Flevy Management Insights Q&A

What are the challenges of aligning ISO 22301 with enterprise risk management frameworks?

     Joseph Robinson    |    ISO 22301


This article provides a detailed response to: What are the challenges of aligning ISO 22301 with enterprise risk management frameworks? For a comprehensive understanding of ISO 22301, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to ISO 22301 best practice resources.

TLDR Aligning ISO 22301 with ERM frameworks involves addressing cultural and operational differences, resource allocation challenges, and integration complexities, requiring strategic planning, collaboration, and technology use for effective resilience and risk management.

Reading time: 5 minutes

Before we begin, let's review some important management concepts, as they relate to this question.

What does Alignment of Frameworks mean?
What does Resource Allocation mean?
What does Continuous Improvement mean?


ISO 22301, the international standard for Business Continuity Management (BCM), provides a framework for organizations to plan, establish, implement, operate, monitor, review, maintain, and continually improve a documented management system to protect against, reduce the likelihood of occurrence, respond to, and recover from disruptive incidents. Aligning ISO 22301 with Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) frameworks presents several challenges, from cultural differences and integration complexities to resource allocation and measurement difficulties. Addressing these challenges effectively is crucial for organizations aiming to enhance their resilience and risk management capabilities.

Understanding the Alignment Challenges

The first challenge in aligning ISO 22301 with ERM frameworks lies in the inherent differences between the two approaches. While ISO 22301 focuses specifically on business continuity and resilience, ERM frameworks such as COSO or ISO 31000 offer a broader perspective on risk management, encompassing a wide range of risks that can affect an organization's objectives. This difference in scope can lead to challenges in ensuring that the business continuity management system (BCMS) is effectively integrated into the wider ERM strategy, potentially resulting in gaps in risk coverage or duplication of efforts. Organizations must carefully map out the specific requirements of ISO 22301 within their ERM framework to ensure a comprehensive approach to risk management and business continuity.

Another significant challenge is the cultural and operational integration of ISO 22301 with existing ERM frameworks. This involves aligning the objectives, terminology, and practices of the BCMS with those of the ERM framework, which can be difficult due to differences in focus and methodology. For example, ERM frameworks typically adopt a top-down approach to risk management, focusing on strategic risks and their impact on organizational objectives. In contrast, ISO 22301 requires a more operational focus, emphasizing the importance of detailed planning and preparation to ensure business continuity. Bridging this gap requires a concerted effort to foster a culture of collaboration and mutual understanding among all stakeholders involved in risk management and business continuity planning.

Resource allocation poses another challenge. Implementing and maintaining a BCMS in accordance with ISO 22301 standards requires significant investment in terms of time, money, and human resources. When attempting to align this with an ERM framework, organizations must carefully balance these requirements against the broader needs of the risk management program. This can lead to conflicts over resource allocation, as different departments compete for limited resources to address their specific risk management and business continuity needs. Organizations must develop a strategic approach to resource allocation that supports both the BCMS and the ERM framework, ensuring that all aspects of risk management and business continuity are adequately resourced.

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Strategies for Effective Alignment

To address these challenges, organizations can adopt several strategies to effectively align ISO 22301 with their ERM frameworks. One effective approach is to establish a cross-functional team comprising members from both the BCM and ERM functions. This team can work to identify and address any gaps or overlaps between the two frameworks, ensuring a cohesive and comprehensive approach to risk management and business continuity. By fostering collaboration and communication between these functions, organizations can ensure that their BCMS is fully integrated into the broader ERM strategy.

Another strategy involves leveraging technology to facilitate integration. Many organizations are turning to risk management software that supports both BCM and ERM processes. These tools can help organizations to streamline data collection, risk assessment, and reporting processes, making it easier to align ISO 22301 with their ERM framework. By providing a single source of truth for risk management data, these technologies can enhance visibility and coordination across the organization, supporting more effective decision-making and resource allocation.

Finally, organizations should focus on continuous improvement and learning. This involves regularly reviewing and updating both the BCMS and the ERM framework to reflect changes in the external environment, organizational objectives, and emerging best practices in risk management and business continuity. By adopting a proactive approach to learning and adaptation, organizations can ensure that their risk management and business continuity practices remain aligned and effective in the face of evolving challenges.

Real-World Examples

Many leading organizations have successfully aligned ISO 22301 with their ERM frameworks through these strategies. For example, a global financial services firm implemented a cross-functional team to oversee the integration of its BCMS with its ERM framework. This team was responsible for identifying and addressing any gaps or overlaps between the two, resulting in a more cohesive and comprehensive approach to risk management. The firm also leveraged risk management software to facilitate this integration, enhancing visibility and coordination across the organization.

Another example is a multinational manufacturing company that focused on continuous improvement and learning to align its BCMS with its ERM framework. The company regularly reviewed and updated its risk management and business continuity practices to reflect emerging risks and best practices. This proactive approach enabled the company to maintain a high level of resilience and adaptability, even in the face of significant disruptions such as natural disasters and supply chain interruptions.

These examples highlight the importance of strategic planning, collaboration, and the use of technology in aligning ISO 22301 with ERM frameworks. By addressing the challenges and leveraging the strategies discussed above, organizations can enhance their resilience and risk management capabilities, ensuring that they are well-prepared to respond to and recover from disruptive incidents.

Best Practices in ISO 22301

Here are best practices relevant to ISO 22301 from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our ISO 22301 materials here.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Explore all of our best practices in: ISO 22301

ISO 22301 Case Studies

For a practical understanding of ISO 22301, take a look at these case studies.

ISO 22301 Business Continuity Management System Implementation for a Global Financial Firm

Scenario: A global financial firm is seeking to implement an ISO 22301 Business Continuity Management System (BCMS) to ensure its ability to continue critical business operations during unforeseen disruptions.

Read Full Case Study

Business Continuity Strategy for Retail Firm in Competitive Market

Scenario: A prominent retail company specializing in high-end consumer electronics faces challenges aligning its operations with ISO 22301 standards.

Read Full Case Study

Business Continuity Management Implementation for a Global Financial Institution

Scenario: A global financial institution is faced with the challenge of ensuring business continuity amid increasing geopolitical risks and cyber threats.

Read Full Case Study

Business Continuity Management for Professional Services Firm

Scenario: A professional services firm specializing in cybersecurity advisory has experienced a significant increase in demand for its services due to rising cyber threats.

Read Full Case Study

ISO 22301 Business Continuity Strategy for Life Sciences in North America

Scenario: A firm in the life sciences sector, specializing in biotechnological advancements, faces challenges aligning its operations with ISO 22301 standards.

Read Full Case Study

Business Continuity Management for Real Estate Firm in High-Density Urban Area

Scenario: A real estate firm based in a high-density urban area is seeking to align its operations with ISO 22301 standards.

Read Full Case Study


Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies

Related Questions

Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.

What strategies can companies employ to ensure employee engagement and compliance with ISO 22301 standards?
Companies can ensure employee engagement and compliance with ISO 22301 by fostering a Culture of Preparedness, providing comprehensive Training and Awareness programs, and leveraging Technology and Tools for enhanced compliance and resilience. [Read full explanation]
How does ISO 22301 guide the recovery time objective (RTO) and recovery point objective (RPO) setting process?
ISO 22301 provides a framework for Business Continuity Management, guiding organizations in setting realistic Recovery Time Objectives (RTO) and Recovery Point Objectives (RPO) through Business Impact Analysis, strategic planning, technology use, and continuous improvement. [Read full explanation]
What metrics are most effective for measuring the performance of an ISO 22301-compliant business continuity plan?
Effective metrics for ISO 22301-compliant Business Continuity Plans include Recovery Time Objective (RTO), Recovery Point Objective (RPO), Incident Response Time and Effectiveness, and Business Impact Analysis (BIA) Conformance, all critical for evaluating resilience and recovery capabilities. [Read full explanation]
What role does technology play in facilitating the implementation and maintenance of ISO 22301 standards?
Technology enhances ISO 22301 compliance by automating Business Continuity Management, improving Communication and Collaboration, and enabling Continuous Monitoring and Improvement for Operational Excellence. [Read full explanation]
How does ISO 22301 facilitate a culture of resilience within organizations?
ISO 22301 fosters organizational resilience through Strategic Alignment, Employee Engagement, and Continuous Improvement, ensuring readiness against disruptions and sustaining long-term success. [Read full explanation]
What are the critical components of a business continuity plan under ISO 22301?
A comprehensive Business Continuity Plan under ISO 22301 includes Understanding Organization's Needs, Leadership and Commitment, Business Continuity Strategies and Solutions, and Incident Response, Communication, and Management to ensure operational resilience. [Read full explanation]

 
Joseph Robinson, New York

Operational Excellence, Management Consulting

This Q&A article was reviewed by Joseph Robinson. Joseph is the VP of Strategy at Flevy with expertise in Corporate Strategy and Operational Excellence. Prior to Flevy, Joseph worked at the Boston Consulting Group. He also has an MBA from MIT Sloan.

It is licensed under CC BY 4.0. You're free to share and adapt with attribution. To cite this article, please use:

Source: "What are the challenges of aligning ISO 22301 with enterprise risk management frameworks?," Flevy Management Insights, Joseph Robinson, 2025




Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials

 
"As a consulting firm, we had been creating subject matter training materials for our people and found the excellent materials on Flevy, which saved us 100's of hours of re-creating what already exists on the Flevy materials we purchased."

– Michael Evans, Managing Director at Newport LLC
 
"As a niche strategic consulting firm, Flevy and FlevyPro frameworks and documents are an on-going reference to help us structure our findings and recommendations to our clients as well as improve their clarity, strength, and visual power. For us, it is an invaluable resource to increase our impact and value."

– David Coloma, Consulting Area Manager at Cynertia Consulting
 
"Flevy is now a part of my business routine. I visit Flevy at least 3 times each month.

Flevy has become my preferred learning source, because what it provides is practical, current, and useful in this era where the business world is being rewritten.

In today's environment where there are so "

– Omar Hernán Montes Parra, CEO at Quantum SFE
 
"FlevyPro provides business frameworks from many of the global giants in management consulting that allow you to provide best in class solutions for your clients."

– David Harris, Managing Director at Futures Strategy
 
"Flevy is our 'go to' resource for management material, at an affordable cost. The Flevy library is comprehensive and the content deep, and typically provides a great foundation for us to further develop and tailor our own service offer."

– Chris McCann, Founder at Resilient.World
 
"As a young consulting firm, requests for input from clients vary and it's sometimes impossible to provide expert solutions across a broad spectrum of requirements. That was before I discovered Flevy.com.

Through subscription to this invaluable site of a plethora of topics that are key and crucial to consulting, I "

– Nishi Singh, Strategist and MD at NSP Consultants
 
"I like your product. I'm frequently designing PowerPoint presentations for my company and your product has given me so many great ideas on the use of charts, layouts, tools, and frameworks. I really think the templates are a valuable asset to the job."

– Roberto Fuentes Martinez, Senior Executive Director at Technology Transformation Advisory
 
"I have used FlevyPro for several business applications. It is a great complement to working with expensive consultants. The quality and effectiveness of the tools are of the highest standards."

– Moritz Bernhoerster, Global Sourcing Director at Fortune 500



Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Curve, and many more.