Check out our FREE Resources page – Download complimentary business frameworks, PowerPoint templates, whitepapers, and more.







Flevy Management Insights Q&A
What are the key differences between ISO 27001 and ISO 27002, and how should companies approach their concurrent implementation?


This article provides a detailed response to: What are the key differences between ISO 27001 and ISO 27002, and how should companies approach their concurrent implementation? For a comprehensive understanding of ISO 27002, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to ISO 27002 best practice resources.

TLDR ISO 27001 specifies ISMS requirements for certification, focusing on risk management and control selection, while ISO 27002 provides detailed control guidelines, with effective concurrent implementation involving gap analysis, strategic planning, and stakeholder engagement to improve Information Security Management.

Reading time: 4 minutes


Understanding the key differences between ISO 27001 and ISO 27002 and how organizations should approach their concurrent implementation is crucial for enhancing Information Security Management Systems (ISMS). Both standards play a significant role in the strategic planning and operational excellence of an organization's information security framework, but they serve different purposes and offer distinct guidelines for implementation.

Key Differences between ISO 27001 and ISO 27002

ISO 27001 is a certification standard that specifies the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving an ISMS within an organization. It adopts a process-based approach for establishing, implementing, operating, monitoring, reviewing, maintaining, and improving an ISMS. ISO 27001 is prescriptive and requires organizations to assess their information security risks and then select appropriate security controls to mitigate these risks.

On the other hand, ISO 27002 serves as a best practice guide on information security controls, supporting organizations in the implementation of ISO 27001. It provides a detailed description of potential controls and control mechanisms that an organization can consider. However, unlike ISO 27001, ISO 27002 is not intended for certification purposes. Instead, it offers guidance to organizations on the types of controls they could implement to achieve the requirements specified in ISO 27001.

The primary difference lies in their application; ISO 27001 focuses on the requirements for an ISMS that an organization needs to fulfill to achieve certification, while ISO 27002 provides a comprehensive list of best practices and guidelines for implementing the controls necessary to meet those requirements. This distinction is crucial for organizations aiming to enhance their information security posture effectively.

Learn more about ISO 27001 Best Practices ISO 27002

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Approach to Concurrent Implementation

Organizations seeking to implement ISO 27001 and ISO 27002 concurrently should start with a thorough understanding of their current information security practices and how these align with the requirements and guidelines provided by these standards. A gap analysis is a critical first step, as it helps identify areas of improvement and the specific controls that need to be implemented or enhanced. This analysis should be informed by the organization's strategic objectives, considering the importance of information security in achieving these goals.

Following the gap analysis, organizations should develop a project plan that outlines the steps needed to address these gaps. This plan should include the allocation of resources, timelines, and responsibilities. It's important to prioritize actions based on the risk assessment outcomes, focusing first on areas that present the highest risk to the organization's information security. Engaging stakeholders across the organization is also crucial to ensure buy-in and to facilitate the integration of information security practices into daily operations.

Training and awareness programs are essential components of the implementation process. Employees at all levels should be made aware of the importance of information security and their role in maintaining it. Regular training sessions can help ensure that staff members are familiar with the security controls and practices that need to be followed. Additionally, organizations should establish continuous monitoring and review processes to ensure that the ISMS remains effective over time and can adapt to changes in the internal and external environment.

Real-World Examples and Authoritative Insights

While specific statistics from consulting or market research firms are not readily available for this topic, case studies from organizations that have successfully implemented both ISO 27001 and ISO 27002 highlight the benefits of a structured approach to information security. For instance, a multinational corporation may leverage ISO 27001 certification to demonstrate its commitment to information security to clients and stakeholders, while using ISO 27002 guidelines to inform its internal security control implementations. This dual approach not only enhances the organization's security posture but also strengthens its market position by showcasing a commitment to best practices in information security.

Furthermore, insights from firms like Gartner and Forrester emphasize the importance of aligning information security management with broader organizational strategies. They suggest that the successful implementation of ISO 27001 and ISO 27002 requires a top-down approach, where senior management leads by example and fosters a culture of security awareness throughout the organization.

In conclusion, the concurrent implementation of ISO 27001 and ISO 27002 offers organizations a comprehensive framework for managing and enhancing their information security practices. By understanding the key differences between these standards and adopting a structured approach to implementation, organizations can achieve a robust ISMS that supports their strategic objectives and operational needs.

Learn more about Market Research

Best Practices in ISO 27002

Here are best practices relevant to ISO 27002 from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our ISO 27002 materials here.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Explore all of our best practices in: ISO 27002

ISO 27002 Case Studies

For a practical understanding of ISO 27002, take a look at these case studies.

ISO 27002 Compliance Initiative for D2C Cosmetics Brand

Scenario: A direct-to-consumer cosmetics firm is grappling with the complexities of aligning its information security management to ISO 27002 standards.

Read Full Case Study

ISO 27002 Compliance Strategy for Retail Chain in Digital Market

Scenario: A mid-sized retail firm specializing in e-commerce is struggling to align its information security management with ISO 27002 standards.

Read Full Case Study

ISO 27002 Compliance Enhancement in Aerospace

Scenario: The organization is a mid-sized aerospace components supplier facing challenges in aligning its information security practices with ISO 27002 standards.

Read Full Case Study

Information Security Enhancement in Ecommerce

Scenario: The organization is a rapidly expanding ecommerce platform specializing in bespoke consumer goods, aiming to align its information security practices with ISO 27002 standards.

Read Full Case Study

IEC 27002 Compliance Enhancement for Financial Institution

Scenario: A large financial institution is experiencing increased security threats and non-compliance penalties stemming from deficient IEC 27002 practices.

Read Full Case Study

ISO 27002 Compliance Strategy for Chemical Sector Leader

Scenario: A leading chemical manufacturer is facing challenges in aligning its information security management practices with ISO 27002 standards.

Read Full Case Study

Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies

Related Questions

Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.

What are the common challenges faced by organizations in maintaining IEC 27002 compliance, and how can these be overcome?
Organizations face challenges in maintaining IEC 27002 compliance due to the evolving nature of technology and cybersecurity threats, the complexity of integrating security controls, and resource constraints, but can overcome these through strategic planning, continuous education, efficient resource management, and leveraging industry best practices and tools. [Read full explanation]
How is the increasing adoption of cloud computing affecting ISO 27002 implementation strategies?
The adoption of cloud computing necessitates adapting ISO 27002 implementation strategies to address cloud-specific security risks, enhance collaboration with service providers, and leverage cloud advantages for effective compliance. [Read full explanation]
How does ISO 27002 facilitate compliance with global data protection regulations such as GDPR?
ISO 27002 provides a comprehensive framework of best practices for Information Security Management, facilitating GDPR compliance through risk management, data protection by design, and continuous improvement, enhancing trust and competitive advantage. [Read full explanation]
What role does blockchain technology play in enhancing the security protocols outlined in IEC 27002?
Blockchain Technology Enhances IEC 27002 Security Protocols by Ensuring Data Integrity, Confidentiality, Improving Access Control, Authentication, and Facilitating Compliance, Auditability. [Read full explanation]
What impact do emerging technologies like AI and IoT have on the evolution of ISO 27002 standards?
AI and IoT technologies necessitate the evolution of ISO 27002 standards to address new cybersecurity challenges and guide organizations in implementing secure, adaptive information security practices. [Read full explanation]
How do ISO 27001 and IEC 27002 together enhance the cybersecurity posture of an organization?
ISO 27001 and IEC 27002 together provide a comprehensive framework for improving cybersecurity through Strategic Planning, Risk Management, Operational Excellence, and Continuous Improvement, building stakeholder confidence and ensuring compliance. [Read full explanation]

Source: Executive Q&A: ISO 27002 Questions, Flevy Management Insights, 2024


Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials



Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.