They enable tracking of recovery time objectives (RTO) and recovery point objectives (RPO), essential for evaluating the efficiency of response and recovery strategies. KPIs in this context also assist in assessing the impact of business interruptions, guiding investments in preventive measures and recovery solutions. By continuously monitoring these KPIs, organizations can adapt their business continuity strategies to emerging threats and maintain operational stability in the face of disruptions.
KPI |
Definition
|
Business Insights [?]
|
Measurement Approach
|
Standard Formula
|
Alternative Worksite Readiness More Details |
The readiness of alternative worksites to be used in case the primary site is unavailable.
|
Indicates the organization's capability to continue critical operations from an alternate location in the event of a disruption.
|
Measures the percentage of essential personnel who can be relocated to an alternative worksite and the readiness of the site to support business operations.
|
(Number of Essential Personnel Ready to Relocate / Total Number of Essential Personnel) * 100
|
- An increasing trend in alternative worksite readiness may indicate a proactive approach to business continuity planning and risk management.
- A declining trend could signal a lack of investment in backup facilities or a misunderstanding of the potential risks associated with primary site unavailability.
- How quickly can the alternative worksite be operational in the event of an emergency?
- Are the necessary IT infrastructure and resources available at the alternative worksite to maintain critical operations?
- How often are alternative worksite readiness drills conducted to ensure staff are familiar with emergency procedures?
- Conduct regular audits and drills to ensure the alternative worksite can become operational at short notice.
- Ensure that critical data and applications are mirrored between the primary and alternative sites to facilitate a smooth transition.
- Invest in cross-training employees to perform essential functions at the alternative worksite, enhancing operational resilience.
Visualization Suggestions [?]
- Line charts showing the timeline and efficiency of setting up operations at the alternative site during drills or actual events.
- Bar charts comparing the readiness levels of different alternative sites over time.
- Lack of readiness at alternative worksites can lead to significant operational disruptions in the event of an emergency.
- Insufficient testing and preparation may result in unforeseen challenges when transitioning to an alternative site.
- Business continuity management software to plan, manage, and execute alternative worksite readiness strategies.
- Cloud-based data replication tools to ensure data availability across primary and alternative sites.
- Integrate alternative worksite readiness planning with IT disaster recovery plans to ensure a cohesive approach to business continuity.
- Link alternative worksite readiness metrics with enterprise risk management systems to align with overall business risk assessments.
- Improving alternative worksite readiness can significantly reduce downtime and financial losses during unplanned outages, enhancing overall business resilience.
- Overinvestment in alternative worksite readiness without proper risk assessment may lead to unnecessary expenditure and resource allocation.
|
Audit Finding Resolution Time More Details |
The time taken to resolve audit findings related to business continuity practices.
|
Provides insights into the responsiveness and efficiency of the organization in improving its business continuity practices.
|
Tracks the average time taken to address and close findings from business continuity audits.
|
Sum of Resolution Times for All Audit Findings / Total Number of Audit Findings
|
- Increasing resolution time for audit findings may indicate a growing backlog of business continuity issues.
- A decreasing resolution time could signal improved processes for addressing and resolving audit findings.
- Are there recurring patterns or common root causes for audit findings that take longer to resolve?
- How does the resolution time for audit findings compare to industry benchmarks or best practices?
- Implement a more structured and efficient process for addressing and resolving audit findings.
- Provide additional training or resources to staff responsible for addressing audit findings.
- Regularly review and update business continuity plans to proactively address potential audit findings.
Visualization Suggestions [?]
- Line charts showing the trend of resolution time for audit findings over time.
- Pareto charts to identify the most common types of audit findings and their resolution times.
- Long resolution times for audit findings may indicate a lack of preparedness for business continuity events.
- Repeatedly high resolution times can lead to non-compliance with regulatory requirements or industry standards.
- Utilize audit management software to track and manage the resolution of audit findings.
- Implement project management tools to streamline the resolution process and track progress.
- Integrate the resolution time for audit findings with overall business continuity planning and incident management processes.
- Link with risk management systems to identify potential areas for improvement in business continuity practices.
- Improving resolution time can enhance overall business resilience and reduce the potential impact of business disruptions.
- However, focusing solely on reducing resolution time may lead to overlooking the root causes of audit findings.
|
Average Recovery Cost More Details |
The average cost incurred by the organization to recover from a disruption, including direct and indirect expenses.
|
Reveals the financial impact of disruptions on the organization and helps in understanding the cost-effectiveness of recovery strategies.
|
Accounts for all costs associated with recovery from a disruption, including expenses for resources, equipment, and personnel.
|
Total Recovery Costs / Total Number of Recovery Incidents
|
- An increasing average recovery cost may indicate more frequent or severe disruptions affecting operations.
- A decreasing cost could signal improved resilience and response capabilities, or better risk management practices.
- What are the primary cost components of our recovery efforts, and how have they changed over time?
- Are there specific areas or processes where recovery costs tend to be consistently higher?
- Invest in business continuity planning and testing to identify and address vulnerabilities before disruptions occur.
- Implement measures to reduce downtime and expedite recovery, such as redundant systems or alternative work arrangements.
- Regularly review and update insurance coverage to ensure adequate protection against potential losses.
Visualization Suggestions [?]
- Line charts showing the trend of average recovery costs over time.
- Pie charts illustrating the distribution of recovery costs by category (e.g., labor, equipment, external services).
- High average recovery costs can strain financial resources and impact profitability.
- Persistent or increasing costs may indicate systemic issues in risk management or operational resilience.
- Business continuity management software to assess, plan, and manage recovery efforts.
- Risk assessment and mitigation tools to identify and address potential disruptions before they occur.
- Integrate recovery cost tracking with financial systems to better understand the overall impact on the organization's bottom line.
- Link recovery cost data with incident management systems to analyze the effectiveness of response efforts and identify areas for improvement.
- Reducing average recovery costs can free up resources for investment in other areas of the business, such as innovation or expansion.
- However, cutting costs without considering the potential impact on recovery capabilities may leave the organization more vulnerable to future disruptions.
|
CORE BENEFITS
- 50 KPIs under ISO 22301
- 15,468 total KPIs (and growing)
- 328 total KPI groups
- 75 industry-specific KPI groups
- 12 attributes per KPI
- Full access (no viewing limits or restrictions)
FlevyPro and Stream subscribers also receive access to the KPI Library. You can login to Flevy here.
|
IMPORTANT: 17 days left until the annual price is increased from $99 to $149.
$99/year
Backup Success Rate More Details |
The percentage of successful backup operations for critical data and systems, ensuring data recoverability.
|
Reflects the reliability of data backup processes and the organization's data protection capability.
|
Measures the percentage of successful data backup operations against the total backup attempts.
|
(Number of Successful Backups / Total Number of Backup Attempts) * 100
|
- An increasing backup success rate may indicate improved data management processes or better technology for backup operations.
- A decreasing rate could signal issues with data integrity, system failures, or inadequate backup procedures.
- Are there specific data or systems that consistently have lower backup success rates?
- How does our backup success rate compare with industry standards or best practices?
- Regularly test backup and recovery processes to ensure reliability.
- Invest in robust backup solutions and technologies to improve success rates.
- Implement data deduplication and compression techniques to optimize backup storage and reduce failure risks.
Visualization Suggestions [?]
- Line charts showing the trend of backup success rates over time.
- Pie charts comparing success rates for different critical systems or data categories.
- Low backup success rates can lead to data loss, compliance violations, and business disruptions.
- Frequent backup failures may indicate vulnerabilities in the IT infrastructure or inadequate disaster recovery planning.
- Backup and recovery software like Veeam, Commvault, or Acronis for efficient data protection.
- Monitoring tools such as Nagios or Zabbix to track backup success rates and identify potential issues.
- Integrate backup success rate monitoring with incident management systems to quickly address any backup failures.
- Link backup performance data with IT service management platforms to prioritize improvements and resource allocation.
- Improving backup success rates can enhance data security and resilience, reducing the risk of data breaches and downtime.
- Conversely, a decline in backup success rates can increase the likelihood of data loss and compromise business continuity.
|
Business Continuity Plan (BCP) Maturity More Details |
The level of development and readiness of the organization's BCP, including documentation, processes, and employee training.
|
Offers insights into the BCP's effectiveness, areas for improvement, and readiness for various disruption scenarios.
|
Assesses the level of development and sophistication of the BCP against a maturity model with defined stages.
|
Maturity Level Score Assigned Based on Defined Criteria
|
- As organizations mature, their BCP tends to evolve from basic, reactive measures to more sophisticated, proactive strategies, indicating a positive shift in preparedness and resilience.
- A stagnation or decline in BCP maturity could signal a lack of investment in continuity planning, potentially leaving the organization vulnerable to unforeseen disruptions.
- How comprehensive is our current BCP in covering all critical business functions and processes?
- When was the last time the BCP was updated, and does it account for recent changes in the business environment and operations?
- How often are BCP training and drills conducted, and are they effective in preparing employees for potential disruptions?
- Regularly review and update the BCP to reflect changes in the business environment, operations, and emerging threats.
- Conduct regular training sessions and drills for all employees to ensure they are familiar with their roles and responsibilities in the event of a disruption.
- Employ a continuous improvement approach to BCP maturity by incorporating lessons learned from drills and actual incidents.
Visualization Suggestions [?]
- Maturity model diagrams to visually represent the current state of BCP maturity and areas for improvement.
- Timeline charts showing the history of BCP updates, training sessions, and incidents to track progress over time.
- A low level of BCP maturity can significantly increase the risk of operational downtime and financial loss in the event of a disruption.
- Lack of regular updates and training may render the BCP ineffective, leaving employees unprepared for emergency situations.
- Business continuity management software to streamline the development, management, and execution of BCPs.
- Online training platforms to facilitate regular and accessible BCP training for employees.
- Integrate BCP initiatives with risk management systems to ensure a comprehensive approach to organizational resilience.
- Link BCP maturity tracking with HR systems to monitor and manage training completion and competency levels across the organization.
- Improving BCP maturity can enhance organizational resilience, potentially reducing downtime and financial losses during disruptions.
- However, achieving a high level of BCP maturity may require significant investment in training, technology, and process development.
|
Business Continuity Plan Accessibility More Details |
The accessibility of the BCP to relevant personnel, ensuring it can be activated promptly.
|
Highlights potential barriers to BCP implementation due to accessibility issues and informs improvements to ensure availability.
|
Tracks the percentage of staff who can access the BCP when needed, both physically and digitally.
|
(Number of Staff with BCP Access / Total Staff) * 100
|
- An increasing difficulty in accessing the BCP may indicate organizational changes or lack of regular updates to the plan.
- A decreasing trend could signal improved communication and training on BCP activation procedures.
- Are there specific departments or individuals who struggle to access the BCP when needed?
- How often is the BCP reviewed and updated to ensure its accessibility and relevance?
- Regularly conduct BCP training and drills to ensure all relevant personnel are familiar with the plan and its activation procedures.
- Implement a centralized and easily accessible digital platform for the BCP, such as a cloud-based document management system.
- Establish clear communication channels and escalation procedures for activating the BCP in case of emergencies.
Visualization Suggestions [?]
- Line charts showing the frequency of BCP access attempts over time.
- Bar graphs comparing the average time it takes for different departments to access the BCP when needed.
- Difficulty in accessing the BCP during emergencies can lead to delays in response and recovery efforts.
- Inadequate BCP accessibility may result in non-compliance with regulatory requirements or industry standards.
- Document management systems like SharePoint or Google Drive for centralized BCP storage and access.
- Emergency notification and communication tools to quickly alert relevant personnel about BCP activation.
- Integrate BCP accessibility tracking with incident management systems to ensure a seamless transition from incident identification to BCP activation.
- Link BCP accessibility with employee training and certification systems to ensure all personnel are adequately trained in BCP activation procedures.
- Improved BCP accessibility can enhance overall organizational resilience and reduce the impact of disruptive events.
- On the other hand, poor BCP accessibility may lead to increased downtime and financial losses during disruptions.
|
In selecting the most appropriate ISO 22301 KPIs from our KPI Library for your organizational situation, keep in mind the following guiding principles:
It is also important to remember that the only constant is change—strategies evolve, markets experience disruptions, and organizational environments also change over time. Thus, in an ever-evolving business landscape, what was relevant yesterday may not be today, and this principle applies directly to KPIs. We should follow these guiding principles to ensure our KPIs are maintained properly:
By systematically reviewing and adjusting our ISO 22301 KPIs, we can ensure that your organization's decision-making is always supported by the most relevant and actionable data, keeping the organization agile and aligned with its evolving strategic objectives.