KPI Library - ISO 22000 KPIs

Why use the KPI Library?

Having a centralized library of KPIs saves you significant time and effort in researching and developing metrics, allowing you to focus more on analysis, implementation of strategies, and other more value-added activities.

This vast range of KPIs across various industries and functions offers the flexibility to tailor Performance Management and Measurement to the unique aspects of your organization, ensuring more precise monitoring and management.

Each KPI in the KPI Library includes 12 attributes:

KPI definition
Potential business insights [?]
Measurement approach/process [?]
Standard formula [?]
Trend analysis [?]
Diagnostic questions [?]
Actionable tips [?]
Visualization suggestions [?]
Risk warnings [?]
Tools & technologies [?]
Integration points [?]
Change impact [?]

It is designed to enhance Strategic Decision Making and Performance Management for executives and business leaders. Our KPI Library serves as a resource for identifying, understanding, and maintaining relevant competitive performance metrics.

Need KPIs for a function not listed? Email us at support@flevy.com.

We have 54 KPIs on ISO 22000 in our database. KPIs in ISO 22000 implementation are vital for monitoring food safety performance, including contamination control, compliance with safety standards, and effectiveness of food safety management systems. They help ensure consistent food quality and safety, complying with regulatory requirements.

These metrics are essential for tracking the efficiency of food safety processes, identifying areas for improvement, and reducing the risk of foodborne illnesses. They also facilitate better supply chain management, ensuring that all stakeholders adhere to food safety practices. KPIs under ISO 22000 enable food businesses to build consumer trust, maintain brand integrity, and ensure legal compliance in an increasingly safety-conscious market.

IMPORTANT: 17 days left until the annual price is increased from $99 to $149.

$99/year

Subscribe to the KPI Library

KPI	Definition	Business Insights [?]	Measurement Approach	Standard Formula
Allergen Management Effectiveness More Details	The effectiveness of procedures to manage and control allergens in food production, assessed by cross-contact incidents and labeling accuracy.	Reveals the ability of the organization to manage allergens and prevent allergen-related incidents, enhancing consumer trust and safety.	Percentage of successful control, identification, and communication of allergen-related information in products.	(Number of Allergen-related Incidents Prevented / Total Number of Potential Allergen-related Incidents) * 100
Trend Analysis [?] An increasing trend in cross-contact incidents or labeling inaccuracies may indicate lapses in allergen management protocols or training. A decreasing trend suggests improvements in allergen control measures, possibly due to enhanced training, better equipment, or more rigorous procedures. Diagnostic Questions [?] How often do cross-contact incidents occur, and what common factors contribute to these incidents? Is there a system in place for verifying the accuracy of allergen labeling on all products? How effectively are changes in allergen information communicated across the production and supply chain? Actionable Tips [?] Implement a robust allergen management training program for all staff involved in food production and handling. Regularly review and update cleaning protocols to prevent cross-contact of allergens. Use clear and consistent allergen labeling on all products, and regularly audit these labels for accuracy. Visualization Suggestions [?] Line graphs showing trends in cross-contact incidents over time to identify patterns or seasonal variations. Pie charts to represent the proportion of products with accurate allergen labeling versus those found to be inaccurate. Risk Warnings [?] Repeated cross-contact incidents can lead to consumer health risks, legal liabilities, and damage to brand reputation. Inaccurate allergen labeling may result in product recalls, financial losses, and decreased consumer trust. Tools & Technologies [?] Allergen control management software to track and monitor allergen-related incidents and corrective actions. Label verification systems to ensure accuracy and compliance with regulatory requirements. Integration Points [?] Integrate allergen management systems with supply chain management to ensure allergen information is accurate and up-to-date from ingredient sourcing to final product. Link allergen management effectiveness KPIs with customer feedback systems to quickly address any consumer concerns related to allergens. Change Impact [?] Improvements in allergen management effectiveness can lead to higher consumer trust and potentially open new market opportunities for allergen-free or allergen-controlled products. However, stringent allergen control measures may increase production costs due to the need for specialized equipment, training, or more rigorous testing procedures.
Batch Release Compliance Rate More Details	The percentage of production batches released for sale that meet all food safety criteria.	Indicates the capability of the production process to consistently meet quality and safety standards.	Considers the number of batches released without deviation from specified standards.	(Number of Batches Compliant with Release Criteria / Total Number of Batches Produced) * 100
Trend Analysis [?] An increasing batch release compliance rate may indicate improved quality control processes or stricter adherence to food safety standards. A decreasing rate could signal issues in production or supply chain that are impacting food safety criteria. Diagnostic Questions [?] Are there specific products or production lines that consistently have lower compliance rates? How do our compliance rates compare with industry benchmarks or regulatory requirements? Actionable Tips [?] Invest in regular training and education for staff involved in food safety and quality control processes. Implement stricter supplier evaluation and monitoring to ensure raw materials meet required safety standards. Utilize technology for real-time monitoring and data analysis to quickly identify and address non-compliance issues. Visualization Suggestions [?] Pareto charts to identify the most common reasons for non-compliance. Trend line graphs to track compliance rates over time and identify any patterns or anomalies. Risk Warnings [?] Low batch release compliance rates can lead to product recalls, regulatory fines, and damage to brand reputation. Consistently high non-compliance may indicate systemic issues that could pose a risk to public health and safety. Tools & Technologies [?] Quality management software like ETQ Reliance or MasterControl for comprehensive tracking and management of compliance processes. Data analytics tools to identify correlations and root causes of non-compliance issues. Integration Points [?] Integrate compliance data with production scheduling systems to ensure only compliant batches are scheduled for release. Link compliance tracking with customer feedback and complaints systems to identify any potential issues with released products. Change Impact [?] Improving batch release compliance can lead to increased customer trust and loyalty, positively impacting brand reputation and long-term profitability. Conversely, non-compliance can result in legal liabilities, product recalls, and loss of market share.
Change Control Effectiveness More Details	The effectiveness of managing changes to processes, equipment, or products without compromising food safety standards.	Highlights the robustness of the change management process and its impact on maintaining product integrity.	Measures the number of successful changes implemented without negative impact on product safety or quality.	(Number of Changes Effectively Implemented without Non-Conformities / Total Number of Changes Implemented) * 100
Trend Analysis [?] An increasing change control effectiveness may indicate improved processes and equipment management, leading to better food safety standards. A decreasing effectiveness could signal issues in managing changes, potentially compromising food safety standards. Diagnostic Questions [?] Are there specific processes or equipment changes that have led to an improvement or decline in food safety standards? How does our change control effectiveness compare with industry benchmarks or regulatory requirements? Actionable Tips [?] Implement regular training and education programs for employees involved in managing changes to ensure adherence to food safety standards. Utilize technology solutions for change management to streamline processes and reduce the risk of errors. Conduct regular audits and inspections to identify any potential gaps in change control processes. Visualization Suggestions [?] Line charts showing the change control effectiveness over time to identify any patterns or trends. Pareto charts to prioritize and address the most critical changes that impact food safety standards. Risk Warnings [?] Low change control effectiveness can lead to non-compliance with food safety regulations and potential product recalls. Inadequate change management may result in increased incidents of foodborne illnesses or safety hazards. Tools & Technologies [?] Utilize change management software to track and document all changes made to processes, equipment, or products. Implement food safety management systems that include modules for change control and compliance monitoring. Integration Points [?] Integrate change control effectiveness with quality management systems to ensure that changes do not compromise product quality or safety. Link change management processes with supply chain management systems to ensure that changes do not disrupt the flow of safe food products. Change Impact [?] Improving change control effectiveness can lead to better operational efficiency and reduced risks of food safety incidents. Conversely, a decline in effectiveness can lead to increased costs associated with managing food safety issues and potential legal liabilities.
KPI Library $99/year Navigate your organization to excellence with 15,468 KPIs at your fingertips. Subscribe to the KPI Library CORE BENEFITS 54 KPIs under ISO 22000 15,468 total KPIs (and growing) 328 total KPI groups 75 industry-specific KPI groups 12 attributes per KPI Full access (no viewing limits or restrictions) FlevyPro and Stream subscribers also receive access to the KPI Library. You can login to Flevy here.
Cleaning and Sanitization Effectiveness More Details	Evaluation of how effectively cleaning and sanitization procedures remove potential food safety hazards.	Provides insights into the adequacy of cleaning processes to prevent contamination and ensure food safety.	The percentage of cleaning and sanitation procedures that pass microbial and chemical swab tests.	(Number of Successful Cleaning and Sanitization Checks / Total Number of Cleaning and Sanitization Checks) * 100
Trend Analysis [?] An increasing trend in cleaning and sanitization effectiveness may indicate improved procedures or increased vigilance in maintaining food safety standards. A decreasing trend could signal potential lapses in cleaning protocols or a need for reevaluation of sanitization methods. Diagnostic Questions [?] Are there specific areas or equipment where cleaning and sanitization procedures seem less effective? How do our cleaning and sanitization effectiveness metrics compare with industry benchmarks or best practices? Actionable Tips [?] Regularly review and update cleaning and sanitization protocols based on industry standards and regulatory requirements. Invest in training and education for staff members responsible for cleaning and sanitization to ensure proper techniques are consistently followed. Implement regular audits and inspections to identify and address any potential gaps in cleaning and sanitization effectiveness. Visualization Suggestions [?] Line charts showing the trend in cleaning and sanitization effectiveness over time. Pie charts to visually represent the distribution of cleaning and sanitization effectiveness across different areas or equipment. Risk Warnings [?] Ineffective cleaning and sanitization can lead to foodborne illness outbreaks and damage to the reputation of the organization. Poor cleaning and sanitization effectiveness may result in non-compliance with regulatory standards and potential legal consequences. Tools & Technologies [?] Use ATP monitoring systems to measure the level of organic contamination on surfaces and assess the effectiveness of cleaning procedures. Implement digital checklists and tracking systems to ensure that cleaning and sanitization tasks are consistently performed and documented. Integration Points [?] Integrate cleaning and sanitization effectiveness data with quality control systems to identify any correlations between cleanliness and product quality. Link cleaning and sanitization metrics with production scheduling to ensure that cleaning activities are appropriately timed to minimize disruptions. Change Impact [?] Improving cleaning and sanitization effectiveness can lead to increased customer confidence and satisfaction, positively impacting brand reputation. However, changes in cleaning procedures may require additional resources and time, potentially impacting operational efficiency.
Continual Improvement Projects Implemented More Details	The number of continual improvement projects implemented to enhance food safety.	Demonstrates the commitment to continuous improvement and its impact on food safety.	Counts projects undertaken to enhance food safety, quality, and operational performance.	Total Number of Improvement Projects Successfully Implemented
Trend Analysis [?] An increasing number of continual improvement projects implemented may indicate a proactive approach to food safety and a commitment to ongoing enhancements. A decreasing trend could suggest complacency or resource constraints that hinder the implementation of improvement projects. Diagnostic Questions [?] Are the improvement projects targeted at specific areas of the food safety process, or are they more general in nature? How are the success and impact of these improvement projects being measured and evaluated? Actionable Tips [?] Regularly review and prioritize improvement opportunities based on risk assessments and feedback from internal and external stakeholders. Invest in training and development programs to empower employees to identify and implement improvement projects. Establish a culture of continuous improvement by recognizing and rewarding successful project implementations. Visualization Suggestions [?] Line charts showing the trend of improvement projects implemented over time. Pareto charts to identify the most common types of improvement projects being implemented. Risk Warnings [?] A low number of improvement projects may lead to stagnation in food safety practices and increase the risk of incidents or non-compliance. Implementing too many improvement projects simultaneously can strain resources and lead to inefficiencies. Tools & Technologies [?] Project management software to track and manage improvement projects from initiation to completion. Quality management systems with built-in improvement project tracking and reporting capabilities. Integration Points [?] Integrate improvement project data with food safety management systems to identify correlations between implemented projects and food safety performance. Link improvement project outcomes with employee performance evaluations and recognition programs to reinforce a culture of continuous improvement. Change Impact [?] Successfully implementing improvement projects can lead to a reduction in food safety incidents and associated costs. However, an excessive focus on quantity over quality of improvement projects may lead to ineffective or superficial changes that do not significantly enhance food safety.
Corrective Actions Closure Rate More Details	The rate at which identified non-conformities are resolved and corrective actions are implemented.	Assesses the responsiveness and effectiveness of corrective action systems in addressing non-conformities.	The percentage of corrective actions completed within the defined timeframe.	(Number of Corrective Actions Closed on Time / Total Number of Corrective Actions Issued) * 100
Trend Analysis [?] An increasing corrective actions closure rate may indicate a proactive approach to resolving non-conformities and improving overall quality management. A decreasing rate could signal complacency or a lack of focus on addressing identified issues, leading to potential quality and safety risks. Diagnostic Questions [?] Are there recurring non-conformities that are not being effectively addressed? How does our corrective actions closure rate compare with industry benchmarks or best practices? Actionable Tips [?] Implement a robust root cause analysis process to identify the underlying reasons for non-conformities. Provide adequate resources and training to employees responsible for implementing corrective actions. Regularly review and update corrective action plans to ensure effectiveness and relevance. Visualization Suggestions [?] Pareto charts to identify the most common non-conformities and prioritize corrective actions. Trend line graphs to track the closure rate over time and identify any significant shifts. Risk Warnings [?] A low closure rate may lead to an accumulation of unresolved non-conformities, increasing the risk of product recalls or safety incidents. Failure to address non-conformities in a timely manner can result in non-compliance with regulatory requirements and standards. Tools & Technologies [?] Quality management software like ETQ Reliance or MasterControl for tracking and managing corrective actions. Workflow automation tools to streamline the process of assigning, implementing, and verifying corrective actions. Integration Points [?] Integrate corrective actions closure data with quality control systems to identify recurring issues and prioritize improvement efforts. Link closure rate metrics with supplier management systems to address root causes of non-conformities in the supply chain. Change Impact [?] Improving the closure rate can lead to enhanced product quality, customer satisfaction, and brand reputation. However, investing in resources to address non-conformities may initially increase operational costs.

In selecting the most appropriate ISO 22000 KPIs from our KPI Library for your organizational situation, keep in mind the following guiding principles:

Relevance: Choose KPIs that are closely linked to your strategic objectives. If a KPI doesn't give you insight into your business objectives, it might not be relevant.

Actionability: The best KPIs are those that provide data that you can act upon. If you can't change your strategy based on the KPI, it might not be practical.

Clarity: Ensure that each KPI is clear and understandable to all stakeholders. If people can't interpret the KPI easily, it won't be effective.

Timeliness: Select KPIs that provide timely data so that you can make decisions based on the most current information available.

Benchmarking: Choose KPIs that allow you to compare your ISO 22000 performance against industry standards or competitors.

Data Quality: The KPIs should be based on reliable and accurate data. If the data quality is poor, the KPIs will be misleading.

Balance: It's important to have a balanced set of KPIs that cover different aspects of the organization—e.g. financial, customer, process, learning, and growth perspectives.

Review Cycle: Select KPIs that can be reviewed and revised regularly. As your organization and the external environment change, so too should your KPIs.

It is also important to remember that the only constant is change—strategies evolve, markets experience disruptions, and organizational environments also change over time. Thus, in an ever-evolving business landscape, what was relevant yesterday may not be today, and this principle applies directly to KPIs. We should follow these guiding principles to ensure our KPIs are maintained properly:

Scheduled Reviews: Establish a regular schedule (e.g. quarterly or biannually) for reviewing your ISO 22000 KPIs. These reviews should be ingrained as a standard part of the business cycle, ensuring that KPIs are continually aligned with current business objectives and market conditions.

Inclusion of Cross-Functional Teams: Involve representatives from various functions and teams, as well as non-ISO 22000 subject matter experts, in the review process. This ensures that the KPIs are examined from multiple perspectives, encompassing the full scope of the business and its environment. Diverse input can highlight unforeseen impacts or opportunities that might be overlooked by a single department.

Analysis of Historical Data Trends: During reviews, analyze historical data trends to determine the accuracy and relevance of each KPI. This analysis can reveal whether KPIs are consistently providing valuable insights and driving the intended actions, or if they have become outdated or less impactful.

Consideration of External Changes: Factor in external changes such as market shifts, economic fluctuations, technological advancements, and competitive landscape changes. KPIs must be dynamic enough to reflect these external factors, which can significantly influence business operations and strategy.

Alignment with Strategic Shifts: As organizational strategies evolve, consider whether the ISO 22000 KPIs need to be adjusted to remain aligned with new directions. This may involve adding new ISO 22000 KPIs, phasing out ones that are no longer relevant, or modifying existing ones to better reflect the current strategic focus.

Feedback Mechanisms: Implement a feedback mechanism where employees can report challenges and observations related to KPIs. Frontline insights are crucial as they can provide real-world feedback on the practicality and impact of KPIs.

Technology and Tools for Real-Time Analysis: Utilize advanced analytics tools and business intelligence software that can provide real-time data and predictive analytics. This technology aids in quicker identification of trends and potential areas for KPI adjustment.

Documentation and Communication: Ensure that any changes to the ISO 22000 KPIs are well-documented and communicated across the organization. This maintains clarity and ensures that all team members are working towards the same objectives with a clear understanding of what needs to be measured and why.

By systematically reviewing and adjusting our ISO 22000 KPIs, we can ensure that your organization's decision-making is always supported by the most relevant and actionable data, keeping the organization agile and aligned with its evolving strategic objectives.

KPI Library

$99/year

Navigate your organization to excellence with 15,468 KPIs at your fingertips.

Subscribe to the KPI Library

CORE BENEFITS

54 KPIs under ISO 22000
15,468 total KPIs (and growing)
328 total KPI groups

75 industry-specific KPI groups
12 attributes per KPI
Full access (no viewing limits or restrictions)

FlevyPro and Stream subscribers also receive access to the KPI Library. You can login to Flevy here.

Related Resources on the Flevy Marketplace

ISO 22000:2018 (FSMS) Awareness Training

78-slide PowerPoint

Operational Excellence Consulting

$69.00

Add to Cart

ISO 22000:2018 Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS)

254-slide PowerPoint

SB Consulting

$89.00

Add to Cart

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations

Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.