This article provides a detailed response to: What considerations should companies make regarding Make vs. Buy when planning for disaster recovery and business continuity? For a comprehensive understanding of Make or Buy, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Make or Buy best practice resources.
TLDR Organizations deciding between in-house or outsourced Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity solutions must evaluate Cost, Control, Capability, and Compliance to ensure resilience and minimize downtime.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Overview Cost Considerations Control and Customization Capability and Scalability Best Practices in Make or Buy Make or Buy Case Studies Related Questions
All Recommended Topics
Before we begin, let's review some important management concepts, as they related to this question.
When planning for Disaster Recovery (DR) and Business Continuity (BC), organizations face a critical decision: whether to "make" (in-house development and management) or "buy" (outsourcing to third-party providers). This decision is paramount to ensuring resilience, minimizing downtime, and maintaining operational continuity in the face of disruptions. The choice between making vs. buying involves a comprehensive analysis of cost, control, capability, and compliance considerations.
Cost Considerations
Cost is often the most immediate factor organizations consider when deciding between making vs. buying DR and BC solutions. Developing in-house DR and BC capabilities requires significant upfront investment in infrastructure, software, and skilled personnel. According to Gartner, the average cost of IT downtime is approximately $5,600 per minute, which varies significantly among industries. Therefore, the potential savings from preventing downtime must be weighed against the initial and ongoing costs of maintaining in-house capabilities.
Outsourcing DR and BC services can convert fixed capital expenditures into variable costs, aligning expenses with usage and need. This model allows organizations to benefit from the economies of scale and expertise of specialized providers. However, it's crucial to consider the total cost of ownership, including service fees, contract flexibility, and potential costs related to data retrieval and migration in the event of changing providers.
Organizations must conduct a thorough cost-benefit analysis, considering both direct and indirect costs. This analysis should account for the potential loss of revenue, regulatory fines, and reputational damage associated with downtime and data loss. By comparing these costs against the investment required for in-house vs. outsourced solutions, organizations can make an informed decision that aligns with their financial capabilities and risk tolerance.
Control and Customization
Control over DR and BC processes is a critical consideration for organizations, particularly those in highly regulated industries or with complex operational needs. In-house solutions offer greater control over the design, implementation, and management of DR and BC strategies. This control facilitates customization to meet specific organizational requirements, regulatory compliance, and integration with existing systems and processes.
However, maintaining control requires organizations to invest in skilled personnel and continuous training to ensure expertise in the latest technologies and best practices. This can be a significant challenge in a rapidly evolving IT landscape, where the skills gap is a persistent issue. According to a report by McKinsey, the technology skills gap, especially in cybersecurity and cloud computing, is widening, making it difficult for organizations to maintain the necessary level of expertise in-house.
Outsourcing DR and BC services to specialized providers can alleviate the burden of staying abreast of technological advancements and regulatory changes. Third-party providers typically have dedicated teams focused on DR and BC, offering a level of expertise and resources that may be difficult for individual organizations to replicate. However, this comes at the cost of reduced direct control over the specifics of the DR and BC strategies, which may not be suitable for all organizations.
Capability and Scalability
The capability to effectively respond to and recover from disasters is a function of both the technological infrastructure and the expertise of the personnel involved. In-house solutions require organizations to build and maintain a robust IT infrastructure, capable of supporting DR and BC processes. This includes redundant systems, data backup solutions, and secure remote access for employees.
Scalability is another critical factor. As organizations grow, their DR and BC needs become more complex. In-house solutions must be designed with scalability in mind, requiring ongoing investment in technology and personnel. This can be challenging for organizations with limited resources or those experiencing rapid growth.
Outsourced DR and BC services offer scalable solutions that can adapt to the changing needs of the organization. Providers typically operate multiple data centers and have the infrastructure to support varying levels of demand. This scalability can be particularly advantageous for organizations experiencing growth or fluctuations in their business operations. Moreover, outsourcing allows organizations to leverage advanced technologies, such as cloud-based DR solutions, without the need for significant capital investment.
In conclusion, the decision to make or buy DR and BC solutions requires organizations to carefully consider their specific needs, capabilities, and constraints. By analyzing cost, control, capability, and compliance considerations, organizations can develop a DR and BC strategy that ensures resilience and operational continuity in the face of disasters.
Best Practices in Make or Buy
Here are best practices relevant to Make or Buy from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Make or Buy materials here.
Explore all of our best practices in: Make or Buy
Make or Buy Case Studies
For a practical understanding of Make or Buy, take a look at these case studies.
Telecom Infrastructure Outsourcing Strategy
Scenario: The organization is a regional telecom operator facing increased pressure to modernize its infrastructure while managing costs.
Defense Procurement Strategy for Aerospace Components
Scenario: The organization is a major player in the aerospace defense sector, grappling with the decision to make or buy critical components.
Customer Loyalty Program Development in the Cosmetics Industry
Scenario: The organization is a multinational cosmetics enterprise seeking to enhance its competitive edge by establishing a customer loyalty program.
Luxury Brand E-commerce Platform Decision
Scenario: A luxury fashion house is grappling with the decision to develop an in-house e-commerce platform or to leverage an existing third-party solution.
Make or Buy Decision Analysis for a Global Electronics Manufacturer
Scenario: A global electronics manufacturer is grappling with escalating operational costs and supply chain complexities.
Global Supply Chain Optimization Strategy for Industrial Metals Distributor
Scenario: An established industrial metals distributor is facing a critical "make or buy" decision to improve its global supply chain efficiency.
Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies
Related Questions
Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.
Source: Executive Q&A: Make or Buy Questions, Flevy Management Insights, 2024
Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.
Leverage the Experience of Experts.
Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.
Download Immediately and Use.
Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.
Save Time, Effort, and Money.
Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.
