This article provides a detailed response to: How should companies evaluate the scalability of Build vs. Buy options in their IT strategy? For a comprehensive understanding of Build vs. Buy, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Build vs. Buy best practice resources.
TLDR Companies should evaluate Build vs. Buy options in IT strategy by analyzing strategic implications, cost, resource needs, and scalability to align with business objectives and technological requirements.
Before we begin, let's review some important management concepts, as they related to this question.
Evaluating the scalability of Build vs. Buy options in an organization's IT strategy is a critical decision that can significantly impact its operational efficiency, innovation capabilities, and competitive edge. This decision-making process involves analyzing various factors such as cost, time to market, customization needs, and long-term strategic goals. By carefully considering these elements, organizations can make informed choices that align with their business objectives and technological requirements.
Understanding the Strategic Implications
When considering Build vs. Buy, organizations must first understand the strategic implications of each option. Building custom solutions allows for tailored features and functionalities that precisely meet specific business needs. It offers greater control over the development process, potentially leading to a competitive advantage if the solution significantly enhances operational efficiency or customer experience. However, this approach requires significant investment in terms of time, resources, and expertise. According to Gartner, custom-built solutions can lead to higher long-term maintenance costs and may pose scalability challenges as the organization grows and its needs evolve.
On the other hand, buying off-the-shelf software can be more cost-effective and allows for quicker implementation. Vendors often provide continuous updates and support, reducing the burden on internal IT staff. However, organizations may face limitations in terms of customization and dependency on the vendor for critical updates and feature enhancements. A study by McKinsey highlighted that companies prioritizing speed and efficiency in their digital transformation efforts often favor buying solutions to leverage existing technologies and accelerate time to value.
Strategic Planning plays a crucial role in this decision-making process. Organizations must align their IT strategy with their overall business strategy, considering how the Build or Buy decision will support their long-term goals. For instance, a company focusing on innovation and market differentiation might lean towards building custom solutions, while a company aiming for quick market entry and operational efficiency might prefer buying.
Assessing Cost and Resource Implications
Cost is a pivotal factor in the Build vs. Buy decision. Building custom IT solutions often requires upfront investment in development, which includes hiring skilled developers, investing in technology infrastructure, and allocating resources for ongoing maintenance and support. According to Deloitte, the total cost of ownership for custom-built software must include not only initial development costs but also long-term expenses related to upgrades, security, compliance, and scalability. These costs can be significant, especially for complex projects or those requiring cutting-edge technology expertise.
Conversely, buying software typically involves licensing fees, subscription costs, and potentially, costs for additional customization or integration services. While the initial expenditure may be lower compared to building, organizations need to consider the total cost of ownership over the software's lifecycle, including upgrade and support costs. PwC reports that organizations often underestimate the long-term costs associated with bought solutions, particularly when they require extensive customization to fit the company's needs.
Resource implications also play a critical role. Organizations must assess their internal capabilities and determine whether they have the necessary skills and expertise to develop and maintain a custom solution. If not, the costs and time required to build these capabilities or hire external talent must be factored into the decision. For bought solutions, the focus shifts to evaluating the vendor's ability to provide reliable support and continuous innovation to meet the organization's evolving needs.
Evaluating Scalability and Flexibility
Scalability is a key consideration in the Build vs. Buy debate. Organizations need solutions that can grow and adapt as their business evolves. Custom-built solutions offer the benefit of being designed with specific scalability requirements in mind. However, achieving this requires foresight and a deep understanding of future needs, which can be challenging to predict accurately. Accenture's research indicates that scalable custom solutions necessitate a modular architecture that allows for easy adaptation and integration with new technologies, a task that requires significant architectural expertise.
Buying software, while potentially less flexible in terms of customization, often provides scalability through vendor-managed updates and cloud-based solutions. Vendors typically invest heavily in ensuring their products can scale to meet the demands of a broad customer base, which can benefit organizations without the need to invest directly in scalability features. According to Forrester, leveraging cloud-based SaaS solutions can significantly reduce scalability concerns, as these platforms are designed to handle varying levels of demand and can be easily adjusted to meet changing business requirements.
Ultimately, the decision to build or buy should be based on a comprehensive analysis of the organization's current and future needs, strategic goals, cost considerations, and internal capabilities. Real-world examples, such as Netflix's decision to build its content delivery network (CDN) to ensure optimal streaming performance worldwide, illustrate the benefits of custom solutions for specific strategic needs. Conversely, small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) often find value in buying SaaS solutions to manage their CRM or ERP needs, benefiting from the scalability and efficiency these solutions offer without the need for significant upfront investment in development.
Best Practices in Build vs. Buy
Here are best practices relevant to Build vs. Buy from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Build vs. Buy materials here.
Explore all of our best practices in: Build vs. Buy
Build vs. Buy Case Studies
For a practical understanding of Build vs. Buy, take a look at these case studies.
Telecom Infrastructure Outsourcing Strategy
Scenario: The organization is a regional telecom operator facing increased pressure to modernize its infrastructure while managing costs.
Defense Procurement Strategy for Aerospace Components
Scenario: The organization is a major player in the aerospace defense sector, grappling with the decision to make or buy critical components.
Customer Loyalty Program Development in the Cosmetics Industry
Scenario: The organization is a multinational cosmetics enterprise seeking to enhance its competitive edge by establishing a customer loyalty program.
Luxury Brand E-commerce Platform Decision
Scenario: A luxury fashion house is grappling with the decision to develop an in-house e-commerce platform or to leverage an existing third-party solution.
Make or Buy Decision Analysis for a Global Electronics Manufacturer
Scenario: A global electronics manufacturer is grappling with escalating operational costs and supply chain complexities.
Global Supply Chain Optimization Strategy for Industrial Metals Distributor
Scenario: An established industrial metals distributor is facing a critical "make or buy" decision to improve its global supply chain efficiency.
Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies
Related Questions
Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.
Source: Executive Q&A: Build vs. Buy Questions, Flevy Management Insights, 2024
Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.
Leverage the Experience of Experts.
Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.
Download Immediately and Use.
Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.
Save Time, Effort, and Money.
Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.
