This PPT slide, part of the 31-slide New Technology Business Case PowerPoint presentation, presents a vendor comparison focused on the cost and feature trade-offs of different technology solutions for an organization. It highlights 3 vendors: Hadoop, IBM, and an unspecified third vendor, referred to as Vendor X. The primary aim is to illustrate that Vendor X is the most suitable choice based on the analysis of implementation costs, ongoing maintenance costs, and feature sets.

Implementation costs for Hadoop are significantly lower at $20,000 compared to IBM's $200,000. This stark difference suggests that Hadoop may offer a more budget-friendly entry point for organizations looking to adopt new technology. Ongoing maintenance costs also favor Hadoop, which stands at $20,000 annually, while IBM's maintenance costs are higher at $50,000. This ongoing expense is crucial for organizations to consider, as it impacts long-term budgeting and resource allocation.

The feature sets are also compared, with both Hadoop and Vendor X supporting Feature Set X and Feature Set Y, while IBM lacks support for Feature Set Y. This indicates that Hadoop and Vendor X may provide more comprehensive solutions that align better with the organization's needs.

The concluding statement reinforces that Vendor X emerges as the best fit, balancing both technology capabilities and budgetary constraints. This slide effectively communicates the rationale for selecting Vendor X over the alternatives, emphasizing cost-effectiveness and feature alignment as key decision-making factors.

Overall, the slide serves as a clear, concise tool for decision-makers evaluating technology vendors, providing essential insights into cost and functionality that can guide purchasing decisions.

EXPLORE MORE SLIDES FROM THIS PRESENTATION

EXPLORE MORE PRESENTATIONS ON

Business Case Example Business Case