This article provides a detailed response to: What considerations should companies take into account for Build vs. Buy in the context of international expansion? For a comprehensive understanding of Build vs. Buy, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Build vs. Buy best practice resources.
TLDR Companies must evaluate Strategic Alignment, Market Entry Speed, Cost, Resource Allocation, and Risk Management when deciding between building new operations or acquiring existing entities for international expansion.
Before we begin, let's review some important management concepts, as they related to this question.
In the context of international expansion, organizations face the critical decision of whether to build new operations from the ground up or to buy existing entities. This decision can significantly affect an organization's ability to achieve its Strategic Planning objectives, Operational Excellence, and long-term sustainability in new markets. The choice between building and buying involves complex considerations that span financial, strategic, and operational dimensions.
Strategic Alignment and Market Entry Speed
When considering international expansion, organizations must evaluate how the build vs. buy decision aligns with their overarching Strategy Development goals. Building operations from scratch can offer a clean slate for aligning new international operations with the organization's culture, processes, and technology. However, this approach often requires a longer timeframe to establish a market presence. On the other hand, acquiring an existing entity can significantly accelerate market entry but may come with challenges in integrating the acquired company's culture, systems, and operations with those of the parent organization.
Market entry speed is crucial in fast-moving sectors where first-mover advantages can dictate long-term market dominance. A study by McKinsey & Company highlights that in digital industries, for example, companies that move swiftly to acquire local players can often outpace competitors by leveraging established market relationships and local consumer insights. Yet, the same study cautions that hastily made acquisitions without thorough due diligence can lead to costly integration issues and dilute the intended strategic benefits.
Organizations must weigh the importance of speed against the potential for misalignment with strategic objectives. This involves a detailed analysis of the target market's characteristics, competitive landscape, and the organization's readiness to integrate new operations effectively.
Cost Considerations and Resource Allocation
Financial implications play a pivotal role in the build vs. buy decision. Building operations from the ground up often involves significant upfront investment in infrastructure, talent recruitment, and market development activities. These investments can strain an organization's resources, especially if the international expansion does not yield expected returns in the anticipated timeframe. Conversely, buying an existing entity requires a substantial initial outlay but can lead to quicker revenue streams and market penetration.
According to Bain & Company, the decision should also consider the total cost of ownership (TCO), which includes not just the initial investment but also ongoing operational costs, integration expenses, and the cost of potential risks and uncertainties. A detailed TCO analysis can reveal hidden costs associated with both building and buying that may not be apparent at the outset. For instance, the cost of aligning an acquired company's technology and processes with those of the parent organization can be significant and should not be underestimated.
Resource allocation extends beyond financial capital to include human capital and management bandwidth. Organizations must assess whether they have the internal capabilities and leadership capacity to manage the complexities of establishing new operations abroad or integrating an acquired entity. This assessment should consider the organization's experience with previous international expansions and its ability to attract and retain talent in new markets.
Risk Management and Compliance
International expansion introduces a variety of risks, including regulatory compliance, market volatility, and cultural differences. The build vs. buy decision influences the organization's risk profile and its ability to manage these risks effectively. Building operations from scratch allows for a gradual approach to entering a new market, potentially reducing exposure to regulatory and market risks. Organizations can adapt more flexibly to changing regulations and market conditions when they have direct control over the establishment and growth of their operations.
Acquiring an existing entity, while offering immediate market access, can introduce complex regulatory compliance challenges, especially if the target company has existing compliance issues. PwC's Global M&A Industry Trends analysis indicates that due diligence in acquisitions has become increasingly complex, with a growing focus on compliance, cybersecurity, and data privacy issues. Failure to adequately address these concerns can result in significant legal and financial repercussions.
Moreover, risk management strategies must account for cultural integration challenges that can affect employee morale, brand perception, and customer relationships. Organizations that opt to buy must invest in comprehensive cultural integration programs to align the values, behaviors, and practices of the acquired entity with those of the parent organization, thereby mitigating potential internal conflicts and external brand image risks.
In conclusion, the decision to build or buy in the context of international expansion requires a careful analysis of strategic alignment, cost and resource implications, and risk management considerations. Organizations must approach this decision with a comprehensive understanding of their strategic objectives, financial capacity, operational capabilities, and risk tolerance to ensure successful international growth.
Best Practices in Build vs. Buy
Here are best practices relevant to Build vs. Buy from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Build vs. Buy materials here.
Explore all of our best practices in: Build vs. Buy
Build vs. Buy Case Studies
For a practical understanding of Build vs. Buy, take a look at these case studies.
Telecom Infrastructure Outsourcing Strategy
Scenario: The organization is a regional telecom operator facing increased pressure to modernize its infrastructure while managing costs.
Defense Procurement Strategy for Aerospace Components
Scenario: The organization is a major player in the aerospace defense sector, grappling with the decision to make or buy critical components.
Customer Loyalty Program Development in the Cosmetics Industry
Scenario: The organization is a multinational cosmetics enterprise seeking to enhance its competitive edge by establishing a customer loyalty program.
Luxury Brand E-commerce Platform Decision
Scenario: A luxury fashion house is grappling with the decision to develop an in-house e-commerce platform or to leverage an existing third-party solution.
Make or Buy Decision Analysis for a Global Electronics Manufacturer
Scenario: A global electronics manufacturer is grappling with escalating operational costs and supply chain complexities.
Global Supply Chain Optimization Strategy for Industrial Metals Distributor
Scenario: An established industrial metals distributor is facing a critical "make or buy" decision to improve its global supply chain efficiency.
Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies
Related Questions
Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.
Source: Executive Q&A: Build vs. Buy Questions, Flevy Management Insights, 2024
Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.
Leverage the Experience of Experts.
Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.
Download Immediately and Use.
Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.
Save Time, Effort, and Money.
Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.
