Flevy Management Insights Q&A

What considerations should companies take into account for Build vs. Buy in the context of international expansion?

     Joseph Robinson    |    Build vs. Buy


This article provides a detailed response to: What considerations should companies take into account for Build vs. Buy in the context of international expansion? For a comprehensive understanding of Build vs. Buy, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Build vs. Buy best practice resources.

TLDR Companies must evaluate Strategic Alignment, Market Entry Speed, Cost, Resource Allocation, and Risk Management when deciding between building new operations or acquiring existing entities for international expansion.

Reading time: 5 minutes

Before we begin, let's review some important management concepts, as they related to this question.

What does Strategic Alignment mean?
What does Cost Considerations mean?
What does Risk Management mean?


In the context of international expansion, organizations face the critical decision of whether to build new operations from the ground up or to buy existing entities. This decision can significantly affect an organization's ability to achieve its Strategic Planning objectives, Operational Excellence, and long-term sustainability in new markets. The choice between building and buying involves complex considerations that span financial, strategic, and operational dimensions.

Strategic Alignment and Market Entry Speed

When considering international expansion, organizations must evaluate how the build vs. buy decision aligns with their overarching Strategy Development goals. Building operations from scratch can offer a clean slate for aligning new international operations with the organization's culture, processes, and technology. However, this approach often requires a longer timeframe to establish a market presence. On the other hand, acquiring an existing entity can significantly accelerate market entry but may come with challenges in integrating the acquired company's culture, systems, and operations with those of the parent organization.

Market entry speed is crucial in fast-moving sectors where first-mover advantages can dictate long-term market dominance. A study by McKinsey & Company highlights that in digital industries, for example, companies that move swiftly to acquire local players can often outpace competitors by leveraging established market relationships and local consumer insights. Yet, the same study cautions that hastily made acquisitions without thorough due diligence can lead to costly integration issues and dilute the intended strategic benefits.

Organizations must weigh the importance of speed against the potential for misalignment with strategic objectives. This involves a detailed analysis of the target market's characteristics, competitive landscape, and the organization's readiness to integrate new operations effectively.

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Cost Considerations and Resource Allocation

Financial implications play a pivotal role in the build vs. buy decision. Building operations from the ground up often involves significant upfront investment in infrastructure, talent recruitment, and market development activities. These investments can strain an organization's resources, especially if the international expansion does not yield expected returns in the anticipated timeframe. Conversely, buying an existing entity requires a substantial initial outlay but can lead to quicker revenue streams and market penetration.

According to Bain & Company, the decision should also consider the total cost of ownership (TCO), which includes not just the initial investment but also ongoing operational costs, integration expenses, and the cost of potential risks and uncertainties. A detailed TCO analysis can reveal hidden costs associated with both building and buying that may not be apparent at the outset. For instance, the cost of aligning an acquired company's technology and processes with those of the parent organization can be significant and should not be underestimated.

Resource allocation extends beyond financial capital to include human capital and management bandwidth. Organizations must assess whether they have the internal capabilities and leadership capacity to manage the complexities of establishing new operations abroad or integrating an acquired entity. This assessment should consider the organization's experience with previous international expansions and its ability to attract and retain talent in new markets.

Risk Management and Compliance

International expansion introduces a variety of risks, including regulatory compliance, market volatility, and cultural differences. The build vs. buy decision influences the organization's risk profile and its ability to manage these risks effectively. Building operations from scratch allows for a gradual approach to entering a new market, potentially reducing exposure to regulatory and market risks. Organizations can adapt more flexibly to changing regulations and market conditions when they have direct control over the establishment and growth of their operations.

Acquiring an existing entity, while offering immediate market access, can introduce complex regulatory compliance challenges, especially if the target company has existing compliance issues. PwC's Global M&A Industry Trends analysis indicates that due diligence in acquisitions has become increasingly complex, with a growing focus on compliance, cybersecurity, and data privacy issues. Failure to adequately address these concerns can result in significant legal and financial repercussions.

Moreover, risk management strategies must account for cultural integration challenges that can affect employee morale, brand perception, and customer relationships. Organizations that opt to buy must invest in comprehensive cultural integration programs to align the values, behaviors, and practices of the acquired entity with those of the parent organization, thereby mitigating potential internal conflicts and external brand image risks.

In conclusion, the decision to build or buy in the context of international expansion requires a careful analysis of strategic alignment, cost and resource implications, and risk management considerations. Organizations must approach this decision with a comprehensive understanding of their strategic objectives, financial capacity, operational capabilities, and risk tolerance to ensure successful international growth.

Best Practices in Build vs. Buy

Here are best practices relevant to Build vs. Buy from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Build vs. Buy materials here.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Explore all of our best practices in: Build vs. Buy

Build vs. Buy Case Studies

For a practical understanding of Build vs. Buy, take a look at these case studies.

Defense Procurement Strategy for Aerospace Components

Scenario: The organization is a major player in the aerospace defense sector, grappling with the decision to make or buy critical components.

Read Full Case Study

Telecom Infrastructure Outsourcing Strategy

Scenario: The organization is a regional telecom operator facing increased pressure to modernize its infrastructure while managing costs.

Read Full Case Study

Build vs. Buy Decision Framework for Semiconductor Manufacturer

Scenario: A semiconductor firm in the highly competitive technology sector is grappling with the strategic decision of building in-house capabilities versus buying or licensing from external sources.

Read Full Case Study

Luxury Brand E-commerce Platform Decision

Scenario: A luxury fashion house is grappling with the decision to develop an in-house e-commerce platform or to leverage an existing third-party solution.

Read Full Case Study

Make or Buy Decision Analysis for a Global Electronics Manufacturer

Scenario: A global electronics manufacturer is grappling with escalating operational costs and supply chain complexities.

Read Full Case Study

Make or Buy Decision Analysis for Luxury Goods Manufacturer

Scenario: The organization in question is a high-end luxury goods manufacturer facing challenges in deciding whether to make components in-house or outsource to third-party vendors.

Read Full Case Study


Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies

Related Questions

Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.

How should companies approach the make-or-buy decision in highly regulated industries differently?
In highly regulated industries, companies must adopt a comprehensive approach to the make-or-buy decision, considering Regulatory Compliance, Risk Management, Strategic Alignment, and long-term implications for sustainable success. [Read full explanation]
What is a make or buy analysis?
A make or buy analysis is a strategic framework for deciding whether to produce a product in-house or purchase it from an external supplier, considering cost, quality, and risk. [Read full explanation]
What are the key indicators that suggest a company should pivot from a "Buy" to a "Build" strategy, or vice versa, in response to market changes?
Discover when to pivot from a Buy to a Build strategy (or vice versa) by evaluating Cost, Time to Market, Core Competencies, and Strategic Fit for competitive advantage. [Read full explanation]
What role does corporate social responsibility (CSR) play in the Build vs. Buy decision-making process?
Integrating Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) into Strategic Planning and Operational Excellence influences the Build vs. Buy decision, enhancing brand reputation, sustainability, and market competitiveness. [Read full explanation]
What impact do global supply chain disruptions have on the make-or-buy decision-making process?
Global supply chain disruptions significantly impact the make-or-buy decision-making process, emphasizing Risk Management, Strategic Alignment, Operational Excellence, and the need for agility, resilience, and innovation in sourcing strategies. [Read full explanation]
In what ways can the make-or-buy decision impact a company's sustainability goals and practices?
The make-or-buy decision significantly impacts an organization's sustainability by influencing environmental stewardship, social responsibility, and economic viability through direct control or supply chain influence. [Read full explanation]

 
Joseph Robinson, New York

Operational Excellence, Management Consulting

This Q&A article was reviewed by Joseph Robinson. Joseph is the VP of Strategy at Flevy with expertise in Corporate Strategy and Operational Excellence. Prior to Flevy, Joseph worked at the Boston Consulting Group. He also has an MBA from MIT Sloan.

To cite this article, please use:

Source: "What considerations should companies take into account for Build vs. Buy in the context of international expansion?," Flevy Management Insights, Joseph Robinson, 2025




Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials

 
"I am extremely grateful for the proactiveness and eagerness to help and I would gladly recommend the Flevy team if you are looking for data and toolkits to help you work through business solutions."

– Trevor Booth, Partner, Fast Forward Consulting
 
"Flevy is our 'go to' resource for management material, at an affordable cost. The Flevy library is comprehensive and the content deep, and typically provides a great foundation for us to further develop and tailor our own service offer."

– Chris McCann, Founder at Resilient.World
 
"As a small business owner, the resource material available from FlevyPro has proven to be invaluable. The ability to search for material on demand based our project events and client requirements was great for me and proved very beneficial to my clients. Importantly, being able to easily edit and tailor "

– Michael Duff, Managing Director at Change Strategy (UK)
 
"Flevy.com has proven to be an invaluable resource library to our Independent Management Consultancy, supporting and enabling us to better serve our enterprise clients.

The value derived from our [FlevyPro] subscription in terms of the business it has helped to gain far exceeds the investment made, making a subscription a no-brainer for any growing consultancy – or in-house strategy team."

– Dean Carlton, Chief Transformation Officer, Global Village Transformations Pty Ltd.
 
"[Flevy] produces some great work that has been/continues to be of immense help not only to myself, but as I seek to provide professional services to my clients, it gives me a large "tool box" of resources that are critical to provide them with the quality of service and outcomes they are expecting."

– Royston Knowles, Executive with 50+ Years of Board Level Experience
 
"As an Independent Management Consultant, I find Flevy to add great value as a source of best practices, templates and information on new trends. Flevy has matured and the quality and quantity of the library is excellent. Lastly the price charged is reasonable, creating a win-win value for "

– Jim Schoen, Principal at FRC Group
 
"As a consultant requiring up to date and professional material that will be of value and use to my clients, I find Flevy a very reliable resource.

The variety and quality of material available through Flevy offers a very useful and commanding source for information. Using Flevy saves me time, enhances my expertise and ends up being a good decision."

– Dennis Gershowitz, Principal at DG Associates
 
"My FlevyPro subscription provides me with the most popular frameworks and decks in demand in today’s market. They not only augment my existing consulting and coaching offerings and delivery, but also keep me abreast of the latest trends, inspire new products and service offerings for my practice, and educate me "

– Bill Branson, Founder at Strategic Business Architects



Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Curve, and many more.