Case Study

Make or Buy Decision Analysis for a Global Electronics Manufacturer

Scenario: A global electronics manufacturer is grappling with escalating operational costs and supply chain complexities.

Read Full Case Study




Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials

  •  
    "FlevyPro provides business frameworks from many of the global giants in management consulting that allow you to provide best in class solutions for your clients."

    – David Harris, Managing Director at Futures Strategy
  •  
    "As a young consulting firm, requests for input from clients vary and it's sometimes impossible to provide expert solutions across a broad spectrum of requirements. That was before I discovered Flevy.com.

    Through subscription to this invaluable site of a plethora of topics that are key and crucial to consulting, I "

    – Nishi Singh, Strategist and MD at NSP Consultants
  •  
    "As an Independent Management Consultant, I find Flevy to add great value as a source of best practices, templates and information on new trends. Flevy has matured and the quality and quantity of the library is excellent. Lastly the price charged is reasonable, creating a win-win value for "

    – Jim Schoen, Principal at FRC Group
  •  
    "My FlevyPro subscription provides me with the most popular frameworks and decks in demand in today’s market. They not only augment my existing consulting and coaching offerings and delivery, but also keep me abreast of the latest trends, inspire new products and service offerings for my practice, and educate me "

    – Bill Branson, Founder at Strategic Business Architects
  •  
    "As a niche strategic consulting firm, Flevy and FlevyPro frameworks and documents are an on-going reference to help us structure our findings and recommendations to our clients as well as improve their clarity, strength, and visual power. For us, it is an invaluable resource to increase our impact and value."

    – David Coloma, Consulting Area Manager at Cynertia Consulting
  •  
    "The wide selection of frameworks is very useful to me as an independent consultant. In fact, it rivals what I had at my disposal at Big 4 Consulting firms in terms of efficacy and organization."

    – Julia T., Consulting Firm Owner (Former Manager at Deloitte and Capgemini)
  •  
    "I am extremely grateful for the proactiveness and eagerness to help and I would gladly recommend the Flevy team if you are looking for data and toolkits to help you work through business solutions."

    – Trevor Booth, Partner, Fast Forward Consulting
  •  
    "I have used Flevy services for a number of years and have never, ever been disappointed. As a matter of fact, David and his team continue, time after time, to impress me with their willingness to assist and in the real sense of the word. I have concluded in fact "

    – Roberto Pelliccia, Senior Executive in International Hospitality



Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.