Flevy Management Insights Q&A

How does the emergence of quantum computing affect the strategic Build vs. Buy decisions in data security and encryption?

     Joseph Robinson    |    Build vs. Buy


This article provides a detailed response to: How does the emergence of quantum computing affect the strategic Build vs. Buy decisions in data security and encryption? For a comprehensive understanding of Build vs. Buy, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Build vs. Buy best practice resources.

TLDR The emergence of quantum computing necessitates a strategic reevaluation of Build vs. Buy decisions in data security, urging immediate action towards quantum-resistant encryption to mitigate future risks.

Reading time: 5 minutes

Before we begin, let's review some important management concepts, as they related to this question.

What does Build vs. Buy Decision-Making mean?
What does Quantum-Resistant Encryption Strategies mean?
What does Risk Assessment in Data Security mean?


The emergence of quantum computing represents a paradigm shift in the computational landscape, with profound implications for data security and encryption. As organizations navigate this new terrain, the strategic decision between building in-house capabilities or buying external solutions becomes increasingly complex. This decision is critical, as quantum computing has the potential to render traditional encryption methods obsolete, thereby exposing organizations to unprecedented security vulnerabilities.

Understanding the Quantum Threat to Encryption

Quantum computing operates fundamentally differently from classical computing, leveraging the principles of quantum mechanics to process information. Its power lies in its ability to perform complex calculations at speeds unattainable by current computers. Specifically, quantum computers can solve certain types of problems, such as factoring large numbers, exponentially faster than the best-known algorithms running on classical computers. This capability threatens the security of encryption algorithms that underpin much of today's digital security, including RSA and ECC, which rely on the difficulty of factoring large numbers or solving discrete logarithm problems.

Organizations must recognize that the quantum threat is not a distant future concern but an imminent issue requiring immediate strategic planning. The concept of "quantum supremacy," where quantum computers can perform tasks that classical computers practically cannot, has already been demonstrated. While widespread commercial availability of quantum computers capable of breaking current encryption standards may still be years away, the data encrypted today could be at risk sooner if not protected with quantum-resistant algorithms.

The strategic implications are clear: organizations must begin preparing now for a post-quantum world. This preparation involves a thorough assessment of current encryption practices and the development of a roadmap towards adopting quantum-resistant encryption methods. Failure to act timely could expose organizations to significant risks, including data breaches, loss of intellectual property, and erosion of customer trust.

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Strategic Considerations for Build vs. Buy in Quantum-Resistant Solutions

When it comes to adapting to quantum-resistant encryption, organizations face a critical Build vs. Buy decision. Building in-house capabilities requires significant investment in research and development, talent acquisition, and technology infrastructure. It offers the advantage of tailored solutions that closely align with specific organizational needs and strategic objectives. However, the complexity and novelty of quantum-resistant encryption pose considerable challenges, requiring expertise that is currently scarce and expensive.

On the other hand, buying or partnering with external vendors for quantum-resistant solutions offers a faster, potentially more cost-effective path to securing data against quantum threats. Many vendors are already developing quantum-safe encryption products and services, leveraging their specialized knowledge and economies of scale. This approach allows organizations to benefit from the latest advancements in the field without the need for substantial upfront investment in research and development.

The decision between building or buying should be informed by a comprehensive analysis of the organization's specific needs, capabilities, and risk exposure. Factors to consider include the sensitivity and volume of data requiring protection, the organization's risk tolerance, the availability of resources for in-house development, and the strategic importance of maintaining control over encryption technologies. Ultimately, the choice may involve a hybrid approach, combining in-house development of critical components with the acquisition of external solutions for other areas.

Real-World Examples and Best Practices

Several leading organizations are already taking proactive steps to address the quantum threat. For example, Google announced in 2019 that it had achieved quantum supremacy, highlighting the urgency for encryption that can withstand quantum attacks. In response, technology firms and government agencies worldwide are investing in the development of quantum-resistant encryption standards. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in the United States is in the process of evaluating new cryptographic standards that are secure against quantum attacks, with final selections expected soon.

Best practices for organizations navigating the transition to quantum-resistant encryption include conducting a quantum risk assessment to identify and prioritize vulnerable systems and data, engaging with industry consortia and standard-setting bodies to stay abreast of developments in quantum-resistant technologies, and adopting a phased approach to implementation, starting with the most sensitive data.

Furthermore, organizations should consider the broader implications of quantum computing beyond encryption, including its potential to drive innovation in fields such as material science, pharmaceuticals, and artificial intelligence. By adopting a proactive and strategic approach to quantum computing, organizations can not only protect themselves against future threats but also position themselves to capitalize on new opportunities.

In conclusion, the emergence of quantum computing necessitates a reevaluation of traditional encryption methods and a strategic approach to securing data in a post-quantum world. Whether building in-house capabilities or buying external solutions, organizations must act with foresight and agility to navigate the quantum challenge successfully.

Best Practices in Build vs. Buy

Here are best practices relevant to Build vs. Buy from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Build vs. Buy materials here.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Explore all of our best practices in: Build vs. Buy

Build vs. Buy Case Studies

For a practical understanding of Build vs. Buy, take a look at these case studies.

Defense Procurement Strategy for Aerospace Components

Scenario: The organization is a major player in the aerospace defense sector, grappling with the decision to make or buy critical components.

Read Full Case Study

Telecom Infrastructure Outsourcing Strategy

Scenario: The organization is a regional telecom operator facing increased pressure to modernize its infrastructure while managing costs.

Read Full Case Study

Build vs. Buy Decision Framework for Semiconductor Manufacturer

Scenario: A semiconductor firm in the highly competitive technology sector is grappling with the strategic decision of building in-house capabilities versus buying or licensing from external sources.

Read Full Case Study

Luxury Brand E-commerce Platform Decision

Scenario: A luxury fashion house is grappling with the decision to develop an in-house e-commerce platform or to leverage an existing third-party solution.

Read Full Case Study

Make or Buy Decision Analysis for a Global Electronics Manufacturer

Scenario: A global electronics manufacturer is grappling with escalating operational costs and supply chain complexities.

Read Full Case Study

Make or Buy Decision Analysis for Luxury Goods Manufacturer

Scenario: The organization in question is a high-end luxury goods manufacturer facing challenges in deciding whether to make components in-house or outsource to third-party vendors.

Read Full Case Study


Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies

Related Questions

Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.

How should companies approach the make-or-buy decision in highly regulated industries differently?
In highly regulated industries, companies must adopt a comprehensive approach to the make-or-buy decision, considering Regulatory Compliance, Risk Management, Strategic Alignment, and long-term implications for sustainable success. [Read full explanation]
What is a make or buy analysis?
A make or buy analysis is a strategic framework for deciding whether to produce a product in-house or purchase it from an external supplier, considering cost, quality, and risk. [Read full explanation]
What are the key indicators that suggest a company should pivot from a "Buy" to a "Build" strategy, or vice versa, in response to market changes?
Discover when to pivot from a Buy to a Build strategy (or vice versa) by evaluating Cost, Time to Market, Core Competencies, and Strategic Fit for competitive advantage. [Read full explanation]
What role does corporate social responsibility (CSR) play in the Build vs. Buy decision-making process?
Integrating Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) into Strategic Planning and Operational Excellence influences the Build vs. Buy decision, enhancing brand reputation, sustainability, and market competitiveness. [Read full explanation]
What impact do global supply chain disruptions have on the make-or-buy decision-making process?
Global supply chain disruptions significantly impact the make-or-buy decision-making process, emphasizing Risk Management, Strategic Alignment, Operational Excellence, and the need for agility, resilience, and innovation in sourcing strategies. [Read full explanation]
In what ways can the make-or-buy decision impact a company's sustainability goals and practices?
The make-or-buy decision significantly impacts an organization's sustainability by influencing environmental stewardship, social responsibility, and economic viability through direct control or supply chain influence. [Read full explanation]

 
Joseph Robinson, New York

Operational Excellence, Management Consulting

This Q&A article was reviewed by Joseph Robinson. Joseph is the VP of Strategy at Flevy with expertise in Corporate Strategy and Operational Excellence. Prior to Flevy, Joseph worked at the Boston Consulting Group. He also has an MBA from MIT Sloan.

To cite this article, please use:

Source: "How does the emergence of quantum computing affect the strategic Build vs. Buy decisions in data security and encryption?," Flevy Management Insights, Joseph Robinson, 2025




Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials

 
"Flevy is now a part of my business routine. I visit Flevy at least 3 times each month.

Flevy has become my preferred learning source, because what it provides is practical, current, and useful in this era where the business world is being rewritten.

In today's environment where there are so "

– Omar Hernán Montes Parra, CEO at Quantum SFE
 
"I have used Flevy services for a number of years and have never, ever been disappointed. As a matter of fact, David and his team continue, time after time, to impress me with their willingness to assist and in the real sense of the word. I have concluded in fact "

– Roberto Pelliccia, Senior Executive in International Hospitality
 
"[Flevy] produces some great work that has been/continues to be of immense help not only to myself, but as I seek to provide professional services to my clients, it gives me a large "tool box" of resources that are critical to provide them with the quality of service and outcomes they are expecting."

– Royston Knowles, Executive with 50+ Years of Board Level Experience
 
"The wide selection of frameworks is very useful to me as an independent consultant. In fact, it rivals what I had at my disposal at Big 4 Consulting firms in terms of efficacy and organization."

– Julia T., Consulting Firm Owner (Former Manager at Deloitte and Capgemini)
 
"Flevy.com has proven to be an invaluable resource library to our Independent Management Consultancy, supporting and enabling us to better serve our enterprise clients.

The value derived from our [FlevyPro] subscription in terms of the business it has helped to gain far exceeds the investment made, making a subscription a no-brainer for any growing consultancy – or in-house strategy team."

– Dean Carlton, Chief Transformation Officer, Global Village Transformations Pty Ltd.
 
"One of the great discoveries that I have made for my business is the Flevy library of training materials.

As a Lean Transformation Expert, I am always making presentations to clients on a variety of topics: Training, Transformation, Total Productive Maintenance, Culture, Coaching, Tools, Leadership Behavior, etc. Flevy "

– Ed Kemmerling, Senior Lean Transformation Expert at PMG
 
"FlevyPro provides business frameworks from many of the global giants in management consulting that allow you to provide best in class solutions for your clients."

– David Harris, Managing Director at Futures Strategy
 
"FlevyPro has been a brilliant resource for me, as an independent growth consultant, to access a vast knowledge bank of presentations to support my work with clients. In terms of RoI, the value I received from the very first presentation I downloaded paid for my subscription many times over! The "

– Roderick Cameron, Founding Partner at SGFE Ltd



Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.