By tracking metrics such as release frequency, bug resolution times, and application downtime, organizations can ensure that their development practices align with business goals and user expectations. Additionally, KPIs assist in resource allocation by highlighting processes that may benefit from additional investment or streamlining. Lastly, the use of KPIs fosters a culture of continuous improvement, as teams can set benchmarks, monitor trends over time, and make data-driven decisions to enhance the quality and reliability of their applications.
KPI |
Definition
|
Business Insights [?]
|
Measurement Approach
|
Standard Formula
|
Application Accessibility Compliance More Details |
The extent to which applications comply with accessibility standards, ensuring usability for all users, including those with disabilities.
|
Helps ensure applications are usable by people with disabilities, reducing legal risks and improving user inclusivity.
|
Considers adherence to accessibility standards such as WCAG and Section 508.
|
(Number of Accessibility Issues Resolved / Total Identified Accessibility Issues) * 100
|
- Increasing compliance with accessibility standards may indicate a positive shift towards inclusivity and user-centered design.
- Decreasing compliance could signal neglect of accessibility requirements or a lack of awareness about the needs of all users.
- Are there specific features or functionalities within the applications that pose accessibility challenges?
- Have we conducted user testing with individuals who have disabilities to gather feedback on the accessibility of our applications?
- Train developers and designers on accessibility guidelines and best practices.
- Conduct regular accessibility audits and usability testing with individuals who have disabilities.
- Implement accessibility-focused design and development tools to facilitate compliance.
Visualization Suggestions [?]
- Line charts showing the trend of accessibility compliance over time.
- Stacked bar charts comparing compliance levels across different applications or modules.
- Non-compliance with accessibility standards can lead to legal issues and reputational damage.
- Inaccessible applications may exclude a significant portion of potential users, impacting user satisfaction and market reach.
- Accessibility testing tools like Axe, WAVE, or JAWS to evaluate and remediate accessibility issues.
- Integrated development environments (IDEs) with built-in accessibility checkers and plugins.
- Integrate accessibility compliance tracking with software development lifecycle (SDLC) tools to ensure early detection and resolution of issues.
- Link accessibility metrics with user experience (UX) analytics to understand the impact on user engagement and satisfaction.
- Improving accessibility compliance may require additional resources and time during the development process.
- Enhanced accessibility can lead to a more inclusive and diverse user base, potentially increasing user satisfaction and loyalty.
|
Application Load Time More Details |
The time it takes for an application to become fully usable after being launched, indicating the performance of the application.
|
Identifies performance bottlenecks, guiding efforts to optimize load times for an improved user experience.
|
Measures the duration it takes for an application to become fully usable after user initiation.
|
Average Time Taken for Application to Reach Usable State After Initiation
|
- Longer application load times over time may indicate performance degradation or increased resource demands.
- A decreasing load time could signal improvements in application optimization or infrastructure upgrades.
- Are there specific features or functionalities within the application that consistently contribute to longer load times?
- How does the application load time compare with industry benchmarks or user expectations?
- Optimize code and reduce unnecessary processes to improve application load time.
- Invest in faster hardware or cloud infrastructure to support the application's performance needs.
- Implement caching mechanisms to store frequently accessed data and reduce load times.
Visualization Suggestions [?]
- Line charts showing the trend of application load times over time.
- Box plots to visualize the distribution of load times and identify outliers.
- Long application load times can lead to user frustration and abandonment of the application.
- Consistently high load times may indicate underlying issues in application architecture or infrastructure.
- Application performance monitoring tools like New Relic or Datadog to track and analyze load times.
- Load testing tools such as Apache JMeter or LoadRunner to simulate and measure application performance under different conditions.
- Integrate application load time tracking with incident management systems to quickly address performance issues as they arise.
- Link with user experience analytics platforms to understand the impact of load times on user behavior and satisfaction.
- Improving application load time can enhance user experience and satisfaction, potentially leading to increased usage and customer retention.
- However, changes in infrastructure or optimization efforts may require investment and resource allocation.
|
Application Scalability More Details |
The ability of an application to handle increased loads without performance degradation, reflecting the application's architecture.
|
Assesses the application's capability to grow with the user base or data volume, indicating the need for infrastructure improvements.
|
Measures the ability of an application to handle increased loads without impacting performance.
|
Maximum User Load Supported / Average User Load Over Time
|
- Application scalability tends to improve as new technologies and architectural patterns emerge.
- Increased loads without performance degradation may indicate successful capacity planning and resource allocation.
- What are the typical usage patterns and load variations experienced by the application?
- Are there specific components or modules within the application that show signs of performance degradation under increased loads?
- Implement horizontal scaling by adding more instances of the application to distribute the load.
- Optimize database queries and caching mechanisms to handle increased data access efficiently.
- Regularly conduct load testing and performance profiling to identify scalability bottlenecks.
Visualization Suggestions [?]
- Line charts showing the relationship between increasing loads and response times.
- Area charts to visualize the capacity thresholds and performance degradation points.
- Inadequate scalability can lead to poor user experience, increased downtime, and potential revenue loss.
- Ignoring scalability issues may result in technical debt and the need for costly re-architecture in the future.
- Performance monitoring tools like New Relic or AppDynamics to track application response times under varying loads.
- Containerization platforms such as Docker and Kubernetes for flexible and scalable deployment.
- Integrate scalability metrics with DevOps processes to automate capacity adjustments based on real-time demand.
- Link scalability monitoring with incident management systems to quickly address performance degradation issues.
- Improving application scalability can enhance user satisfaction and retention, leading to increased customer lifetime value.
- However, over-optimizing for scalability may lead to higher infrastructure costs and potential over-provisioning.
|
CORE BENEFITS
- 45 KPIs under Application Development and Maintenance
- 15,468 total KPIs (and growing)
- 328 total KPI groups
- 75 industry-specific KPI groups
- 12 attributes per KPI
- Full access (no viewing limits or restrictions)
FlevyPro and Stream subscribers also receive access to the KPI Library. You can login to Flevy here.
|
IMPORTANT: 17 days left until the annual price is increased from $99 to $149.
$99/year
Application Uptime More Details |
The availability of the applications developed and maintained by the team. High application uptime indicates that the team is proactive in addressing issues and ensuring that the applications are running optimally.
|
Indicates reliability and availability, informing service level agreement (SLA) compliance and pointing to areas requiring stability improvements.
|
Measures the percentage of time an application is available and operational.
|
(Total Operational Time - Downtime) / Total Operational Time * 100
|
- Increasing application uptime may indicate proactive monitoring and quick issue resolution.
- Decreasing uptime could signal a lack of maintenance or an increase in technical issues.
- Are there recurring patterns or specific triggers for downtime?
- How does our application uptime compare with industry standards or benchmarks?
- Implement automated monitoring and alert systems to quickly identify and address downtime.
- Regularly schedule maintenance and updates to prevent potential issues.
- Invest in robust infrastructure and cloud services to ensure high availability.
Visualization Suggestions [?]
- Line charts showing uptime percentage over time.
- Stacked bar graphs comparing uptime across different applications or systems.
- Low application uptime can lead to decreased productivity and user frustration.
- Frequent downtime may indicate underlying technical debt or architectural issues.
- Application performance monitoring tools like New Relic or Datadog.
- Cloud infrastructure providers such as AWS or Azure for high availability setups.
- Integrate uptime tracking with incident management systems for seamless issue resolution.
- Link application uptime with user feedback platforms to understand the impact on user experience.
- Improving application uptime can enhance user satisfaction and overall business productivity.
- However, investing in high availability solutions may increase infrastructure costs.
|
Automated Test Coverage More Details |
The percentage of code that is covered by automated tests, which helps ensure quality and reduces the risk of defects slipping into production.
|
Reveals potential risks in code changes and the effectiveness of testing strategies in catching defects early in the development cycle.
|
Gauges the percentage of application code covered by automated tests.
|
(Number of Lines of Code Covered by Automated Tests / Total Lines of Code) * 100
|
- Increasing automated test coverage may indicate a growing emphasis on quality assurance and a proactive approach to defect prevention.
- Decreasing coverage could signal a decline in testing rigor or a lack of focus on quality, potentially leading to more defects in production.
- Are there specific modules or components with consistently low test coverage?
- How does our automated test coverage compare with industry standards or best practices?
- Implement test-driven development (TDD) practices to ensure that new code is accompanied by automated tests.
- Regularly review and update test suites to cover new features and changes in existing code.
- Invest in automated testing tools and frameworks to improve test coverage and efficiency.
Visualization Suggestions [?]
- Line charts showing the trend of test coverage over time.
- Pie charts illustrating the distribution of test coverage across different modules or components.
- Low test coverage increases the risk of undetected defects in production, leading to potential system failures or customer dissatisfaction.
- Overemphasis on test coverage without considering test effectiveness may lead to a false sense of security and inadequate defect prevention.
- Test automation tools like Selenium, Appium, or JUnit for automating tests across different layers of the application.
- Code coverage tools such as JaCoCo or Emma to measure the extent of code covered by automated tests.
- Integrate automated test coverage with continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines to ensure that new code is thoroughly tested before deployment.
- Link test coverage data with defect tracking systems to identify areas with low coverage that are prone to defects.
- Improving test coverage can lead to higher initial development effort but can reduce the cost of fixing defects in later stages of the software development lifecycle.
- Conversely, low test coverage may result in increased defect resolution time and potential impact on customer satisfaction and trust.
|
Build Success Rate More Details |
The percentage of successful builds out of the total number of build attempts, indicating the stability of the build process.
|
Reflects the stability and health of the code base, signaling where development processes can be refined.
|
Measures the percentage of successful builds out of the total build attempts.
|
(Number of Successful Builds / Total Number of Builds) * 100
|
- Increasing build success rate may indicate improvements in the build process, such as better automation or more reliable infrastructure.
- Decreasing success rate could signal issues with code quality, integration challenges, or resource constraints.
- Are there specific stages in the build process where failures are more common?
- How does our build success rate compare with industry benchmarks or best practices?
- Implement continuous integration and deployment practices to catch and address build issues earlier in the development cycle.
- Invest in better testing and quality assurance processes to reduce the likelihood of build failures.
- Regularly review and update the build infrastructure to ensure it can support the evolving needs of the development team.
Visualization Suggestions [?]
- Line charts showing the build success rate over time to identify trends and patterns.
- Stacked bar charts comparing success rates for different types of builds or projects.
- Frequent build failures can lead to project delays and decreased team morale.
- Consistently low success rates may indicate systemic issues that could impact the overall quality of the software being developed.
- Continuous integration and deployment tools like Jenkins, Travis CI, or CircleCI to automate and streamline the build process.
- Monitoring and logging tools such as Splunk or ELK Stack to track build success rates and diagnose failures.
- Integrate build success rate tracking with project management systems to better understand the impact of build issues on overall project timelines.
- Link with version control systems to identify patterns in build failures related to specific code changes or branches.
- Improving build success rate can lead to faster delivery of features and improvements in overall development efficiency.
- However, focusing solely on success rate without considering code quality and testing can lead to the release of unstable or low-quality software.
|
In selecting the most appropriate Application Development and Maintenance KPIs from our KPI Library for your organizational situation, keep in mind the following guiding principles:
It is also important to remember that the only constant is change—strategies evolve, markets experience disruptions, and organizational environments also change over time. Thus, in an ever-evolving business landscape, what was relevant yesterday may not be today, and this principle applies directly to KPIs. We should follow these guiding principles to ensure our KPIs are maintained properly:
By systematically reviewing and adjusting our Application Development and Maintenance KPIs, we can ensure that your organization's decision-making is always supported by the most relevant and actionable data, keeping the organization agile and aligned with its evolving strategic objectives.