Flevy Management Insights Q&A

What factors should manufacturers consider when deciding between Build vs. Buy for entering new markets?

     Joseph Robinson    |    Build vs. Buy


This article provides a detailed response to: What factors should manufacturers consider when deciding between Build vs. Buy for entering new markets? For a comprehensive understanding of Build vs. Buy, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Build vs. Buy best practice resources.

TLDR Organizations deciding between Build vs. Buy for new market entry must evaluate market entry speed, cost, control, strategic alignment, and conduct thorough market research and financial analysis.

Reading time: 5 minutes

Before we begin, let's review some important management concepts, as they relate to this question.

What does Build vs. Buy Decision mean?
What does Market Entry Speed mean?
What does Cost-Benefit Analysis mean?
What does Strategic Alignment mean?


When organizations contemplate entering new markets, the decision between building their own operations from the ground up or buying an existing player within the market is pivotal. This choice, often referred to as the "Build vs. Buy" decision, involves numerous factors that can significantly impact the organization's ability to achieve its strategic goals. In navigating this decision, organizations must consider market entry speed, cost, control over operations, and alignment with long-term strategic objectives.

Market Entry Speed and Competitive Advantage

One of the primary considerations in the Build vs. Buy decision is the speed of market entry. Acquiring or partnering with an existing entity within the target market can provide an immediate presence and customer base, which is particularly advantageous in fast-moving sectors. For example, in the technology industry, where product lifecycles are short and first-mover advantage can be crucial, buying an existing player can provide a significant competitive edge. This approach allows organizations to bypass the time-consuming and often bureaucratic processes involved in setting up new operations, such as obtaining licenses and building distribution networks.

However, building from scratch, while slower, allows for the cultivation of unique brand value and the development of operations that are fully aligned with the organization’s standards and expectations. This can be especially important in industries where brand differentiation is a key competitive factor. For instance, luxury goods manufacturers often prefer to build their own operations to ensure that the brand experience meets their exacting standards.

According to a report by McKinsey & Company, companies that choose to build their operations in new markets need to be prepared for a longer time horizon before seeing a return on investment. However, this approach can lead to a more sustainable competitive advantage through the development of unique assets and capabilities.

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Cost Considerations and Resource Allocation

The decision between building and buying also significantly hinges on cost considerations and the availability of resources. Buying an existing business can be expensive upfront but may offer quicker revenue streams and return on investment. This route can also provide immediate access to established supply chains, customer relationships, and local market knowledge, potentially reducing the overall cost of market entry. For example, when Walmart sought to expand into South Africa, it acquired Massmart, a local retail chain, for $2.4 billion, gaining immediate access to 14 African countries and a well-established supply network.

Conversely, building operations from the ground up can be less costly in terms of initial investment but requires significant capital for infrastructure, hiring, training, and marketing. This option also carries higher risks and uncertainties, as the organization must navigate local regulations, culture, and competitive landscapes without the benefit of established relationships. According to Bain & Company, organizations opting to build their presence in new markets should plan for a gradual scale-up, allowing for adjustments to strategy and operations as they gain local market insights.

Organizations must carefully assess their financial health and resource availability when choosing between building and buying. A thorough cost-benefit analysis that includes not only the immediate financial outlay but also long-term operational costs and potential revenue streams is essential for making an informed decision.

Strategic Alignment and Control Over Operations

Strategic alignment and control over operations are critical factors in the Build vs. Buy decision. When organizations choose to buy an existing company, they must ensure that the acquired company's culture, operations, and business model can be integrated with their own. This integration process can be complex and time-consuming, potentially leading to disruptions in business operations and dilution of the company’s brand identity. For instance, when Daimler and Chrysler merged, cultural and operational differences led to significant challenges that ultimately affected the merger's success.

Building operations, on the other hand, offers complete control over the development and implementation of business strategies, allowing for a seamless alignment with the organization's culture, values, and operational standards. This approach enables organizations to establish a strong foundation in the new market that is fully in line with their strategic objectives. However, it requires a deep understanding of the local market and the ability to adapt strategies to meet local consumer needs and preferences.

According to Accenture, organizations that successfully enter new markets through building operations often invest heavily in local talent and leadership development. This investment not only facilitates the alignment of operations with strategic goals but also ensures that the organization is well-positioned to respond to local market dynamics.

In conclusion, the decision to build or buy when entering new markets is multifaceted, requiring organizations to carefully weigh the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. Factors such as market entry speed, cost, strategic alignment, and control over operations play crucial roles in this decision-making process. Organizations must conduct thorough market research, financial analysis, and strategic planning to ensure that their approach to market entry is aligned with their overall business objectives and capabilities. Real-world examples from leading companies across various industries highlight the complexities and strategic considerations involved in successfully entering new markets.

Best Practices in Build vs. Buy

Here are best practices relevant to Build vs. Buy from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Build vs. Buy materials here.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Explore all of our best practices in: Build vs. Buy

Build vs. Buy Case Studies

For a practical understanding of Build vs. Buy, take a look at these case studies.

Defense Procurement Strategy for Aerospace Components

Scenario: The organization is a major player in the aerospace defense sector, grappling with the decision to make or buy critical components.

Read Full Case Study

Make or Buy Decision Analysis for Luxury Goods Manufacturer

Scenario: The organization in question is a high-end luxury goods manufacturer facing challenges in deciding whether to make components in-house or outsource to third-party vendors.

Read Full Case Study

Telecom Infrastructure Outsourcing Strategy

Scenario: The organization is a regional telecom operator facing increased pressure to modernize its infrastructure while managing costs.

Read Full Case Study

Build vs. Buy Decision Framework for Semiconductor Manufacturer

Scenario: A semiconductor firm in the highly competitive technology sector is grappling with the strategic decision of building in-house capabilities versus buying or licensing from external sources.

Read Full Case Study

Sustainability Strategy for Boutique Hotel Chain in Eco-Tourism Niche

Scenario: A boutique hotel chain in the eco-tourism sector is navigating the strategic challenge of a "build vs.

Read Full Case Study

Luxury Brand E-commerce Platform Decision

Scenario: A luxury fashion house is grappling with the decision to develop an in-house e-commerce platform or to leverage an existing third-party solution.

Read Full Case Study


Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies

Related Questions

Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.

How should companies approach the make-or-buy decision in highly regulated industries differently?
In highly regulated industries, companies must adopt a comprehensive approach to the make-or-buy decision, considering Regulatory Compliance, Risk Management, Strategic Alignment, and long-term implications for sustainable success. [Read full explanation]
What is a make or buy analysis?
A make or buy analysis is a strategic framework for deciding whether to produce a product in-house or purchase it from an external supplier, considering cost, quality, and risk. [Read full explanation]
What are the key indicators that suggest a company should pivot from a "Buy" to a "Build" strategy, or vice versa, in response to market changes?
Discover when to pivot from a Buy to a Build strategy (or vice versa) by evaluating Cost, Time to Market, Core Competencies, and Strategic Fit for competitive advantage. [Read full explanation]
What role does digital transformation play in influencing the make-or-buy decision-making process?
Digital Transformation significantly alters the make-or-buy decision-making process by adding considerations of digital capabilities, innovation potential, and market agility into Strategic Planning, Operational Excellence, and Risk Management. [Read full explanation]
What role does corporate social responsibility (CSR) play in the Build vs. Buy decision-making process?
Integrating Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) into Strategic Planning and Operational Excellence influences the Build vs. Buy decision, enhancing brand reputation, sustainability, and market competitiveness. [Read full explanation]
How can companies effectively measure and compare the innovation potential of Build vs. Buy options?
Organizations can evaluate the innovation potential of Build vs. Buy options by conducting Skills and Capabilities Assessments, Financial Analyses, and Risk Assessments, employing Decision Matrices and Scenario Planning to align with Strategic Planning and Innovation Strategy. [Read full explanation]

 
Joseph Robinson, New York

Operational Excellence, Management Consulting

This Q&A article was reviewed by Joseph Robinson. Joseph is the VP of Strategy at Flevy with expertise in Corporate Strategy and Operational Excellence. Prior to Flevy, Joseph worked at the Boston Consulting Group. He also has an MBA from MIT Sloan.

To cite this article, please use:

Source: "What factors should manufacturers consider when deciding between Build vs. Buy for entering new markets?," Flevy Management Insights, Joseph Robinson, 2025




Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials

 
"Flevy.com has proven to be an invaluable resource library to our Independent Management Consultancy, supporting and enabling us to better serve our enterprise clients.

The value derived from our [FlevyPro] subscription in terms of the business it has helped to gain far exceeds the investment made, making a subscription a no-brainer for any growing consultancy – or in-house strategy team."

– Dean Carlton, Chief Transformation Officer, Global Village Transformations Pty Ltd.
 
"Last Sunday morning, I was diligently working on an important presentation for a client and found myself in need of additional content and suitable templates for various types of graphics. Flevy.com proved to be a treasure trove for both content and design at a reasonable price, considering the time I "

– M. E., Chief Commercial Officer, International Logistics Service Provider
 
"I have used Flevy services for a number of years and have never, ever been disappointed. As a matter of fact, David and his team continue, time after time, to impress me with their willingness to assist and in the real sense of the word. I have concluded in fact "

– Roberto Pelliccia, Senior Executive in International Hospitality
 
"As a consulting firm, we had been creating subject matter training materials for our people and found the excellent materials on Flevy, which saved us 100's of hours of re-creating what already exists on the Flevy materials we purchased."

– Michael Evans, Managing Director at Newport LLC
 
"As an Independent Management Consultant, I find Flevy to add great value as a source of best practices, templates and information on new trends. Flevy has matured and the quality and quantity of the library is excellent. Lastly the price charged is reasonable, creating a win-win value for "

– Jim Schoen, Principal at FRC Group
 
"FlevyPro has been a brilliant resource for me, as an independent growth consultant, to access a vast knowledge bank of presentations to support my work with clients. In terms of RoI, the value I received from the very first presentation I downloaded paid for my subscription many times over! The "

– Roderick Cameron, Founding Partner at SGFE Ltd
 
"One of the great discoveries that I have made for my business is the Flevy library of training materials.

As a Lean Transformation Expert, I am always making presentations to clients on a variety of topics: Training, Transformation, Total Productive Maintenance, Culture, Coaching, Tools, Leadership Behavior, etc. Flevy "

– Ed Kemmerling, Senior Lean Transformation Expert at PMG
 
"I have found Flevy to be an amazing resource and library of useful presentations for lean sigma, change management and so many other topics. This has reduced the time I need to spend on preparing for my performance consultation. The library is easily accessible and updates are regularly provided. A wealth of great information."

– Cynthia Howard RN, PhD, Executive Coach at Ei Leadership



Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.