Flevy Management Insights Q&A

How are companies leveraging the Internet of Things (IoT) in their Build vs. Buy decisions to improve operational efficiency?

     Joseph Robinson    |    Build vs. Buy


This article provides a detailed response to: How are companies leveraging the Internet of Things (IoT) in their Build vs. Buy decisions to improve operational efficiency? For a comprehensive understanding of Build vs. Buy, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Build vs. Buy best practice resources.

TLDR Organizations are leveraging IoT in Build vs. Buy decisions by aligning these choices with Strategic Planning, assessing internal capabilities and Risk Management, to significantly improve Operational Efficiency and customer satisfaction.

Reading time: 4 minutes

Before we begin, let's review some important management concepts, as they relate to this question.

What does Strategic Planning mean?
What does Innovation and Technology Leadership mean?
What does Risk Management mean?
What does Operational Excellence mean?


In the era of digital transformation, organizations are increasingly turning to the Internet of Things (IoT) to enhance operational efficiency. This technological advancement offers a plethora of opportunities for improving processes, reducing costs, and optimizing performance. However, when it comes to integrating IoT solutions into their operations, organizations face a critical decision: to build their own IoT solutions or to buy them from external providers. This decision is pivotal in determining the success of their IoT strategy and, ultimately, their competitive advantage in the market.

Strategic Considerations in Build vs. Buy Decisions

When assessing whether to build or buy IoT solutions, organizations must consider several strategic factors. First, the decision should align with the overall Strategic Planning of the organization. For organizations with a strong focus on Innovation and Technology Leadership, building custom IoT solutions may offer a competitive edge by enabling unique functionalities tailored to specific operational needs. On the other hand, buying off-the-shelf solutions can be a more cost-effective and time-efficient approach for organizations prioritizing quick deployment and Operational Excellence.

Second, the decision should take into account the organization's internal capabilities and resources. Developing IoT solutions in-house requires a significant investment in Research and Development, skilled personnel, and technology infrastructure. Organizations must evaluate whether they possess the requisite expertise and resources to undertake such projects. Conversely, buying solutions allows organizations to leverage the expertise and investments of specialized IoT providers, potentially accelerating the path to value realization.

Lastly, Risk Management considerations are paramount. Building custom solutions may introduce risks related to project delays, cost overruns, and technical challenges. Buying solutions, while potentially reducing these risks, introduces dependency on external vendors and concerns about integration with existing systems and data security. Organizations must carefully assess these risks in the context of their specific operational environment and strategic objectives.

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Operational Efficiency Gains through IoT

Regardless of the approach chosen, the integration of IoT technologies has the potential to significantly improve operational efficiency. For instance, IoT-enabled predictive maintenance can drastically reduce downtime by forecasting equipment failures before they occur. This not only saves on repair costs but also enhances productivity and extends the lifespan of assets. Similarly, IoT applications in supply chain management can provide real-time visibility into logistics, inventory levels, and supplier performance, enabling more efficient resource allocation and reducing waste.

Moreover, IoT can play a crucial role in enhancing customer satisfaction and loyalty. By collecting and analyzing data from IoT devices, organizations can gain insights into customer behavior and preferences, allowing for more personalized and responsive services. This data-driven approach can lead to improved product quality, faster response times, and more effective customer engagement strategies.

It is important for organizations to quantify the potential benefits of IoT initiatives as part of their decision-making process. According to a report by McKinsey & Company, IoT has the potential to generate up to $11.1 trillion a year in economic value by 2025 across various industries. This underscores the significant impact that IoT can have on operational efficiency and overall business performance.

Real-World Examples

Several leading organizations have successfully leveraged IoT to enhance their operations. For example, General Electric has developed its own Predix platform, a comprehensive IoT solution that enables industrial-scale analytics for asset performance management and operational optimization. By choosing to build its own platform, GE has been able to tailor the solution to its specific needs, gaining a competitive advantage in the industrial IoT space.

On the other hand, FedEx has opted to buy IoT solutions to improve its logistics and supply chain operations. By integrating off-the-shelf IoT devices and platforms, FedEx has achieved real-time tracking of shipments, optimized route planning, and enhanced security. This approach has allowed FedEx to quickly realize the benefits of IoT without the need for extensive internal development.

In conclusion, the decision to build or buy IoT solutions is a complex one that requires careful consideration of strategic, operational, and risk factors. By aligning this decision with their strategic objectives and operational needs, organizations can effectively leverage IoT technologies to drive significant improvements in operational efficiency, customer satisfaction, and competitive positioning.

Best Practices in Build vs. Buy

Here are best practices relevant to Build vs. Buy from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Build vs. Buy materials here.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Explore all of our best practices in: Build vs. Buy

Build vs. Buy Case Studies

For a practical understanding of Build vs. Buy, take a look at these case studies.

Defense Procurement Strategy for Aerospace Components

Scenario: The organization is a major player in the aerospace defense sector, grappling with the decision to make or buy critical components.

Read Full Case Study

Build vs. Buy Decision Framework for Semiconductor Manufacturer

Scenario: A semiconductor firm in the highly competitive technology sector is grappling with the strategic decision of building in-house capabilities versus buying or licensing from external sources.

Read Full Case Study

Telecom Infrastructure Outsourcing Strategy

Scenario: The organization is a regional telecom operator facing increased pressure to modernize its infrastructure while managing costs.

Read Full Case Study

Luxury Brand E-commerce Platform Decision

Scenario: A luxury fashion house is grappling with the decision to develop an in-house e-commerce platform or to leverage an existing third-party solution.

Read Full Case Study

Make or Buy Decision Analysis for Luxury Goods Manufacturer

Scenario: The organization in question is a high-end luxury goods manufacturer facing challenges in deciding whether to make components in-house or outsource to third-party vendors.

Read Full Case Study

Sustainability Strategy for Boutique Hotel Chain in Eco-Tourism Niche

Scenario: A boutique hotel chain in the eco-tourism sector is navigating the strategic challenge of a "build vs.

Read Full Case Study


Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies

Related Questions

Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.

How should companies approach the make-or-buy decision in highly regulated industries differently?
In highly regulated industries, companies must adopt a comprehensive approach to the make-or-buy decision, considering Regulatory Compliance, Risk Management, Strategic Alignment, and long-term implications for sustainable success. [Read full explanation]
What is a make or buy analysis?
A make or buy analysis is a strategic framework for deciding whether to produce a product in-house or purchase it from an external supplier, considering cost, quality, and risk. [Read full explanation]
What are the key indicators that suggest a company should pivot from a "Buy" to a "Build" strategy, or vice versa, in response to market changes?
Discover when to pivot from a Buy to a Build strategy (or vice versa) by evaluating Cost, Time to Market, Core Competencies, and Strategic Fit for competitive advantage. [Read full explanation]
What role does corporate social responsibility (CSR) play in the Build vs. Buy decision-making process?
Integrating Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) into Strategic Planning and Operational Excellence influences the Build vs. Buy decision, enhancing brand reputation, sustainability, and market competitiveness. [Read full explanation]
How can companies effectively measure and compare the innovation potential of Build vs. Buy options?
Organizations can evaluate the innovation potential of Build vs. Buy options by conducting Skills and Capabilities Assessments, Financial Analyses, and Risk Assessments, employing Decision Matrices and Scenario Planning to align with Strategic Planning and Innovation Strategy. [Read full explanation]
What impact do global supply chain disruptions have on the make-or-buy decision-making process?
Global supply chain disruptions significantly impact the make-or-buy decision-making process, emphasizing Risk Management, Strategic Alignment, Operational Excellence, and the need for agility, resilience, and innovation in sourcing strategies. [Read full explanation]

 
Joseph Robinson, New York

Operational Excellence, Management Consulting

This Q&A article was reviewed by Joseph Robinson. Joseph is the VP of Strategy at Flevy with expertise in Corporate Strategy and Operational Excellence. Prior to Flevy, Joseph worked at the Boston Consulting Group. He also has an MBA from MIT Sloan.

To cite this article, please use:

Source: "How are companies leveraging the Internet of Things (IoT) in their Build vs. Buy decisions to improve operational efficiency?," Flevy Management Insights, Joseph Robinson, 2025




Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials

 
"As a small business owner, the resource material available from FlevyPro has proven to be invaluable. The ability to search for material on demand based our project events and client requirements was great for me and proved very beneficial to my clients. Importantly, being able to easily edit and tailor "

– Michael Duff, Managing Director at Change Strategy (UK)
 
"FlevyPro has been a brilliant resource for me, as an independent growth consultant, to access a vast knowledge bank of presentations to support my work with clients. In terms of RoI, the value I received from the very first presentation I downloaded paid for my subscription many times over! The "

– Roderick Cameron, Founding Partner at SGFE Ltd
 
"As a niche strategic consulting firm, Flevy and FlevyPro frameworks and documents are an on-going reference to help us structure our findings and recommendations to our clients as well as improve their clarity, strength, and visual power. For us, it is an invaluable resource to increase our impact and value."

– David Coloma, Consulting Area Manager at Cynertia Consulting
 
"I like your product. I'm frequently designing PowerPoint presentations for my company and your product has given me so many great ideas on the use of charts, layouts, tools, and frameworks. I really think the templates are a valuable asset to the job."

– Roberto Fuentes Martinez, Senior Executive Director at Technology Transformation Advisory
 
"As an Independent Management Consultant, I find Flevy to add great value as a source of best practices, templates and information on new trends. Flevy has matured and the quality and quantity of the library is excellent. Lastly the price charged is reasonable, creating a win-win value for "

– Jim Schoen, Principal at FRC Group
 
"If you are looking for great resources to save time with your business presentations, Flevy is truly a value-added resource. Flevy has done all the work for you and we will continue to utilize Flevy as a source to extract up-to-date information and data for our virtual and onsite presentations!"

– Debbi Saffo, President at The NiKhar Group
 
"I have used Flevy services for a number of years and have never, ever been disappointed. As a matter of fact, David and his team continue, time after time, to impress me with their willingness to assist and in the real sense of the word. I have concluded in fact "

– Roberto Pelliccia, Senior Executive in International Hospitality
 
"As a consulting firm, we had been creating subject matter training materials for our people and found the excellent materials on Flevy, which saved us 100's of hours of re-creating what already exists on the Flevy materials we purchased."

– Michael Evans, Managing Director at Newport LLC



Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.